Brinker International Inc (EAT) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Brinker International Inc (EAT) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 96.1% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($15.90 Million) from net assets ($406.00 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See shareholders equity of Brinker International Inc for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Brinker International Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1986–2025)
This chart shows how Brinker International Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 31 annual periods from 1986 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 96.1%, reflecting net assets of $406.00 Million with intangible assets of $15.90 Million USD. Also explore Brinker International Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Brinker International Inc (1986–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Brinker International Inc from 1986 to 2025, covering 31 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see EAT company net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 95.3% | $370.90 Million | $17.40 Million | $2.68 Billion | ▲ +45.8 pp |
| 2024 | 49.5% | $39.40 Million | $19.90 Million | $2.59 Billion | ▼ -20.6 pp |
| 2014 | 70.1% | $63.09 Million | $18.84 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -22.7 pp |
| 2013 | 92.8% | $149.36 Million | $10.70 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +34.7 pp |
| 2012 | 58.1% | $309.87 Million | $129.71 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▼ -13.6 pp |
| 2011 | 71.7% | $438.91 Million | $124.09 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -11.2 pp |
| 2010 | 83.0% | $728.75 Million | $124.09 Million | $1.85 Billion | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2009 | 79.8% | $646.92 Million | $130.72 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2008 | 76.4% | $595.09 Million | $140.37 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▼ -6.3 pp |
| 2007 | 82.8% | $805.09 Million | $138.88 Million | $2.32 Billion | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 2006 | 86.5% | $1.08 Billion | $145.48 Million | $2.22 Billion | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2005 | 87.7% | $1.10 Billion | $135.75 Million | $2.16 Billion | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2004 | 84.4% | $1.01 Billion | $158.07 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2003 | 83.8% | $1.14 Billion | $185.07 Million | $1.94 Billion | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2002 | 80.2% | $977.10 Million | $193.90 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▼ -4.5 pp |
| 2001 | 84.7% | $900.29 Million | $138.13 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2000 | 90.6% | $762.21 Million | $71.56 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 1999 | 88.8% | $661.40 Million | $74.20 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 1998 | 87.1% | $593.70 Million | $76.30 Million | $968.80 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 1997 | 85.0% | $523.70 Million | $78.30 Million | $996.90 Million | ▼ -2.9 pp |
| 1996 | 87.9% | $608.20 Million | $73.30 Million | $888.80 Million | ▼ -12.1 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $496.80 Million | $0.00 | $732.80 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1994 | 100.0% | $417.30 Million | $0.00 | $558.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1993 | 100.0% | $334.70 Million | $0.00 | $435.30 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1992 | 100.0% | $254.10 Million | $0.00 | $337.30 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1991 | 100.0% | $207.50 Million | $0.00 | $266.30 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1990 | 100.0% | $132.40 Million | $0.00 | $197.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1989 | 100.0% | $78.50 Million | $0.00 | $153.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1988 | 100.0% | $60.30 Million | $0.00 | $127.30 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1987 | 100.0% | $49.00 Million | $0.00 | $111.30 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1986 | 100.0% | $38.50 Million | $0.00 | $63.10 Million | — |