Canasil Resources Inc. (CLZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canasil Resources Inc. (CLZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.13x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-70.33K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$522.09K) in one year. See Canasil Resources Inc. (CLZ) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Canasil Resources Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Canasil Resources Inc. across 27 annual periods. Also explore CLZ year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Canasil Resources Inc. (1998–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canasil Resources Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Canasil Resources Inc. market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.02x | CA$-14.73K | CA$633.31K | ▲ +95.6% |
| 2023 | -0.53x | CA$-279.63K | CA$525.98K | ▲ +78.9% |
| 2022 | -2.52x | CA$-704.05K | CA$279.45K | ▲ +88.5% |
| 2021 | -21.92x | CA$-2.01 Million | CA$91.74K | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2020 | -13.44x | CA$-1.76 Million | CA$130.67K | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2019 | -8.91x | CA$-1.32 Million | CA$148.21K | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2018 | -10.93x | CA$-1.39 Million | CA$127.05K | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2017 | -18.70x | CA$-2.05 Million | CA$109.58K | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2016 | -11.37x | CA$-1.56 Million | CA$137.60K | ▼ -887.7% |
| 2015 | -1.15x | CA$-942.63K | CA$818.64K | ▲ +83.7% |
| 2014 | -7.06x | CA$-3.57 Million | CA$505.91K | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2013 | -7.93x | CA$-1.30 Million | CA$163.76K | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2012 | -6.91x | CA$-1.16 Million | CA$167.53K | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2011 | -16.02x | CA$-2.18 Million | CA$136.18K | ▼ -97.8% |
| 2010 | -8.10x | CA$-693.71K | CA$85.68K | ▼ -17628.2% |
| 2009 | -0.05x | CA$-18.50K | CA$404.98K | ▲ +97.3% |
| 2008 | -1.69x | CA$-490.40K | CA$290.88K | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2007 | -4.01x | CA$-557.39K | CA$139.16K | ▼ -128.3% |
| 2006 | -1.75x | CA$-337.56K | CA$192.43K | ▲ +74.9% |
| 2005 | -7.00x | CA$-314.34K | CA$44.92K | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2004 | -11.72x | CA$-257.13K | CA$21.95K | ▼ -1977.3% |
| 2003 | -0.56x | CA$-55.80K | CA$98.95K | ▲ +87.1% |
| 2002 | -4.38x | CA$-119.03K | CA$27.15K | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2001 | -2.53x | CA$-50.41K | CA$19.95K | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2000 | -4.55x | CA$-172.29K | CA$37.86K | ▼ -54.1% |
| 1999 | -2.95x | CA$-276.59K | CA$93.68K | ▲ +61.7% |
| 1998 | -7.71x | CA$-51.04K | CA$6.62K | — |