NamSys Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NamSys Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. NamSys Inc (CTZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.74x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.14 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.55 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of NamSys Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of NamSys Inc (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of NamSys Inc from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for NamSys Inc across 28 annual periods. Check CTZ cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
NamSys Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
NamSys Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NamSys Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CTZ cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.59x | CA$2.20 Million | CA$846.96K | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2024 | 2.58x | CA$2.51 Million | CA$972.83K | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2023 | 1.97x | CA$1.66 Million | CA$840.94K | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2022 | 1.46x | CA$962.02K | CA$659.41K | ▲ +173.3% |
| 2021 | -1.99x | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$810.27K | ▼ -593.1% |
| 2020 | 0.40x | CA$1.88 Million | CA$4.65 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2019 | 1.30x | CA$1.40 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2018 | 3.17x | CA$1.23 Million | CA$386.91K | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2017 | 2.19x | CA$1.10 Million | CA$503.25K | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2016 | 2.55x | CA$1.12 Million | CA$439.36K | ▲ +16.5% |
| 2015 | 2.19x | CA$578.65K | CA$263.89K | ▲ +569.6% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | CA$186.92K | CA$570.82K | ▲ +786.0% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | CA$70.70K | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +970.2% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | CA$6.59K | CA$1.91 Million | ▼ -74.0% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CA$25.47K | CA$1.92 Million | ▲ +126.0% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | CA$-100.86K | CA$1.97 Million | ▼ -53.6% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | CA$-71.36K | CA$2.14 Million | ▲ +63.0% |
| 2008 | -0.09x | CA$-207.81K | CA$2.30 Million | ▼ -2337.7% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | CA$9.34K | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +147.3% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | CA$-27.99K | CA$3.29 Million | ▼ -182.2% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | CA$29.43K | CA$2.84 Million | ▲ +110.4% |
| 2004 | -0.10x | CA$-345.52K | CA$3.47 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2003 | -0.31x | CA$-937.11K | CA$3.01 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2002 | -0.47x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$2.17 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2001 | -0.74x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$1.36 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 2000 | -1.56x | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$981.94K | ▼ -56.2% |
| 1999 | -1.00x | CA$-600.00K | CA$600.00K | ▼ -800.0% |
| 1998 | -0.11x | CA$-100.00K | CA$900.00K | — |