Peabody Energy Corp (BTU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Peabody Energy Corp (BTU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $30.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.17 Billion) in one year. See Peabody Energy Corp (BTU) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Peabody Energy Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Peabody Energy Corp across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Peabody Energy Corp cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Peabody Energy Corp (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Peabody Energy Corp. Check cash flow quality index of Peabody Energy Corp to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.43x | $949.70 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +58.0% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $606.50 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2023 | 0.44x | $1.04 Billion | $2.35 Billion | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2022 | 0.51x | $1.17 Billion | $2.32 Billion | ▲ +277.5% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $420.00 Million | $3.13 Billion | ▲ +5200.4% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-9.70 Million | $3.69 Billion | ▼ -101.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $677.40 Million | $3.87 Billion | ▼ -53.3% |
| 2018 | 0.38x | $1.49 Billion | $3.97 Billion | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $1.01 Billion | $4.53 Billion | ▲ +4941.4% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | $-52.80 Million | $11.44 Billion | ▼ -223.8% |
| 2015 | 0.00x | $-14.40 Million | $10.10 Billion | ▼ -104.4% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $336.60 Million | $10.46 Billion | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $722.40 Million | $10.19 Billion | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $1.52 Billion | $10.97 Billion | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $1.63 Billion | $11.22 Billion | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $1.09 Billion | $6.67 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $1.05 Billion | $6.20 Billion | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $1.29 Billion | $6.92 Billion | ▲ +320.0% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $316.37 Million | $7.15 Billion | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $595.73 Million | $7.14 Billion | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $702.76 Million | $4.67 Billion | ▲ +136.1% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $283.76 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $188.86 Million | $4.15 Billion | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $231.20 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $151.98 Million | $4.07 Billion | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $262.91 Million | $5.28 Billion | ▲ +19.8% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $270.51 Million | $6.50 Billion | ▲ +6.6% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $181.68 Million | $4.66 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $181.68 Million | $4.66 Billion | — |