NamSys Inc (CTZ) — Financial Flexibility Index
NamSys Inc (CTZ) has a Financial Flexibility Index of 0.74x as of January 2026. Free cash flow of CA$1.15 Million (operating CF CA$1.14 Million minus capex CA$2.02K) represents 1% of total liabilities (CA$1.55 Million). Check how aggressively does NamSys Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Financial Flexibility Index
Free Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Capital Expenditures
NamSys Inc Financial Flexibility Index (1998–2025)
Historical Financial Flexibility Index trend for NamSys Inc across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CTZ operating cash flow.
Annual Financial Flexibility Index for NamSys Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year free cash flow to debt coverage for NamSys Inc. Explore CTZ cash flow to debt ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
| Year | Flexibility Index | Free Cash Flow (CAD) | Operating CF | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.60x | CA$2.21 Million | CA$2.20 Million | CA$846.96K | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2024 | 2.59x | CA$2.52 Million | CA$2.51 Million | CA$972.83K | ▲ +30.7% |
| 2023 | 1.98x | CA$1.66 Million | CA$1.66 Million | CA$840.94K | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2022 | 1.47x | CA$971.33K | CA$962.02K | CA$659.41K | ▲ +174.6% |
| 2021 | -1.98x | CA$-1.60 Million | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$810.27K | ▼ -587.0% |
| 2020 | 0.41x | CA$1.89 Million | CA$1.88 Million | CA$4.65 Million | ▼ -69.1% |
| 2019 | 1.31x | CA$1.42 Million | CA$1.40 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -58.8% |
| 2018 | 3.19x | CA$1.23 Million | CA$1.23 Million | CA$386.91K | ▲ +44.2% |
| 2017 | 2.21x | CA$1.11 Million | CA$1.10 Million | CA$503.25K | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2016 | 2.56x | CA$1.13 Million | CA$1.12 Million | CA$439.36K | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2015 | 2.22x | CA$586.59K | CA$578.65K | CA$263.89K | ▲ +546.5% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | CA$196.25K | CA$186.92K | CA$570.82K | ▲ +800.9% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | CA$73.00K | CA$70.70K | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +106.0% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | CA$35.38K | CA$6.59K | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +34.6% |
| 2011 | 0.01x | CA$26.36K | CA$25.47K | CA$1.92 Million | ▲ +136.9% |
| 2010 | -0.04x | CA$-73.51K | CA$-100.86K | CA$1.97 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | CA$-66.43K | CA$-71.36K | CA$2.14 Million | ▲ +65.6% |
| 2008 | -0.09x | CA$-207.81K | CA$-207.81K | CA$2.30 Million | ▼ -955.1% |
| 2007 | 0.01x | CA$24.43K | CA$9.34K | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +293.4% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | CA$-17.91K | CA$-27.99K | CA$3.29 Million | ▼ -122.7% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | CA$68.10K | CA$29.43K | CA$2.84 Million | ▲ +125.3% |
| 2004 | -0.09x | CA$-329.22K | CA$-345.52K | CA$3.47 Million | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2003 | -0.27x | CA$-818.02K | CA$-937.11K | CA$3.01 Million | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2002 | -0.41x | CA$-895.53K | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$2.17 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2001 | -0.65x | CA$-888.80K | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$1.36 Million | ▲ +54.0% |
| 2000 | -1.42x | CA$-1.39 Million | CA$-1.53 Million | CA$981.94K | ▼ -183.4% |
| 1999 | -0.50x | CA$-300.00K | CA$-600.00K | CA$600.00K | ▼ -550.0% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | CA$100.00K | CA$-100.00K | CA$900.00K | — |