Good Times Restaurants Inc (GTIM) — Free Cash Flow Generation Index
Good Times Restaurants Inc (GTIM) has a Free Cash Flow Generation Index of 0.87x as of December 2025. Free cash flow of $1.23 Million represents 1% of operating cash flow ($1.42 Million). See GTIM working capital efficiency to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
FCF Generation Index
Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Good Times Restaurants Inc Free Cash Flow Generation Index (1992–2025)
Historical FCF Generation Index trend for Good Times Restaurants Inc across 26 annual periods. Explore Good Times Restaurants Inc cash flow to debt ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Annual Free Cash Flow Generation for Good Times Restaurants Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year Free Cash Flow Generation Index for Good Times Restaurants Inc. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see GTIM market cap.
| Year | FCG Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.90x | $-1.45 Million | $1.61 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ -332.6% |
| 2024 | 0.39x | $1.99 Million | $5.13 Million | $3.14 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2023 | 0.40x | $3.19 Million | $7.96 Million | $4.77 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2022 | 0.50x | $2.65 Million | $5.29 Million | $2.64 Million | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2021 | 0.65x | $5.95 Million | $9.14 Million | $3.20 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2020 | 0.69x | $5.77 Million | $8.37 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +457.1% |
| 2019 | -0.19x | $-1.31 Million | $6.77 Million | $8.08 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2018 | -0.61x | $-3.94 Million | $6.50 Million | $10.44 Million | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2017 | -1.91x | $-9.53 Million | $4.98 Million | $14.51 Million | ▼ -232.7% |
| 2016 | -0.57x | $-3.10 Million | $5.40 Million | $8.50 Million | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2015 | -1.41x | $-4.46 Million | $3.17 Million | $7.63 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2014 | -1.36x | $-1.96 Million | $1.44 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2013 | -2.56x | $-1.80 Million | $703.00K | $2.51 Million | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2008 | -4.30x | $-2.66 Million | $619.00K | $3.28 Million | ▼ -284.0% |
| 2007 | -1.12x | $-1.98 Million | $1.76 Million | $3.74 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2006 | -1.73x | $-2.52 Million | $1.45 Million | $3.98 Million | ▲ +45.1% |
| 2005 | -3.16x | $-2.10 Million | $666.00K | $2.77 Million | ▼ -623.9% |
| 2004 | 0.60x | $284.00K | $471.00K | $187.00K | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2003 | 0.74x | $525.00K | $707.00K | $182.00K | ▲ +146.5% |
| 2002 | 0.30x | $348.00K | $1.16 Million | $807.00K | ▲ +218.1% |
| 2001 | -0.26x | $-344.00K | $1.35 Million | $1.69 Million | ▼ -205.3% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | $299.00K | $1.23 Million | $935.00K | ▼ -3.1% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $300.00K | $1.20 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -50.0% |
| 1998 | 0.50x | $200.00K | $400.00K | $200.00K | ▲ +111.0% |
| 1994 | -4.55x | $-5.00 Million | $1.10 Million | $6.10 Million | ▲ +24.2% |
| 1992 | -6.00x | $-600.00K | $100.00K | $700.00K | — |