Peabody Energy Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Peabody Energy Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Peabody Energy Corp (BTU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $30.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.17 Billion) in one year. Check BTU cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Peabody Energy Corp (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Peabody Energy Corp from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Peabody Energy Corp across 29 annual periods. Check BTU cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Peabody Energy Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Peabody Energy Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Peabody Energy Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Peabody Energy Corp operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.43x | $949.70 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +58.0% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $606.50 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2023 | 0.44x | $1.04 Billion | $2.35 Billion | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2022 | 0.51x | $1.17 Billion | $2.32 Billion | ▲ +277.5% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $420.00 Million | $3.13 Billion | ▲ +5200.4% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-9.70 Million | $3.69 Billion | ▼ -101.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $677.40 Million | $3.87 Billion | ▼ -53.3% |
| 2018 | 0.38x | $1.49 Billion | $3.97 Billion | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $1.01 Billion | $4.53 Billion | ▲ +4941.4% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | $-52.80 Million | $11.44 Billion | ▼ -223.8% |
| 2015 | 0.00x | $-14.40 Million | $10.10 Billion | ▼ -104.4% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $336.60 Million | $10.46 Billion | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $722.40 Million | $10.19 Billion | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $1.52 Billion | $10.97 Billion | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $1.63 Billion | $11.22 Billion | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $1.09 Billion | $6.67 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $1.05 Billion | $6.20 Billion | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $1.29 Billion | $6.92 Billion | ▲ +320.0% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $316.37 Million | $7.15 Billion | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $595.73 Million | $7.14 Billion | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $702.76 Million | $4.67 Billion | ▲ +136.1% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $283.76 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $188.86 Million | $4.15 Billion | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $231.20 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $151.98 Million | $4.07 Billion | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $262.91 Million | $5.28 Billion | ▲ +19.8% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $270.51 Million | $6.50 Billion | ▲ +6.6% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $181.68 Million | $4.66 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $181.68 Million | $4.66 Billion | — |