Peabody Energy Corp (BTU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Peabody Energy Corp (BTU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $30.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.17 Billion) in one year. See Peabody Energy Corp free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Peabody Energy Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Peabody Energy Corp across 29 annual periods. Also explore BTU year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Peabody Energy Corp (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Peabody Energy Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Peabody Energy Corp market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.43x | $949.70 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +58.0% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | $606.50 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2023 | 0.44x | $1.04 Billion | $2.35 Billion | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2022 | 0.51x | $1.17 Billion | $2.32 Billion | ▲ +277.5% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $420.00 Million | $3.13 Billion | ▲ +5200.4% |
| 2020 | 0.00x | $-9.70 Million | $3.69 Billion | ▼ -101.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $677.40 Million | $3.87 Billion | ▼ -53.3% |
| 2018 | 0.38x | $1.49 Billion | $3.97 Billion | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $1.01 Billion | $4.53 Billion | ▲ +4941.4% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | $-52.80 Million | $11.44 Billion | ▼ -223.8% |
| 2015 | 0.00x | $-14.40 Million | $10.10 Billion | ▼ -104.4% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $336.60 Million | $10.46 Billion | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $722.40 Million | $10.19 Billion | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $1.52 Billion | $10.97 Billion | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $1.63 Billion | $11.22 Billion | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $1.09 Billion | $6.67 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $1.05 Billion | $6.20 Billion | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $1.29 Billion | $6.92 Billion | ▲ +320.0% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $316.37 Million | $7.15 Billion | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $595.73 Million | $7.14 Billion | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | $702.76 Million | $4.67 Billion | ▲ +136.1% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $283.76 Million | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $188.86 Million | $4.15 Billion | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $231.20 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $151.98 Million | $4.07 Billion | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $262.91 Million | $5.28 Billion | ▲ +19.8% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $270.51 Million | $6.50 Billion | ▲ +6.6% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $181.68 Million | $4.66 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $181.68 Million | $4.66 Billion | — |