Ultrapar Participacoes SA ADR (UGP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ultrapar Participacoes SA ADR (UGP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $525.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.54 Billion) in one year. See UGP financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Ultrapar Participacoes SA ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Ultrapar Participacoes SA ADR across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see UGP cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ultrapar Participacoes SA ADR (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ultrapar Participacoes SA ADR. Check Ultrapar Participacoes SA ADR (UGP) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $3.48 Billion | $32.54 Billion | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $3.74 Billion | $23.73 Billion | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $3.85 Billion | $24.22 Billion | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $2.00 Billion | $24.75 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $2.59 Billion | $28.85 Billion | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $3.14 Billion | $26.98 Billion | ▼ -78.5% |
| 2019 | 0.54x | $2.92 Billion | $5.41 Billion | ▲ +287.0% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $2.89 Billion | $20.70 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $2.28 Billion | $18.62 Billion | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2016 | 0.16x | $2.51 Billion | $15.60 Billion | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2015 | 0.25x | $3.20 Billion | $12.99 Billion | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | $2.65 Billion | $11.75 Billion | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | $2.12 Billion | $9.83 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2012 | 0.26x | $2.45 Billion | $9.28 Billion | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $1.71 Billion | $8.17 Billion | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2010 | 0.19x | $1.51 Billion | $7.81 Billion | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2009 | 0.26x | $2.87 Billion | $10.86 Billion | ▲ +252.5% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $373.50 Million | $4.98 Billion | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $468.16 Million | $4.67 Billion | ▼ -49.5% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $383.37 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $409.74 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2004 | 0.52x | $539.74 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +70.0% |
| 2003 | 0.31x | $310.14 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2002 | 0.52x | $468.80 Million | $905.80 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2001 | 0.48x | $339.06 Million | $712.95 Million | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | $237.89 Million | $713.66 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 1999 | 0.42x | $302.70 Million | $720.01 Million | — |