Under Armour Inc A Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Under Armour Inc A working capital to net assets ratio. Under Armour Inc A (UAA) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 62.7% as of December 2025. Working capital of $899.56 Million (current assets of $2.99 Billion minus current liabilities of $2.09 Billion) is measured against net assets of $1.44 Billion. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check UAA tangible net assets ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Under Armour Inc A (2003–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Under Armour Inc A from 2003 to 2025. This chart shows how Under Armour Inc A's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 43 annual periods from 2003 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 62.7%, reflecting working capital of $899.56 Million against net assets of $1.44 Billion USD. See Under Armour Inc A defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Under Armour Inc A Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (2003–2025)
Under Armour Inc A working capital to net assets ratio by year from 2003 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Under Armour Inc A from 2003 to 2025, covering 43 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see UAA total asset value.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 64.5% | $1.22 Billion | $1.89 Billion | $2.33 Billion | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 2024 | 78.9% | $1.70 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.86 Billion | $1.17 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 78.9% | $1.70 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.86 Billion | $1.17 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2023 | 80.8% | $1.59 Billion | $1.97 Billion | $2.95 Billion | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2022 | 80.2% | $1.60 Billion | $2.00 Billion | $2.96 Billion | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2022 | 88.7% | $1.53 Billion | $1.73 Billion | $2.83 Billion | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2021 | 90.3% | $1.89 Billion | $2.09 Billion | $3.34 Billion | $1.45 Billion | ▼ -18.4 pp |
| 2021 | 108.7% | $1.92 Billion | $1.77 Billion | $3.16 Billion | $1.23 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2020 | 108.0% | $1.81 Billion | $1.68 Billion | $3.22 Billion | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +48.4 pp |
| 2020 | 59.5% | $1.28 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.70 Billion | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 59.5% | $1.28 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.70 Billion | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2019 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.59 Billion | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.59 Billion | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.34 Billion | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.34 Billion | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2017 | 63.1% | $1.28 Billion | $2.03 Billion | $1.98 Billion | $694.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 63.1% | $1.28 Billion | $2.03 Billion | $1.98 Billion | $694.70 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2016 | 61.1% | $1.02 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $478.81 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 61.1% | $1.02 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $478.81 Million | ▼ -22.4 pp |
| 2015 | 83.5% | $1.13 Billion | $1.35 Billion | $1.55 Billion | $421.63 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 83.5% | $1.13 Billion | $1.35 Billion | $1.55 Billion | $421.63 Million | ▲ +16.9 pp |
| 2014 | 66.7% | $702.18 Million | $1.05 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $426.63 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 66.7% | $702.18 Million | $1.05 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $426.63 Million | ▼ -13.1 pp |
| 2013 | 79.7% | $651.37 Million | $816.92 Million | $903.60 Million | $252.23 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 79.7% | $651.37 Million | $816.92 Million | $903.60 Million | $252.23 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2012 | 79.5% | $506.06 Million | $636.43 Million | $689.66 Million | $183.61 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 79.5% | $506.06 Million | $636.43 Million | $689.66 Million | $183.61 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2011 | 81.8% | $406.70 Million | $496.97 Million | $555.85 Million | $149.15 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 81.8% | $406.70 Million | $496.97 Million | $555.85 Million | $149.15 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2010 | 82.0% | $327.84 Million | $400.00 Million | $448.00 Million | $120.16 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 82.0% | $327.84 Million | $400.00 Million | $448.00 Million | $120.16 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2009 | 79.5% | $263.31 Million | $331.10 Million | $396.42 Million | $133.11 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 79.5% | $263.31 Million | $331.10 Million | $396.42 Million | $133.11 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2008 | 80.8% | $226.55 Million | $280.49 Million | $322.25 Million | $95.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 80.8% | $226.55 Million | $280.49 Million | $322.25 Million | $95.70 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 80.9% | $173.39 Million | $214.39 Million | $244.95 Million | $71.56 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 80.9% | $173.39 Million | $214.39 Million | $244.95 Million | $71.56 Million | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2006 | 88.9% | $134.12 Million | $150.83 Million | $181.79 Million | $47.67 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 88.9% | $134.12 Million | $150.83 Million | $181.79 Million | $47.67 Million | ▲ +10.3 pp |
| 2005 | 78.6% | $16.69 Million | $21.24 Million | $96.46 Million | $79.77 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 78.6% | $16.69 Million | $21.24 Million | $96.46 Million | $79.77 Million | ▼ -37.9 pp |
| 2004 | 116.5% | $13.82 Million | $11.87 Million | $50.38 Million | $36.56 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 116.5% | $13.82 Million | $11.87 Million | $50.38 Million | $36.56 Million | — |