Telecom Argentina SA ADR (TEO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Telecom Argentina SA ADR (TEO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $947.05 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.33 Trillion) in one year. See Telecom Argentina SA ADR (TEO) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Telecom Argentina SA ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Telecom Argentina SA ADR across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Telecom Argentina SA ADR cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Telecom Argentina SA ADR (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Telecom Argentina SA ADR. Check TEO cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $2.18 Trillion | $9.64 Trillion | ▲ +50.8% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $811.50 Billion | $5.41 Trillion | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | $1.77 Trillion | $7.04 Trillion | ▲ +235.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $214.02 Billion | $2.85 Trillion | ▼ -40.6% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $130.03 Billion | $1.03 Trillion | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2020 | 0.28x | $101.33 Billion | $363.20 Billion | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2019 | 0.31x | $81.93 Billion | $268.30 Billion | ▼ -38.0% |
| 2018 | 0.49x | $70.38 Billion | $142.82 Billion | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2017 | 1.04x | $35.10 Billion | $33.71 Billion | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2016 | 0.93x | $25.98 Billion | $28.04 Billion | ▲ +183.7% |
| 2015 | 0.33x | $6.81 Billion | $20.86 Billion | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2014 | 0.50x | $5.72 Billion | $11.55 Billion | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2013 | 0.63x | $6.98 Billion | $11.08 Billion | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2012 | 0.66x | $5.03 Billion | $7.65 Billion | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2011 | 0.74x | $5.32 Billion | $7.15 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2010 | 0.73x | $4.24 Billion | $5.81 Billion | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2009 | 0.70x | $3.69 Billion | $5.26 Billion | ▲ +17.3% |
| 2008 | 0.60x | $3.32 Billion | $5.56 Billion | ▲ +22.9% |
| 2007 | 0.49x | $2.95 Billion | $6.06 Billion | ▲ +32.0% |
| 2006 | 0.37x | $2.40 Billion | $6.51 Billion | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $1.97 Billion | $6.65 Billion | ▲ +60.8% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | $2.18 Billion | $11.86 Billion | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | $2.02 Billion | $11.15 Billion | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $1.67 Billion | $12.13 Billion | ▼ -76.0% |
| 2001 | 0.57x | $2.43 Billion | $4.24 Billion | ▲ +122.4% |
| 2000 | 0.26x | $1.24 Billion | $4.79 Billion | ▼ -21.4% |
| 1999 | 0.33x | $1.43 Billion | $4.35 Billion | ▼ -7.0% |
| 1998 | 0.35x | $1.25 Billion | $3.55 Billion | — |