Bombardier Inc (BBD-A) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Bombardier Inc (BBD-A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.43 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$14.45 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Bombardier Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Bombardier Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Bombardier Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore Bombardier Inc (BBD-A) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Bombardier Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Bombardier Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Bombardier Inc (BBD-A) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | CA$1.23 Billion | CA$14.45 Billion | ▲ +222.0% |
| 2024 | 0.03x | CA$385.55 Million | CA$14.65 Billion | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | CA$633.10 Million | CA$14.76 Billion | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | CA$1.04 Billion | CA$15.23 Billion | ▲ +477.3% |
| 2021 | -0.02x | CA$-284.15 Million | CA$15.70 Billion | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2020 | -0.10x | CA$-2.96 Billion | CA$29.69 Billion | ▼ -343.1% |
| 2019 | -0.02x | CA$-677.67 Million | CA$30.08 Billion | ▼ -215.2% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | CA$568.25 Million | CA$29.06 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | CA$541.91 Million | CA$29.17 Billion | ▲ +261.2% |
| 2016 | 0.01x | CA$134.26 Million | CA$26.10 Billion | ▲ +652.7% |
| 2015 | 0.00x | CA$18.47 Million | CA$27.03 Billion | ▼ -97.7% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | CA$846.28 Million | CA$28.88 Billion | ▼ -41.1% |
| 2013 | 0.05x | CA$1.41 Billion | CA$28.37 Billion | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2012 | 0.06x | CA$1.44 Billion | CA$23.86 Billion | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | CA$1.68 Billion | CA$19.08 Billion | ▲ +163.9% |
| 2009 | 0.03x | CA$582.77 Million | CA$17.49 Billion | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | CA$803.04 Million | CA$18.94 Billion | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2007 | 0.15x | CA$2.48 Billion | CA$16.64 Billion | ▲ +157.6% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | CA$914.95 Million | CA$15.81 Billion | ▲ +5.4% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | CA$790.34 Million | CA$14.39 Billion | ▲ +95.4% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | CA$502.66 Million | CA$17.89 Billion | ▲ +177.4% |
| 2003 | -0.04x | CA$-611.25 Million | CA$16.84 Billion | ▼ -148.2% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | CA$1.30 Billion | CA$17.26 Billion | ▲ +358.6% |
| 2001 | -0.03x | CA$-434.48 Million | CA$14.92 Billion | ▼ -153.7% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | CA$600.95 Million | CA$11.08 Billion | ▼ -17.3% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | CA$607.33 Million | CA$9.26 Billion | ▼ -65.4% |
| 1998 | 0.19x | CA$1.35 Billion | CA$7.14 Billion | ▲ +249.6% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | CA$286.80 Million | CA$5.29 Billion | ▼ -21.5% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | CA$294.26 Million | CA$4.26 Billion | — |