Under Armour Inc A (UAA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Under Armour Inc A (UAA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $278.06 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.19 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Under Armour Inc A to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Under Armour Inc A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Under Armour Inc A across 45 annual periods. Also explore Under Armour Inc A annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Under Armour Inc A (2002–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Under Armour Inc A. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Under Armour Inc A market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-59.32 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▼ -118.1% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $353.97 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $353.97 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +4018.2% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $-9.91 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▲ +0.1% |
| 2022 | 0.00x | $-9.91 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▼ -101.4% |
| 2022 | 0.24x | $664.83 Million | $2.72 Billion | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $664.83 Million | $2.90 Billion | ▲ +238.3% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $212.86 Million | $3.14 Billion | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $212.86 Million | $3.35 Billion | ▼ -66.4% |
| 2020 | 0.19x | $509.03 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $509.03 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | $628.23 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.28x | $628.23 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +139.4% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $234.06 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $234.06 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▼ -37.3% |
| 2017 | 0.19x | $304.49 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | $304.49 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +611.0% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | $-44.10 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2015 | -0.04x | $-44.10 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▼ -112.5% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $219.03 Million | $744.78 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.29x | $219.03 Million | $744.78 Million | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | $120.07 Million | $524.39 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $120.07 Million | $524.39 Million | ▼ -61.0% |
| 2013 | 0.59x | $199.76 Million | $340.16 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.59x | $199.76 Million | $340.16 Million | ▲ +991.2% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $15.22 Million | $282.78 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $15.22 Million | $282.78 Million | ▼ -80.8% |
| 2011 | 0.28x | $50.11 Million | $178.41 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.28x | $50.11 Million | $178.41 Million | ▼ -65.6% |
| 2010 | 0.82x | $119.04 Million | $145.59 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.82x | $119.04 Million | $145.59 Million | ▲ +84.0% |
| 2009 | 0.44x | $69.52 Million | $156.46 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.44x | $69.52 Million | $156.46 Million | ▲ +434.5% |
| 2008 | -0.13x | $-14.63 Million | $110.13 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2007 | -0.13x | $-14.63 Million | $110.13 Million | ▼ -193.1% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $10.70 Million | $74.98 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.14x | $10.70 Million | $74.98 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 2006 | 0.30x | $15.79 Million | $52.86 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.30x | $15.79 Million | $52.86 Million | ▲ +403.0% |
| 2005 | -0.10x | $-8.85 Million | $89.74 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | -0.10x | $-8.85 Million | $89.74 Million | ▲ +56.4% |
| 2004 | -0.23x | $-9.70 Million | $42.86 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | -0.23x | $-9.70 Million | $42.86 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2003 | -0.28x | $-7.60 Million | $26.70 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2002 | -0.28x | $-7.60 Million | $26.70 Million | — |