Bombardier Inc (BBD-A) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Bombardier Inc (BBD-A) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of -412.4% as of June 2015. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$7.48 Billion) from net assets (CA$1.46 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See BBD-A net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Bombardier Inc Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1996–2014)
This chart shows how Bombardier Inc's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 19 annual periods from 1996 to 2014. As of June 2015, the ratio stands at -412.4%, reflecting net assets of CA$1.46 Billion with intangible assets of CA$7.48 Billion CAD. See defensive interval ratio of Bombardier Inc to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Bombardier Inc (1996–2014)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Bombardier Inc from 1996 to 2014, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see how much is Bombardier Inc worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | -12589.1% | CA$57.63 Million | CA$7.31 Billion | CA$28.93 Billion | ▼ -12411.7 pp |
| 2013 | -177.3% | CA$2.58 Billion | CA$7.16 Billion | CA$30.95 Billion | ▲ +118.8 pp |
| 2012 | -296.2% | CA$1.25 Billion | CA$4.97 Billion | CA$25.11 Billion | ▲ +109.8 pp |
| 2011 | -406.0% | CA$672.03 Million | CA$3.40 Billion | CA$23.90 Billion | ▼ -453.0 pp |
| 2010 | 47.1% | CA$4.35 Billion | CA$2.30 Billion | CA$23.43 Billion | ▼ -7.9 pp |
| 2009 | 55.0% | CA$3.77 Billion | CA$1.69 Billion | CA$21.25 Billion | ▲ +10.0 pp |
| 2008 | 45.0% | CA$2.57 Billion | CA$1.41 Billion | CA$21.51 Billion | ▼ -49.6 pp |
| 2007 | 94.6% | CA$3.22 Billion | CA$174.04 Million | CA$19.86 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2006 | 94.8% | CA$2.73 Billion | CA$140.69 Million | CA$18.54 Billion | ▲ +0.9 pp |
| 2005 | 93.9% | CA$2.42 Billion | CA$147.87 Million | CA$16.81 Billion | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2004 | 91.5% | CA$2.30 Billion | CA$195.58 Million | CA$20.19 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2003 | 91.6% | CA$2.45 Billion | CA$206.77 Million | CA$19.30 Billion | ▼ -8.4 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$1.80 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$19.06 Billion | ▲ +202.9 pp |
| 2001 | -102.9% | CA$2.58 Billion | CA$5.23 Billion | CA$17.50 Billion | ▼ -202.9 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$2.55 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$13.63 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$2.49 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$11.75 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$2.31 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$9.45 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | CA$1.99 Billion | CA$0.00 | CA$7.28 Billion | ▲ +98.1 pp |
| 1996 | 1.9% | CA$1.64 Billion | CA$1.61 Billion | CA$5.90 Billion | — |