Triumph Group Inc (TGI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Triumph Group Inc (TGI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $147.64 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.70 Billion) in one year. See Triumph Group Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Triumph Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Triumph Group Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore Triumph Group Inc (TGI) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Triumph Group Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Triumph Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TGI stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $37.88 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▲ +321.8% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $9.44 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +125.4% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-52.25 Million | $2.51 Billion | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2022 | -0.05x | $-137.02 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2021 | -0.05x | $-173.12 Million | $3.27 Billion | ▼ -306.0% |
| 2020 | 0.03x | $96.67 Million | $3.76 Billion | ▲ +150.8% |
| 2019 | -0.05x | $-174.42 Million | $3.45 Billion | ▲ +41.4% |
| 2018 | -0.09x | $-288.89 Million | $3.35 Billion | ▼ -209.3% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $281.52 Million | $3.57 Billion | ▲ +267.6% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $83.86 Million | $3.91 Billion | ▼ -81.9% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $467.33 Million | $3.95 Billion | ▲ +186.4% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $135.14 Million | $3.27 Billion | ▼ -60.0% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $320.92 Million | $3.10 Billion | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $227.78 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▲ +67.5% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $142.30 Million | $2.84 Billion | ▼ -74.8% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $169.65 Million | $850.93 Million | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $135.00 Million | $813.26 Million | ▲ +134.5% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $51.12 Million | $722.11 Million | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $46.24 Million | $601.79 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $40.37 Million | $411.08 Million | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $65.00 Million | $411.05 Million | ▲ +45.7% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $45.65 Million | $420.73 Million | ▼ -38.4% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | $65.00 Million | $369.18 Million | ▼ -27.7% |
| 2002 | 0.24x | $77.83 Million | $319.46 Million | ▲ +217.2% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $26.22 Million | $341.48 Million | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $36.66 Million | $262.56 Million | ▼ -12.6% |
| 1999 | 0.16x | $34.20 Million | $214.10 Million | ▲ +39.2% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | $13.60 Million | $118.50 Million | ▲ +13.2% |
| 1997 | 0.10x | $8.10 Million | $79.90 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $16.10 Million | $143.60 Million | ▲ +107.0% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $5.60 Million | $103.40 Million | — |