Triumph Group Inc (TGI) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Triumph Group Inc (TGI) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -11.2% as of March 2018. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($507.68 Million) from net assets ($456.57 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See Triumph Group Inc book value and equity for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Triumph Group Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1995–2018)
This chart shows how Triumph Group Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 24 annual periods from 1995 to 2018. As of March 2018, the ratio stands at -11.2%, reflecting net assets of $456.57 Million with intangible assets of $507.68 Million USD. Also explore Triumph Group Inc (TGI) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Triumph Group Inc (1995–2018)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Triumph Group Inc from 1995 to 2018, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see how much is Triumph Group Inc worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | -11.2% | $456.57 Million | $507.68 Million | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -41.2 pp |
| 2017 | 30.0% | $846.47 Million | $592.36 Million | $4.41 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2016 | 30.9% | $940.00 Million | $649.61 Million | $4.85 Billion | ▼ -24.3 pp |
| 2015 | 55.2% | $2.13 Billion | $957.39 Million | $6.08 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2014 | 57.2% | $2.28 Billion | $978.18 Million | $5.55 Billion | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2013 | 54.6% | $2.05 Billion | $929.41 Million | $5.15 Billion | ▲ +0.8 pp |
| 2012 | 53.7% | $1.79 Billion | $829.67 Million | $4.51 Billion | ▲ +6.4 pp |
| 2011 | 47.3% | $1.63 Billion | $859.62 Million | $4.47 Billion | ▼ -43.4 pp |
| 2010 | 90.7% | $860.69 Million | $79.84 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2009 | 86.1% | $779.65 Million | $108.35 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2008 | 88.7% | $692.73 Million | $78.49 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2007 | 88.9% | $627.36 Million | $69.92 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 2006 | 91.2% | $563.70 Million | $49.42 Million | $974.78 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2005 | 89.3% | $526.66 Million | $56.23 Million | $937.72 Million | ▲ +46.6 pp |
| 2004 | 42.7% | $515.12 Million | $295.13 Million | $935.85 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2003 | 41.1% | $494.99 Million | $291.52 Million | $864.17 Million | ▼ -51.2 pp |
| 2002 | 92.3% | $453.50 Million | $34.95 Million | $772.97 Million | ▲ +12.8 pp |
| 2001 | 79.5% | $389.89 Million | $79.83 Million | $731.37 Million | ▲ +49.3 pp |
| 2000 | 30.3% | $244.37 Million | $170.43 Million | $506.93 Million | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 1999 | 34.1% | $214.80 Million | $141.50 Million | $428.90 Million | ▼ -25.7 pp |
| 1998 | 59.9% | $182.90 Million | $73.40 Million | $301.40 Million | ▼ -12.1 pp |
| 1997 | 72.0% | $91.40 Million | $25.60 Million | $171.30 Million | ▲ +67.5 pp |
| 1996 | 4.5% | $17.80 Million | $17.00 Million | $161.40 Million | ▼ -81.8 pp |
| 1995 | 86.3% | $8.00 Million | $1.10 Million | $111.40 Million | — |