Brinker International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Brinker International Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Brinker International Inc (EAT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $232.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.37 Billion) in one year. Check EAT cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Brinker International Inc (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Brinker International Inc from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Brinker International Inc across 37 annual periods. Check Brinker International Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Brinker International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Brinker International Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Brinker International Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Brinker International Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $679.00 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▲ +78.1% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $421.90 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▲ +69.6% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $256.30 Million | $2.63 Billion | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $252.20 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▼ -36.1% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $369.70 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▲ +65.9% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | $245.00 Million | $2.84 Billion | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $212.70 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $284.45 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $312.89 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $394.70 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $368.61 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2014 | 0.25x | $359.84 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | $290.69 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2012 | 0.27x | $303.44 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $259.99 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2010 | 0.30x | $336.44 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $274.54 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2008 | 0.23x | $361.54 Million | $1.60 Billion | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $484.98 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2006 | 0.41x | $475.55 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2005 | 0.42x | $443.48 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2004 | 0.39x | $481.22 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▼ -30.7% |
| 2003 | 0.56x | $448.87 Million | $804.44 Million | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2002 | 0.48x | $390.03 Million | $806.24 Million | ▲ +6.8% |
| 2001 | 0.45x | $246.81 Million | $545.03 Million | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2000 | 0.67x | $268.99 Million | $400.12 Million | ▲ +47.6% |
| 1999 | 0.46x | $193.20 Million | $424.20 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 1998 | 0.54x | $200.90 Million | $375.10 Million | ▲ +83.3% |
| 1997 | 0.29x | $138.30 Million | $473.20 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 1996 | 0.41x | $114.90 Million | $280.60 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 1995 | 0.43x | $101.60 Million | $236.00 Million | ▼ -51.5% |
| 1994 | 0.89x | $125.50 Million | $141.40 Million | ▼ -16.7% |
| 1993 | 1.07x | $107.20 Million | $100.60 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 1992 | 0.94x | $77.90 Million | $83.20 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 1991 | 0.82x | $48.10 Million | $58.80 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 1990 | 0.61x | $39.70 Million | $65.30 Million | ▲ +45.6% |
| 1989 | 0.42x | $31.40 Million | $75.20 Million | — |