Marvell Technology Group Ltd (MRVL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Marvell Technology Group Ltd (MRVL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $638.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.73 Billion) in one year. Explore Marvell Technology Group Ltd long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Marvell Technology Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Marvell Technology Group Ltd across 30 annual periods. Also explore MRVL asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Marvell Technology Group Ltd (2000–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Marvell Technology Group Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Marvell Technology Group Ltd market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.22x | $1.75 Billion | $7.98 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2025 | 0.25x | $1.68 Billion | $6.78 Billion | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $1.37 Billion | $6.40 Billion | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $1.29 Billion | $6.88 Billion | ▲ +46.4% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $819.37 Million | $6.41 Billion | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $817.29 Million | $2.33 Billion | ▲ +139.1% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $360.30 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $596.74 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▼ -78.1% |
| 2018 | 1.01x | $571.11 Million | $566.87 Million | ▲ +274.5% |
| 2017 | -0.58x | $-358.44 Million | $621.00 Million | ▼ -466.0% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | $205.35 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -84.0% |
| 2015 | 0.99x | $728.94 Million | $738.30 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2014 | 0.59x | $448.04 Million | $765.60 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2013 | 0.94x | $729.04 Million | $777.17 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2012 | 1.02x | $771.25 Million | $753.60 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2011 | 1.46x | $1.19 Billion | $816.29 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2010 | 1.08x | $811.51 Million | $752.96 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2009 | 1.16x | $680.68 Million | $585.13 Million | ▲ +646.9% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $177.40 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $177.35 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $337.31 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -69.9% |
| 2006 | 0.86x | $402.30 Million | $467.19 Million | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2005 | 0.76x | $221.53 Million | $291.53 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2004 | 0.61x | $149.81 Million | $244.62 Million | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $40.82 Million | $150.16 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | $40.82 Million | $145.12 Million | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $50.02 Million | $101.33 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $50.02 Million | $101.33 Million | ▲ +267.7% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $12.19 Million | $90.82 Million | ▼ -59.1% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | $12.64 Million | $38.56 Million | — |