Ohio Valley Banc Corp (OVBC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ohio Valley Banc Corp (OVBC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $7.78 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.41 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Ohio Valley Banc Corp to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Ohio Valley Banc Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Ohio Valley Banc Corp across 30 annual periods. Also explore Ohio Valley Banc Corp (OVBC) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ohio Valley Banc Corp (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ohio Valley Banc Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Ohio Valley Banc Corp stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $18.06 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +32.1% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $13.10 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▼ -43.6% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $20.75 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -97.0% |
| 2022 | 0.58x | $15.99 Million | $27.74 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2021 | 0.45x | $13.14 Million | $29.31 Million | ▲ +33.6% |
| 2020 | 0.34x | $12.49 Million | $37.24 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2019 | 0.34x | $14.75 Million | $43.54 Million | ▲ +1604.4% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $18.14 Million | $912.62 Million | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $14.50 Million | $916.93 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $13.37 Million | $850.11 Million | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $10.40 Million | $705.82 Million | ▼ -12.7% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $11.68 Million | $692.45 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $13.16 Million | $666.95 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $10.83 Million | $692.65 Million | ▼ -29.2% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $16.18 Million | $732.33 Million | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $12.33 Million | $783.39 Million | ▲ +138.1% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $4.93 Million | $745.47 Million | ▼ -49.2% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $9.35 Million | $718.05 Million | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $11.29 Million | $721.91 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $12.14 Million | $704.08 Million | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $10.53 Million | $690.45 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $10.56 Million | $672.54 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $13.22 Million | $652.92 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $10.57 Million | $632.48 Million | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $8.79 Million | $583.70 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $6.12 Million | $512.17 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $6.30 Million | $479.40 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | $7.80 Million | $406.70 Million | ▲ +19.4% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $5.50 Million | $342.30 Million | ▼ -7.6% |
| 1996 | 0.02x | $5.40 Million | $310.50 Million | — |