Marvell Technology Group Ltd (MRVL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Marvell Technology Group Ltd (MRVL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $582.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($7.52 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Marvell Technology Group Ltd to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Marvell Technology Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Marvell Technology Group Ltd across 29 annual periods. Also explore Marvell Technology Group Ltd net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Marvell Technology Group Ltd (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Marvell Technology Group Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Marvell Technology Group Ltd stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.25x | $1.68 Billion | $6.78 Billion | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $1.37 Billion | $6.40 Billion | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $1.29 Billion | $6.88 Billion | ▲ +46.4% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $819.37 Million | $6.41 Billion | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $817.29 Million | $2.33 Billion | ▲ +139.1% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $360.30 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $596.74 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▼ -78.1% |
| 2018 | 1.01x | $571.11 Million | $566.87 Million | ▲ +274.5% |
| 2017 | -0.58x | $-358.44 Million | $621.00 Million | ▼ -466.0% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | $205.35 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -84.0% |
| 2015 | 0.99x | $728.94 Million | $738.30 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2014 | 0.59x | $448.04 Million | $765.60 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2013 | 0.94x | $729.04 Million | $777.17 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2012 | 1.02x | $771.25 Million | $753.60 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2011 | 1.46x | $1.19 Billion | $816.29 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2010 | 1.08x | $811.51 Million | $752.96 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2009 | 1.16x | $680.68 Million | $585.13 Million | ▲ +646.9% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $177.40 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $177.35 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $337.31 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -69.9% |
| 2006 | 0.86x | $402.30 Million | $467.19 Million | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2005 | 0.76x | $221.53 Million | $291.53 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2004 | 0.61x | $149.81 Million | $244.62 Million | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $40.82 Million | $150.16 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | $40.82 Million | $145.12 Million | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $50.02 Million | $101.33 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $50.02 Million | $101.33 Million | ▲ +267.7% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $12.19 Million | $90.82 Million | ▼ -59.1% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | $12.64 Million | $38.56 Million | — |