Peabody Energy Corp (BTU) — Net Asset Quality Index
Peabody Energy Corp (BTU) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 62.0% as of March 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $5.71 Billion minus total liabilities of $2.17 Billion yields net assets of $3.54 Billion. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check BTU cash and liquid asset ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Peabody Energy Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2025)
This chart shows how Peabody Energy Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of March 2026, the index stands at 62.0%, representing net assets of $3.54 Billion against total assets of $5.71 Billion USD. See Peabody Energy Corp current assets vs equity to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Peabody Energy Corp (1997–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Peabody Energy Corp from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Peabody Energy Corp market cap and net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 61.7% | $3.58 Billion | $5.81 Billion | $2.23 Billion | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2024 | 62.3% | $3.71 Billion | $5.95 Billion | $2.24 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2023 | 60.5% | $3.61 Billion | $5.96 Billion | $2.35 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2022 | 58.7% | $3.29 Billion | $5.61 Billion | $2.32 Billion | ▲ +21.9 pp |
| 2021 | 36.8% | $1.82 Billion | $4.95 Billion | $3.13 Billion | ▲ +15.8 pp |
| 2020 | 21.0% | $981.30 Million | $4.67 Billion | $3.69 Billion | ▼ -19.8 pp |
| 2019 | 40.8% | $2.67 Billion | $6.54 Billion | $3.87 Billion | ▼ -5.6 pp |
| 2018 | 46.5% | $3.45 Billion | $7.42 Billion | $3.97 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2017 | 44.7% | $3.66 Billion | $8.18 Billion | $4.53 Billion | ▲ +41.8 pp |
| 2016 | 2.9% | $337.80 Million | $11.78 Billion | $11.44 Billion | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 2015 | 7.9% | $869.90 Million | $10.97 Billion | $10.10 Billion | ▼ -12.7 pp |
| 2014 | 20.7% | $2.73 Billion | $13.19 Billion | $10.46 Billion | ▼ -7.3 pp |
| 2013 | 27.9% | $3.95 Billion | $14.13 Billion | $10.19 Billion | ▼ -3.1 pp |
| 2012 | 31.0% | $4.94 Billion | $15.91 Billion | $10.97 Billion | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2011 | 33.0% | $5.52 Billion | $16.73 Billion | $11.22 Billion | ▼ -8.3 pp |
| 2010 | 41.3% | $4.69 Billion | $11.36 Billion | $6.67 Billion | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2009 | 37.7% | $3.76 Billion | $9.96 Billion | $6.20 Billion | ▲ +8.2 pp |
| 2008 | 29.6% | $2.91 Billion | $9.82 Billion | $6.92 Billion | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2007 | 26.1% | $2.52 Billion | $9.67 Billion | $7.15 Billion | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2006 | 24.9% | $2.37 Billion | $9.51 Billion | $7.14 Billion | ▼ -6.9 pp |
| 2005 | 31.8% | $2.18 Billion | $6.85 Billion | $4.67 Billion | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2004 | 27.9% | $1.73 Billion | $6.18 Billion | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +6.5 pp |
| 2003 | 21.5% | $1.13 Billion | $5.28 Billion | $4.15 Billion | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2002 | 21.8% | $1.12 Billion | $5.14 Billion | $4.02 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2001 | 21.0% | $1.08 Billion | $5.15 Billion | $4.07 Billion | ▲ +11.6 pp |
| 2000 | 9.4% | $549.69 Million | $5.83 Billion | $5.28 Billion | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 1999 | 7.4% | $519.14 Million | $7.02 Billion | $6.50 Billion | ▼ -19.2 pp |
| 1998 | 26.6% | $1.69 Billion | $6.34 Billion | $4.66 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 26.6% | $1.69 Billion | $6.34 Billion | $4.66 Billion | — |