NamSys Inc (CTZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NamSys Inc (CTZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.74x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.14 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.55 Million) in one year. Check NamSys Inc (CTZ) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
NamSys Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for NamSys Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore NamSys Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for NamSys Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NamSys Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of NamSys Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.59x | CA$2.20 Million | CA$846.96K | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2024 | 2.58x | CA$2.51 Million | CA$972.83K | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2023 | 1.97x | CA$1.66 Million | CA$840.94K | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2022 | 1.46x | CA$962.02K | CA$659.41K | ▲ +173.3% |
| 2021 | -1.99x | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$810.27K | ▼ -593.1% |
| 2020 | 0.40x | CA$1.88 Million | CA$4.65 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2019 | 1.30x | CA$1.40 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2018 | 3.17x | CA$1.23 Million | CA$386.91K | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2017 | 2.19x | CA$1.10 Million | CA$503.25K | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2016 | 2.55x | CA$1.12 Million | CA$439.36K | ▲ +16.5% |
| 2015 | 2.19x | CA$578.65K | CA$263.89K | ▲ +569.6% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | CA$186.92K | CA$570.82K | ▲ +786.0% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | CA$70.70K | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +970.2% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | CA$6.59K | CA$1.91 Million | ▼ -74.0% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CA$25.47K | CA$1.92 Million | ▲ +126.0% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | CA$-100.86K | CA$1.97 Million | ▼ -53.6% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | CA$-71.36K | CA$2.14 Million | ▲ +63.0% |
| 2008 | -0.09x | CA$-207.81K | CA$2.30 Million | ▼ -2337.7% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | CA$9.34K | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +147.3% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | CA$-27.99K | CA$3.29 Million | ▼ -182.2% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | CA$29.43K | CA$2.84 Million | ▲ +110.4% |
| 2004 | -0.10x | CA$-345.52K | CA$3.47 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2003 | -0.31x | CA$-937.11K | CA$3.01 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2002 | -0.47x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$2.17 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2001 | -0.74x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$1.36 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 2000 | -1.56x | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$981.94K | ▼ -56.2% |
| 1999 | -1.00x | CA$-600.00K | CA$600.00K | ▼ -800.0% |
| 1998 | -0.11x | CA$-100.00K | CA$900.00K | — |