NamSys Inc Net Asset Quality Index
NamSys Inc net asset quality index. NamSys Inc (CTZ) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 87.9% as of January 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$12.82 Million minus total liabilities of CA$1.55 Million yields net assets of CA$11.26 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See NamSys Inc book value and equity for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of NamSys Inc (1998–2025)
Net asset quality index of NamSys Inc from 1998 to 2025. This chart shows how NamSys Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of January 2026, the index stands at 87.9%, representing net assets of CA$11.26 Million against total assets of CA$12.82 Million CAD. Check how strategically is NamSys Inc's equity deployed to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
NamSys Inc Net Asset Quality Index by Year (1998–2025)
NamSys Inc net asset quality index by year from 1998 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for NamSys Inc from 1998 to 2025, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is NamSys Inc worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 92.7% | CA$10.79 Million | CA$11.63 Million | CA$846.96K | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2024 | 89.5% | CA$8.26 Million | CA$9.24 Million | CA$972.83K | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2023 | 90.2% | CA$7.75 Million | CA$8.59 Million | CA$840.94K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 90.2% | CA$6.05 Million | CA$6.71 Million | CA$659.41K | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2021 | 85.2% | CA$4.65 Million | CA$5.46 Million | CA$810.27K | ▲ +43.0 pp |
| 2020 | 42.1% | CA$3.39 Million | CA$8.04 Million | CA$4.65 Million | ▼ -38.5 pp |
| 2019 | 80.6% | CA$4.48 Million | CA$5.55 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -8.6 pp |
| 2018 | 89.1% | CA$3.18 Million | CA$3.56 Million | CA$386.91K | ▲ +9.0 pp |
| 2017 | 80.1% | CA$2.03 Million | CA$2.53 Million | CA$503.25K | ▲ +8.6 pp |
| 2016 | 71.6% | CA$1.11 Million | CA$1.54 Million | CA$439.36K | ▼ -9.4 pp |
| 2015 | 81.0% | CA$1.12 Million | CA$1.39 Million | CA$263.89K | ▲ +36.3 pp |
| 2014 | 44.6% | CA$460.17K | CA$1.03 Million | CA$570.82K | ▲ +566.4 pp |
| 2013 | -521.8% | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$307.64K | CA$1.91 Million | ▲ +236.7 pp |
| 2012 | -758.5% | CA$-1.69 Million | CA$222.43K | CA$1.91 Million | ▼ -342.7 pp |
| 2011 | -415.8% | CA$-1.54 Million | CA$371.30K | CA$1.92 Million | ▼ -36.0 pp |
| 2010 | -379.8% | CA$-1.56 Million | CA$410.46K | CA$1.97 Million | ▼ -73.2 pp |
| 2009 | -306.6% | CA$-1.61 Million | CA$526.35K | CA$2.14 Million | ▼ -103.9 pp |
| 2008 | -202.7% | CA$-1.54 Million | CA$761.26K | CA$2.30 Million | ▼ -34.2 pp |
| 2007 | -168.6% | CA$-1.45 Million | CA$862.75K | CA$2.32 Million | ▲ +16.6 pp |
| 2006 | -185.1% | CA$-2.13 Million | CA$1.15 Million | CA$3.29 Million | ▲ +289.6 pp |
| 2005 | -474.7% | CA$-2.35 Million | CA$494.07K | CA$2.84 Million | ▼ -112.5 pp |
| 2004 | -362.2% | CA$-2.72 Million | CA$751.39K | CA$3.47 Million | ▼ -265.3 pp |
| 2003 | -96.9% | CA$-1.48 Million | CA$1.53 Million | CA$3.01 Million | ▼ -109.2 pp |
| 2002 | 12.3% | CA$303.06K | CA$2.47 Million | CA$2.17 Million | ▼ -29.2 pp |
| 2001 | 41.4% | CA$965.35K | CA$2.33 Million | CA$1.36 Million | ▼ -34.6 pp |
| 2000 | 76.0% | CA$3.11 Million | CA$4.10 Million | CA$981.94K | ▼ -11.5 pp |
| 1999 | 87.5% | CA$4.20 Million | CA$4.80 Million | CA$600.00K | ▲ +69.3 pp |
| 1998 | 18.2% | CA$200.00K | CA$1.10 Million | CA$900.00K | — |