Marvell Technology Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Marvell Technology Group Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Marvell Technology Group Ltd (MRVL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of July 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $605.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.02 Billion) in one year. Check Marvell Technology Group Ltd (MRVL) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Marvell Technology Group Ltd (2000–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Marvell Technology Group Ltd from 2000 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Marvell Technology Group Ltd across 30 annual periods. Check Marvell Technology Group Ltd cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Marvell Technology Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2000–2026)
Marvell Technology Group Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2000 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Marvell Technology Group Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Marvell Technology Group Ltd generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.22x | $1.75 Billion | $7.98 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2025 | 0.25x | $1.68 Billion | $6.78 Billion | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $1.37 Billion | $6.40 Billion | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $1.29 Billion | $6.88 Billion | ▲ +46.4% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $819.37 Million | $6.41 Billion | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $817.29 Million | $2.33 Billion | ▲ +139.1% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $360.30 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $596.74 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▼ -78.1% |
| 2018 | 1.01x | $571.11 Million | $566.87 Million | ▲ +274.5% |
| 2017 | -0.58x | $-358.44 Million | $621.00 Million | ▼ -466.0% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | $205.35 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -84.0% |
| 2015 | 0.99x | $728.94 Million | $738.30 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2014 | 0.59x | $448.04 Million | $765.60 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2013 | 0.94x | $729.04 Million | $777.17 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2012 | 1.02x | $771.25 Million | $753.60 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2011 | 1.46x | $1.19 Billion | $816.29 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2010 | 1.08x | $811.51 Million | $752.96 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2009 | 1.16x | $680.68 Million | $585.13 Million | ▲ +646.9% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $177.40 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $177.35 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $337.31 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -69.9% |
| 2006 | 0.86x | $402.30 Million | $467.19 Million | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2005 | 0.76x | $221.53 Million | $291.53 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2004 | 0.61x | $149.81 Million | $244.62 Million | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $40.82 Million | $150.16 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | $40.82 Million | $145.12 Million | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $50.02 Million | $101.33 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $50.02 Million | $101.33 Million | ▲ +267.7% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $12.19 Million | $90.82 Million | ▼ -59.1% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | $12.64 Million | $38.56 Million | — |