Brinker International Inc (EAT) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Brinker International Inc (EAT) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 568.2% as of December 2025. Strategic assets (PP&E of $2.16 Billion plus long-term investments of $-) total $2.16 Billion, measured against net assets of $379.30 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Brinker International Inc Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2025)
This chart shows how Brinker International Inc's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2000 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at 568.2%, representing strategic assets of $2.16 Billion against net assets of $379.30 Million USD. Explore Brinker International Inc (EAT) cash conversion ratio to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Brinker International Inc (2000–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Brinker International Inc from 2000 to 2025, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see how much is Brinker International Inc worth.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 566.7% | $2.10 Billion | $2.10 Billion | $- | $370.90 Million | ▼ -4445.8 pp |
| 2024 | 5012.4% | $1.97 Billion | $1.97 Billion | $- | $39.40 Million | ▲ +3338.0 pp |
| 2014 | 1674.4% | $1.06 Billion | $1.06 Billion | $- | $63.09 Million | ▲ +980.9 pp |
| 2013 | 693.5% | $1.04 Billion | $1.04 Billion | $- | $149.36 Million | ▲ +356.7 pp |
| 2012 | 336.8% | $1.04 Billion | $1.04 Billion | $- | $309.87 Million | ▲ +96.1 pp |
| 2011 | 240.7% | $1.06 Billion | $1.06 Billion | $- | $438.91 Million | ▲ +85.7 pp |
| 2010 | 154.9% | $1.13 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $- | $728.75 Million | ▼ -61.5 pp |
| 2009 | 216.5% | $1.40 Billion | $1.40 Billion | $- | $646.92 Million | ▼ -40.8 pp |
| 2008 | 257.3% | $1.53 Billion | $1.53 Billion | $- | $595.09 Million | ▲ +37.4 pp |
| 2007 | 219.9% | $1.77 Billion | $1.77 Billion | $- | $805.09 Million | ▲ +53.3 pp |
| 2006 | 166.6% | $1.79 Billion | $1.79 Billion | $- | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +11.4 pp |
| 2005 | 155.2% | $1.71 Billion | $1.71 Billion | $- | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2004 | 155.1% | $1.57 Billion | $1.57 Billion | $- | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +23.6 pp |
| 2003 | 131.5% | $1.50 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $- | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -7.2 pp |
| 2002 | 138.7% | $1.36 Billion | $1.36 Billion | $- | $977.10 Million | ▲ +18.2 pp |
| 2001 | 120.5% | $1.08 Billion | $1.08 Billion | $- | $900.29 Million | ▲ +4.0 pp |
| 2000 | 116.5% | $888.13 Million | $888.13 Million | $- | $762.21 Million | — |