Canasil Resources Inc. Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Canasil Resources Inc. tangible net worth ratio. Canasil Resources Inc. (CLZ) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$0.00) from net assets (CA$3.27K) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check CLZ PP&E to net assets ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Canasil Resources Inc. (1998–2021)
Tangible net worth ratio of Canasil Resources Inc. from 1998 to 2021. This chart shows how Canasil Resources Inc.'s Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 24 annual periods from 1998 to 2021. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of CA$3.27K with intangible assets of CA$0.00 CAD. See CLZ net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Canasil Resources Inc. Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1998–2021)
Canasil Resources Inc. tangible net worth ratio by year from 1998 to 2021. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Canasil Resources Inc. from 1998 to 2021, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Canasil Resources Inc. (CLZ) total market value.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 100.0% | CA$512.44K | CA$0.00 | CA$604.18K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | CA$1.07 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | CA$873.58K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.02 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | CA$204.78K | CA$0.00 | CA$331.83K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | CA$1.32 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.43 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$3.92 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.06 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$3.92K | CA$0.00 | CA$822.56K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$165.73K | CA$0.00 | CA$671.64K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$287.67K | CA$0.00 | CA$451.43K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$936.67K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.10 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$686.02K | CA$0.00 | CA$822.20K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$7.31 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$7.40 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$4.98 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.39 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$5.02 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.31 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$5.46 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.60 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$2.91 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$3.10 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$2.07 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.12 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$2.36 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.38 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$2.51 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.61 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$1.44 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.47 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$1.52 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.54 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | CA$2.03 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.07 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | CA$2.15 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$2.25 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$1.77 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.77 Million | — |