Canasil Resources Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canasil Resources Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Canasil Resources Inc. (CLZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.51x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-239.21K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$465.15K) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Canasil Resources Inc. to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Canasil Resources Inc. (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Canasil Resources Inc. from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Canasil Resources Inc. across 28 annual periods. Check Canasil Resources Inc. cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Canasil Resources Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Canasil Resources Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canasil Resources Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Canasil Resources Inc. generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | CA$26.99K | CA$666.39K | ▲ +274.2% |
| 2024 | -0.02x | CA$-14.73K | CA$633.31K | ▲ +95.6% |
| 2023 | -0.53x | CA$-279.63K | CA$525.98K | ▲ +78.9% |
| 2022 | -2.52x | CA$-704.05K | CA$279.45K | ▲ +88.5% |
| 2021 | -21.92x | CA$-2.01 Million | CA$91.74K | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2020 | -13.44x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$130.67K | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2019 | -8.91x | CA$-1.32 Million | CA$148.21K | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2018 | -10.93x | CA$-1.39 Million | CA$127.05K | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2017 | -18.70x | CA$-2.05 Million | CA$109.58K | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2016 | -11.37x | CA$-1.56 Million | CA$137.60K | ▼ -887.7% |
| 2015 | -1.15x | CA$-942.63K | CA$818.64K | ▲ +83.7% |
| 2014 | -7.06x | CA$-3.57 Million | CA$505.91K | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2013 | -7.93x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$163.76K | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2012 | -6.91x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$167.53K | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2011 | -16.02x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$136.18K | ▼ -97.8% |
| 2010 | -8.10x | CA$-693.71K | CA$85.68K | ▼ -17628.2% |
| 2009 | -0.05x | CA$-18.50K | CA$404.98K | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2008 | -1.69x | CA$-490.40K | CA$290.88K | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2007 | -4.01x | CA$-557.39K | CA$139.16K | ▼ -128.3% |
| 2006 | -1.75x | CA$-337.56K | CA$192.43K | ▲ +74.9% |
| 2005 | -7.00x | CA$-314.34K | CA$44.92K | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2004 | -11.72x | CA$-257.13K | CA$21.95K | ▼ -1977.3% |
| 2003 | -0.56x | CA$-55.80K | CA$98.95K | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2002 | -4.38x | CA$-119.03K | CA$27.15K | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2001 | -2.53x | CA$-50.41K | CA$19.95K | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2000 | -4.55x | CA$-172.29K | CA$37.86K | ▼ -54.1% |
| 1999 | -2.95x | CA$-276.59K | CA$93.68K | ▲ +61.7% |
| 1998 | -7.71x | CA$-51.04K | CA$6.62K | — |