Canasil Resources Inc. (CLZ) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Canasil Resources Inc. (CLZ) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of June 2022. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$0.00) from net assets (CA$49.21K) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See working capital to net assets of Canasil Resources Inc. to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Canasil Resources Inc. Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1998–2021)
This chart shows how Canasil Resources Inc.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 24 annual periods from 1998 to 2021. As of June 2022, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of CA$49.21K with intangible assets of CA$0.00 CAD. See Canasil Resources Inc. (CLZ) defensive interval to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Canasil Resources Inc. (1998–2021)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Canasil Resources Inc. from 1998 to 2021, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see CLZ company net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 100.0% | CA$512.44K | CA$0.00 | CA$604.18K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | CA$1.07 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | CA$873.58K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.02 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | CA$204.78K | CA$0.00 | CA$331.83K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | CA$1.32 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.43 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$3.92 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.06 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$3.92K | CA$0.00 | CA$822.56K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$165.73K | CA$0.00 | CA$671.64K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$287.67K | CA$0.00 | CA$451.43K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$936.67K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.10 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$686.02K | CA$0.00 | CA$822.20K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$7.31 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$7.40 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$4.98 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.39 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$5.02 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.31 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$5.46 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.60 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$2.91 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$3.10 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$2.07 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.12 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$2.36 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.38 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$2.51 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.61 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$1.44 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.47 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$1.52 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.54 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$2.03 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.07 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$2.15 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.25 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$1.77 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.77 Million | — |