Canasil Resources Inc. (CLZ) — Net Asset Quality Index
Canasil Resources Inc. (CLZ) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -334.7% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$120.11K minus total liabilities of CA$522.09K yields net assets of CA$-401.98K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Canasil Resources Inc. liquid asset ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Canasil Resources Inc. Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1998–2024)
This chart shows how Canasil Resources Inc.'s Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 27 annual periods from 1998 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at -334.7%, representing net assets of CA$-401.98K against total assets of CA$120.11K CAD. See Canasil Resources Inc. (CLZ) liquidity to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Canasil Resources Inc. (1998–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Canasil Resources Inc. from 1998 to 2024, covering 27 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see market value of Canasil Resources Inc..
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -935.8% | CA$-572.16K | CA$61.15K | CA$633.31K | ▼ -285.8 pp |
| 2023 | -650.0% | CA$-455.85K | CA$70.13K | CA$525.98K | ▼ -610.2 pp |
| 2022 | -39.8% | CA$-79.56K | CA$199.89K | CA$279.45K | ▼ -124.6 pp |
| 2021 | 84.8% | CA$512.44K | CA$604.18K | CA$91.74K | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2020 | 89.1% | CA$1.07 Million | CA$1.20 Million | CA$130.67K | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2019 | 85.5% | CA$873.58K | CA$1.02 Million | CA$148.21K | ▲ +23.8 pp |
| 2018 | 61.7% | CA$204.78K | CA$331.83K | CA$127.05K | ▼ -30.6 pp |
| 2017 | 92.4% | CA$1.32 Million | CA$1.43 Million | CA$109.58K | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2016 | 96.6% | CA$3.92 Million | CA$4.06 Million | CA$137.60K | ▲ +96.1 pp |
| 2015 | 0.5% | CA$3.92K | CA$822.56K | CA$818.64K | ▼ -24.2 pp |
| 2014 | 24.7% | CA$165.73K | CA$671.64K | CA$505.91K | ▼ -39.0 pp |
| 2013 | 63.7% | CA$287.67K | CA$451.43K | CA$163.76K | ▼ -21.1 pp |
| 2012 | 84.8% | CA$936.67K | CA$1.10 Million | CA$167.53K | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2011 | 83.4% | CA$686.02K | CA$822.20K | CA$136.18K | ▼ -15.4 pp |
| 2010 | 98.8% | CA$7.31 Million | CA$7.40 Million | CA$85.68K | ▲ +6.4 pp |
| 2009 | 92.5% | CA$4.98 Million | CA$5.39 Million | CA$404.98K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2008 | 94.5% | CA$5.02 Million | CA$5.31 Million | CA$290.88K | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2007 | 97.5% | CA$5.46 Million | CA$5.60 Million | CA$139.16K | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 2006 | 93.8% | CA$2.91 Million | CA$3.10 Million | CA$192.43K | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 2005 | 97.9% | CA$2.07 Million | CA$2.12 Million | CA$44.92K | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2004 | 99.1% | CA$2.36 Million | CA$2.38 Million | CA$21.95K | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2003 | 96.2% | CA$2.51 Million | CA$2.61 Million | CA$98.95K | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2002 | 98.1% | CA$1.44 Million | CA$1.47 Million | CA$27.15K | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2001 | 98.7% | CA$1.52 Million | CA$1.54 Million | CA$19.95K | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2000 | 98.2% | CA$2.03 Million | CA$2.07 Million | CA$37.86K | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 1999 | 95.8% | CA$2.15 Million | CA$2.25 Million | CA$93.68K | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 1998 | 99.6% | CA$1.77 Million | CA$1.77 Million | CA$6.62K | — |