NamSys Inc (CTZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NamSys Inc (CTZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.74x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$1.14 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.55 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of NamSys Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
NamSys Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for NamSys Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore NamSys Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for NamSys Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NamSys Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see NamSys Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.59x | CA$2.20 Million | CA$846.96K | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2024 | 2.58x | CA$2.51 Million | CA$972.83K | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2023 | 1.97x | CA$1.66 Million | CA$840.94K | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2022 | 1.46x | CA$962.02K | CA$659.41K | ▲ +173.3% |
| 2021 | -1.99x | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$810.27K | ▼ -593.1% |
| 2020 | 0.40x | CA$1.88 Million | CA$4.65 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2019 | 1.30x | CA$1.40 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2018 | 3.17x | CA$1.23 Million | CA$386.91K | ▲ +45.0% |
| 2017 | 2.19x | CA$1.10 Million | CA$503.25K | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2016 | 2.55x | CA$1.12 Million | CA$439.36K | ▲ +16.5% |
| 2015 | 2.19x | CA$578.65K | CA$263.89K | ▲ +569.6% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | CA$186.92K | CA$570.82K | ▲ +786.0% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | CA$70.70K | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +970.2% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | CA$6.59K | CA$1.91 Million | ▼ -74.0% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CA$25.47K | CA$1.92 Million | ▲ +126.0% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | CA$-100.86K | CA$1.97 Million | ▼ -53.6% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | CA$-71.36K | CA$2.14 Million | ▲ +63.0% |
| 2008 | -0.09x | CA$-207.81K | CA$2.30 Million | ▼ -2337.7% |
| 2007 | 0.00x | CA$9.34K | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +147.3% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | CA$-27.99K | CA$3.29 Million | ▼ -182.2% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | CA$29.43K | CA$2.84 Million | ▲ +110.4% |
| 2004 | -0.10x | CA$-345.52K | CA$3.47 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2003 | -0.31x | CA$-937.11K | CA$3.01 Million | ▲ +33.0% |
| 2002 | -0.47x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$2.17 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 2001 | -0.74x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$1.36 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 2000 | -1.56x | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$981.94K | ▼ -56.2% |
| 1999 | -1.00x | CA$-600.00K | CA$600.00K | ▼ -800.0% |
| 1998 | -0.11x | CA$-100.00K | CA$900.00K | — |