Levi Strauss & Co Class A (LEVI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Levi Strauss & Co Class A (LEVI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $282.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.57 Billion) in one year. See LEVI cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Levi Strauss & Co Class A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2000–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Levi Strauss & Co Class A across 26 annual periods. Also explore Levi Strauss & Co Class A annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Levi Strauss & Co Class A (2000–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Levi Strauss & Co Class A. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see LEVI market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $545.70 Million | $4.57 Billion | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | $898.40 Million | $4.41 Billion | ▲ +87.7% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $435.50 Million | $4.01 Billion | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $228.10 Million | $4.13 Billion | ▼ -68.3% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $737.26 Million | $4.23 Billion | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $469.59 Million | $4.34 Billion | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $412.19 Million | $2.66 Billion | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | $420.37 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $525.94 Million | $2.53 Billion | ▲ +62.8% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $306.55 Million | $2.40 Billion | ▲ +45.5% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $218.33 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2014 | 0.08x | $232.91 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $411.27 Million | $2.95 Billion | ▼ -14.2% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $530.98 Million | $3.27 Billion | ▲ +30923.6% |
| 2011 | 0.00x | $1.80 Million | $3.44 Billion | ▼ -98.8% |
| 2010 | 0.04x | $146.30 Million | $3.35 Billion | ▼ -62.7% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | $388.80 Million | $3.32 Billion | ▲ +62.8% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $224.80 Million | $3.13 Billion | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2007 | 0.09x | $302.30 Million | $3.24 Billion | ▲ +35.0% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $261.90 Million | $3.80 Billion | ▲ +735.7% |
| 2005 | -0.01x | $-43.80 Million | $4.04 Billion | ▼ -123.1% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $199.90 Million | $4.26 Billion | ▲ +226.7% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | $-162.20 Million | $4.38 Billion | ▼ -177.6% |
| 2002 | 0.05x | $191.70 Million | $4.01 Billion | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $141.90 Million | $3.92 Billion | ▼ -49.1% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $305.90 Million | $4.30 Billion | — |