Under Armour Inc A (UAA) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Under Armour Inc A (UAA) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 62.7% as of December 2025. Working capital of $899.56 Million (current assets of $2.99 Billion minus current liabilities of $2.09 Billion) is measured against net assets of $1.44 Billion. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See operational self-sufficiency of Under Armour Inc A to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Under Armour Inc A Working Capital to Net Assets (2003–2025)
This chart shows how Under Armour Inc A's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 43 annual periods from 2003 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 62.7%, reflecting working capital of $899.56 Million against net assets of $1.44 Billion USD. For the complete balance sheet picture, see Under Armour Inc A (UAA) total assets.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Under Armour Inc A (2003–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Under Armour Inc A from 2003 to 2025, covering 43 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check financial resilience of Under Armour Inc A to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 64.5% | $1.22 Billion | $1.89 Billion | $2.33 Billion | $1.11 Billion | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 2024 | 78.9% | $1.70 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.86 Billion | $1.17 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 78.9% | $1.70 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.86 Billion | $1.17 Billion | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2023 | 80.8% | $1.59 Billion | $1.97 Billion | $2.95 Billion | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2022 | 80.2% | $1.60 Billion | $2.00 Billion | $2.96 Billion | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -8.5 pp |
| 2022 | 88.7% | $1.53 Billion | $1.73 Billion | $2.83 Billion | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2021 | 90.3% | $1.89 Billion | $2.09 Billion | $3.34 Billion | $1.45 Billion | ▼ -18.4 pp |
| 2021 | 108.7% | $1.92 Billion | $1.77 Billion | $3.16 Billion | $1.23 Billion | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2020 | 108.0% | $1.81 Billion | $1.68 Billion | $3.22 Billion | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +48.4 pp |
| 2020 | 59.5% | $1.28 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.70 Billion | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 59.5% | $1.28 Billion | $2.15 Billion | $2.70 Billion | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2019 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.59 Billion | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.59 Billion | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2018 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.34 Billion | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 63.3% | $1.28 Billion | $2.02 Billion | $2.34 Billion | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2017 | 63.1% | $1.28 Billion | $2.03 Billion | $1.98 Billion | $694.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 63.1% | $1.28 Billion | $2.03 Billion | $1.98 Billion | $694.70 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2016 | 61.1% | $1.02 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $478.81 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 61.1% | $1.02 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $1.50 Billion | $478.81 Million | ▼ -22.4 pp |
| 2015 | 83.5% | $1.13 Billion | $1.35 Billion | $1.55 Billion | $421.63 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 83.5% | $1.13 Billion | $1.35 Billion | $1.55 Billion | $421.63 Million | ▲ +16.9 pp |
| 2014 | 66.7% | $702.18 Million | $1.05 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $426.63 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 66.7% | $702.18 Million | $1.05 Billion | $1.13 Billion | $426.63 Million | ▼ -13.1 pp |
| 2013 | 79.7% | $651.37 Million | $816.92 Million | $903.60 Million | $252.23 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 79.7% | $651.37 Million | $816.92 Million | $903.60 Million | $252.23 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2012 | 79.5% | $506.06 Million | $636.43 Million | $689.66 Million | $183.61 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 79.5% | $506.06 Million | $636.43 Million | $689.66 Million | $183.61 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2011 | 81.8% | $406.70 Million | $496.97 Million | $555.85 Million | $149.15 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 81.8% | $406.70 Million | $496.97 Million | $555.85 Million | $149.15 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2010 | 82.0% | $327.84 Million | $400.00 Million | $448.00 Million | $120.16 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 82.0% | $327.84 Million | $400.00 Million | $448.00 Million | $120.16 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2009 | 79.5% | $263.31 Million | $331.10 Million | $396.42 Million | $133.11 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 79.5% | $263.31 Million | $331.10 Million | $396.42 Million | $133.11 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2008 | 80.8% | $226.55 Million | $280.49 Million | $322.25 Million | $95.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 80.8% | $226.55 Million | $280.49 Million | $322.25 Million | $95.70 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2007 | 80.9% | $173.39 Million | $214.39 Million | $244.95 Million | $71.56 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 80.9% | $173.39 Million | $214.39 Million | $244.95 Million | $71.56 Million | ▼ -8.0 pp |
| 2006 | 88.9% | $134.12 Million | $150.83 Million | $181.79 Million | $47.67 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 88.9% | $134.12 Million | $150.83 Million | $181.79 Million | $47.67 Million | ▲ +10.3 pp |
| 2005 | 78.6% | $16.69 Million | $21.24 Million | $96.46 Million | $79.77 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 78.6% | $16.69 Million | $21.24 Million | $96.46 Million | $79.77 Million | ▼ -37.9 pp |
| 2004 | 116.5% | $13.82 Million | $11.87 Million | $50.38 Million | $36.56 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 116.5% | $13.82 Million | $11.87 Million | $50.38 Million | $36.56 Million | — |