Triumph Group Inc (TGI) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Triumph Group Inc (TGI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -11.2% as of March 2018. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($507.68 Million) from net assets ($456.57 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Triumph Group Inc current assets vs equity to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Triumph Group Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1995–2018)
This chart shows how Triumph Group Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 24 annual periods from 1995 to 2018. As of March 2018, the ratio stands at -11.2%, reflecting net assets of $456.57 Million with intangible assets of $507.68 Million USD. See operational self-sufficiency of Triumph Group Inc to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Triumph Group Inc (1995–2018)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Triumph Group Inc from 1995 to 2018, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see TGI company net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | -11.2% | $456.57 Million | $507.68 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -41.2 pp |
| 2017 | 30.0% | $846.47 Million | $592.36 Million | $4.41 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2016 | 30.9% | $940.00 Million | $649.61 Million | $4.85 Billion | ▼ -24.3 pp |
| 2015 | 55.2% | $2.13 Billion | $957.39 Million | $6.08 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2014 | 57.2% | $2.28 Billion | $978.18 Million | $5.55 Billion | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2013 | 54.6% | $2.05 Billion | $929.41 Million | $5.15 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2012 | 53.7% | $1.79 Billion | $829.67 Million | $4.51 Billion | ▲ +6.4 pp |
| 2011 | 47.3% | $1.63 Billion | $859.62 Million | $4.47 Billion | ▼ -43.4 pp |
| 2010 | 90.7% | $860.69 Million | $79.84 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2009 | 86.1% | $779.65 Million | $108.35 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2008 | 88.7% | $692.73 Million | $78.49 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2007 | 88.9% | $627.36 Million | $69.92 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2006 | 91.2% | $563.70 Million | $49.42 Million | $974.78 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2005 | 89.3% | $526.66 Million | $56.23 Million | $937.72 Million | ▲ +46.6 pp |
| 2004 | 42.7% | $515.12 Million | $295.13 Million | $935.85 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2003 | 41.1% | $494.99 Million | $291.52 Million | $864.17 Million | ▼ -51.2 pp |
| 2002 | 92.3% | $453.50 Million | $34.95 Million | $772.97 Million | ▲ +12.8 pp |
| 2001 | 79.5% | $389.89 Million | $79.83 Million | $731.37 Million | ▲ +49.3 pp |
| 2000 | 30.3% | $244.37 Million | $170.43 Million | $506.93 Million | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 1999 | 34.1% | $214.80 Million | $141.50 Million | $428.90 Million | ▼ -25.7 pp |
| 1998 | 59.9% | $182.90 Million | $73.40 Million | $301.40 Million | ▼ -12.1 pp |
| 1997 | 72.0% | $91.40 Million | $25.60 Million | $171.30 Million | ▲ +67.5 pp |
| 1996 | 4.5% | $17.80 Million | $17.00 Million | $161.40 Million | ▼ -81.8 pp |
| 1995 | 86.3% | $8.00 Million | $1.10 Million | $111.40 Million | — |