Triumph Group Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Triumph Group Inc tangible net worth ratio. Triumph Group Inc (TGI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -11.2% as of March 2018. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($507.68 Million) from net assets ($456.57 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check TGI strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Triumph Group Inc (1995–2018)
Tangible net worth ratio of Triumph Group Inc from 1995 to 2018. This chart shows how Triumph Group Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 24 annual periods from 1995 to 2018. As of March 2018, the ratio stands at -11.2%, reflecting net assets of $456.57 Million with intangible assets of $507.68 Million USD. See TGI current assets to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Triumph Group Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1995–2018)
Triumph Group Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 1995 to 2018. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Triumph Group Inc from 1995 to 2018, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Triumph Group Inc (TGI) market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | -11.2% | $456.57 Million | $507.68 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -41.2 pp |
| 2017 | 30.0% | $846.47 Million | $592.36 Million | $4.41 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2016 | 30.9% | $940.00 Million | $649.61 Million | $4.85 Billion | ▼ -24.3 pp |
| 2015 | 55.2% | $2.13 Billion | $957.39 Million | $6.08 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2014 | 57.2% | $2.28 Billion | $978.18 Million | $5.55 Billion | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2013 | 54.6% | $2.05 Billion | $929.41 Million | $5.15 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2012 | 53.7% | $1.79 Billion | $829.67 Million | $4.51 Billion | ▲ +6.4 pp |
| 2011 | 47.3% | $1.63 Billion | $859.62 Million | $4.47 Billion | ▼ -43.4 pp |
| 2010 | 90.7% | $860.69 Million | $79.84 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2009 | 86.1% | $779.65 Million | $108.35 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2008 | 88.7% | $692.73 Million | $78.49 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2007 | 88.9% | $627.36 Million | $69.92 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2006 | 91.2% | $563.70 Million | $49.42 Million | $974.78 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2005 | 89.3% | $526.66 Million | $56.23 Million | $937.72 Million | ▲ +46.6 pp |
| 2004 | 42.7% | $515.12 Million | $295.13 Million | $935.85 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2003 | 41.1% | $494.99 Million | $291.52 Million | $864.17 Million | ▼ -51.2 pp |
| 2002 | 92.3% | $453.50 Million | $34.95 Million | $772.97 Million | ▲ +12.8 pp |
| 2001 | 79.5% | $389.89 Million | $79.83 Million | $731.37 Million | ▲ +49.3 pp |
| 2000 | 30.3% | $244.37 Million | $170.43 Million | $506.93 Million | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 1999 | 34.1% | $214.80 Million | $141.50 Million | $428.90 Million | ▼ -25.7 pp |
| 1998 | 59.9% | $182.90 Million | $73.40 Million | $301.40 Million | ▼ -12.1 pp |
| 1997 | 72.0% | $91.40 Million | $25.60 Million | $171.30 Million | ▲ +67.5 pp |
| 1996 | 4.5% | $17.80 Million | $17.00 Million | $161.40 Million | ▼ -81.8 pp |
| 1995 | 86.3% | $8.00 Million | $1.10 Million | $111.40 Million | — |