Bombardier Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Bombardier Inc tangible net worth ratio. Bombardier Inc (BBD-A) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -412.4% as of June 2015. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$7.48 Billion) from net assets (CA$1.46 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check BBD-A PP&E to net assets ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Bombardier Inc (1996–2014)
Tangible net worth ratio of Bombardier Inc from 1996 to 2014. This chart shows how Bombardier Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 19 annual periods from 1996 to 2014. As of June 2015, the ratio stands at -412.4%, reflecting net assets of CA$1.46 Billion with intangible assets of CA$7.48 Billion CAD. See Bombardier Inc (BBD-A) working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Bombardier Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1996–2014)
Bombardier Inc tangible net worth ratio by year from 1996 to 2014. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Bombardier Inc from 1996 to 2014, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see BBD-A stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | -12589.1% | CA$57.63 Million | CA$7.31 Billion | CA$28.93 Billion | ▼ -12411.7 pp |
| 2013 | -177.3% | CA$2.58 Billion | CA$7.16 Billion | CA$30.95 Billion | ▲ +118.8 pp |
| 2012 | -296.2% | CA$1.25 Billion | CA$4.97 Billion | CA$25.11 Billion | ▲ +109.8 pp |
| 2011 | -406.0% | CA$672.03 Million | CA$3.40 Billion | CA$23.90 Billion | ▼ -453.0 pp |
| 2010 | 47.1% | CA$4.35 Billion | CA$2.30 Billion | CA$23.43 Billion | ▼ -7.9 pp |
| 2009 | 55.0% | CA$3.77 Billion | CA$1.69 Billion | CA$21.25 Billion | ▲ +10.0 pp |
| 2008 | 45.0% | CA$2.57 Billion | CA$1.41 Billion | CA$21.51 Billion | ▼ -49.6 pp |
| 2007 | 94.6% | CA$3.22 Billion | CA$174.04 Million | CA$19.86 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2006 | 94.8% | CA$2.73 Billion | CA$140.69 Million | CA$18.54 Billion | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2005 | 93.9% | CA$2.42 Billion | CA$147.87 Million | CA$16.81 Billion | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2004 | 91.5% | CA$2.30 Billion | CA$195.58 Million | CA$20.19 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2003 | 91.6% | CA$2.45 Billion | CA$206.77 Million | CA$19.30 Billion | ▼ -8.4 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$1.80 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$19.06 Billion | ▲ +202.9 pp |
| 2001 | -102.9% | CA$2.58 Billion | CA$5.23 Billion | CA$17.50 Billion | ▼ -202.9 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$2.55 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$13.63 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$2.49 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$11.75 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$2.31 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$9.45 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | CA$1.99 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$7.28 Billion | ▲ +98.1 pp |
| 1996 | 1.9% | CA$1.64 Billion | CA$1.61 Billion | CA$5.90 Billion | — |