Triumph Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Triumph Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Triumph Group Inc (TGI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $147.64 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.70 Billion) in one year. Check TGI cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Triumph Group Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Triumph Group Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Triumph Group Inc across 31 annual periods. Check TGI capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Triumph Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Triumph Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Triumph Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Triumph Group Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $37.88 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +321.8% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $9.44 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +125.4% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-52.25 Million | $2.51 Billion | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2022 | -0.05x | $-137.02 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2021 | -0.05x | $-173.12 Million | $3.27 Billion | ▼ -306.0% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $96.67 Million | $3.76 Billion | ▲ +150.8% |
| 2019 | -0.05x | $-174.42 Million | $3.45 Billion | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | $-288.89 Million | $3.35 Billion | ▼ -209.3% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $281.52 Million | $3.57 Billion | ▲ +267.6% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $83.86 Million | $3.91 Billion | ▼ -81.9% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $467.33 Million | $3.95 Billion | ▲ +186.4% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $135.14 Million | $3.27 Billion | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $320.92 Million | $3.10 Billion | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $227.78 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $142.30 Million | $2.84 Billion | ▼ -74.8% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $169.65 Million | $850.93 Million | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $135.00 Million | $813.26 Million | ▲ +134.5% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $51.12 Million | $722.11 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $46.24 Million | $601.79 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $40.37 Million | $411.08 Million | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $65.00 Million | $411.05 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $45.65 Million | $420.73 Million | ▼ -38.4% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | $65.00 Million | $369.18 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | $77.83 Million | $319.46 Million | ▲ +217.2% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $26.22 Million | $341.48 Million | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $36.66 Million | $262.56 Million | ▼ -12.6% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $34.20 Million | $214.10 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | $13.60 Million | $118.50 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 1997 | 0.10x | $8.10 Million | $79.90 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $16.10 Million | $143.60 Million | ▲ +107.0% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $5.60 Million | $103.40 Million | — |