Good Times Restaurants Inc (GTIM) — Free Cash Flow Generation Index
Good Times Restaurants Inc (GTIM) has a Free Cash Flow Generation Index of 0.37x as of March 2026. Free cash flow of $191.00K represents 0% of operating cash flow ($513.00K). Explore reinvestment intensity of Good Times Restaurants Inc to see what proportion of operating cash flow is directed to capital expenditures.
FCF Generation Index
Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Good Times Restaurants Inc Free Cash Flow Generation Index (1992–2025)
Historical FCF Generation Index trend for Good Times Restaurants Inc across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GTIM cash flow conversion.
Annual Free Cash Flow Generation for Good Times Restaurants Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year Free Cash Flow Generation Index for Good Times Restaurants Inc. Check how aggressively does Good Times Restaurants Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
| Year | FCG Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.90x | $-1.45 Million | $1.61 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ -332.6% |
| 2024 | 0.39x | $1.99 Million | $5.13 Million | $3.14 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2023 | 0.40x | $3.19 Million | $7.96 Million | $4.77 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2022 | 0.50x | $2.65 Million | $5.29 Million | $2.64 Million | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2021 | 0.65x | $5.95 Million | $9.14 Million | $3.20 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2020 | 0.69x | $5.77 Million | $8.37 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +457.1% |
| 2019 | -0.19x | $-1.31 Million | $6.77 Million | $8.08 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2018 | -0.61x | $-3.94 Million | $6.50 Million | $10.44 Million | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2017 | -1.91x | $-9.53 Million | $4.98 Million | $14.51 Million | ▼ -232.7% |
| 2016 | -0.57x | $-3.10 Million | $5.40 Million | $8.50 Million | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2015 | -1.41x | $-4.46 Million | $3.17 Million | $7.63 Million | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2014 | -1.36x | $-1.96 Million | $1.44 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +46.9% |
| 2013 | -2.56x | $-1.80 Million | $703.00K | $2.51 Million | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2008 | -4.30x | $-2.66 Million | $619.00K | $3.28 Million | ▼ -284.0% |
| 2007 | -1.12x | $-1.98 Million | $1.76 Million | $3.74 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2006 | -1.73x | $-2.52 Million | $1.45 Million | $3.98 Million | ▲ +45.1% |
| 2005 | -3.16x | $-2.10 Million | $666.00K | $2.77 Million | ▼ -623.9% |
| 2004 | 0.60x | $284.00K | $471.00K | $187.00K | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2003 | 0.74x | $525.00K | $707.00K | $182.00K | ▲ +146.5% |
| 2002 | 0.30x | $348.00K | $1.16 Million | $807.00K | ▲ +218.1% |
| 2001 | -0.26x | $-344.00K | $1.35 Million | $1.69 Million | ▼ -205.3% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | $299.00K | $1.23 Million | $935.00K | ▼ -3.1% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $300.00K | $1.20 Million | $900.00K | ▼ -50.0% |
| 1998 | 0.50x | $200.00K | $400.00K | $200.00K | ▲ +111.0% |
| 1994 | -4.55x | $-5.00 Million | $1.10 Million | $6.10 Million | ▲ +24.2% |
| 1992 | -6.00x | $-600.00K | $100.00K | $700.00K | — |