Marvell Technology Group Ltd (MRVL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Marvell Technology Group Ltd (MRVL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of July 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $605.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.02 Billion) in one year. See Marvell Technology Group Ltd financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Marvell Technology Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Marvell Technology Group Ltd across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Marvell Technology Group Ltd cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Marvell Technology Group Ltd (2000–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Marvell Technology Group Ltd. Check MRVL cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.22x | $1.75 Billion | $7.98 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2025 | 0.25x | $1.68 Billion | $6.78 Billion | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $1.37 Billion | $6.40 Billion | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $1.29 Billion | $6.88 Billion | ▲ +46.4% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $819.37 Million | $6.41 Billion | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2021 | 0.35x | $817.29 Million | $2.33 Billion | ▲ +139.1% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $360.30 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▼ -33.3% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $596.74 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▼ -78.1% |
| 2018 | 1.01x | $571.11 Million | $566.87 Million | ▲ +274.5% |
| 2017 | -0.58x | $-358.44 Million | $621.00 Million | ▼ -466.0% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | $205.35 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -84.0% |
| 2015 | 0.99x | $728.94 Million | $738.30 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 2014 | 0.59x | $448.04 Million | $765.60 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2013 | 0.94x | $729.04 Million | $777.17 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2012 | 1.02x | $771.25 Million | $753.60 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2011 | 1.46x | $1.19 Billion | $816.29 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2010 | 1.08x | $811.51 Million | $752.96 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2009 | 1.16x | $680.68 Million | $585.13 Million | ▲ +646.9% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $177.40 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $177.35 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $337.31 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -69.9% |
| 2006 | 0.86x | $402.30 Million | $467.19 Million | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2005 | 0.76x | $221.53 Million | $291.53 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2004 | 0.61x | $149.81 Million | $244.62 Million | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $40.82 Million | $150.16 Million | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2003 | 0.28x | $40.82 Million | $145.12 Million | ▼ -43.0% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $50.02 Million | $101.33 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $50.02 Million | $101.33 Million | ▲ +267.7% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $12.19 Million | $90.82 Million | ▼ -59.1% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | $12.64 Million | $38.56 Million | — |