Kermode Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kermode Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.08x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-20.88K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$255.54K) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Kermode Resources Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Kermode Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Kermode Resources Ltd from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Kermode Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. Check KLM total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Kermode Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Kermode Resources Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kermode Resources Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KLM cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | CA$74.56K | CA$367.25K | ▲ +303.4% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | CA$-34.64K | CA$347.12K | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | CA$-86.04K | CA$283.12K | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2022 | -0.81x | CA$-223.04K | CA$276.79K | ▼ -1344.5% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | CA$-25.80K | CA$462.42K | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2020 | -0.15x | CA$-73.62K | CA$482.23K | ▼ -101.4% |
| 2019 | -0.08x | CA$-24.45K | CA$322.56K | ▲ +93.8% |
| 2018 | -1.23x | CA$-310.39K | CA$252.97K | ▼ -1071.2% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | CA$-35.14K | CA$335.45K | ▼ -24946.1% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | CA$132.00 | CA$313.06K | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2015 | -0.68x | CA$-180.69K | CA$265.77K | ▼ -4294.5% |
| 2014 | -0.02x | CA$-4.92K | CA$317.95K | ▲ +98.3% |
| 2013 | -0.89x | CA$-250.24K | CA$281.39K | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2012 | -1.78x | CA$-311.26K | CA$175.03K | ▲ +54.0% |
| 2011 | -3.87x | CA$-191.69K | CA$49.58K | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2010 | -7.44x | CA$-314.18K | CA$42.25K | ▼ -150.7% |
| 2009 | -2.97x | CA$-148.46K | CA$50.05K | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2008 | -2.60x | CA$-149.32K | CA$57.36K | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2007 | -3.66x | CA$-754.62K | CA$206.45K | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2006 | -3.63x | CA$-358.31K | CA$98.69K | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2005 | -3.14x | CA$-359.81K | CA$114.41K | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2004 | -4.04x | CA$-411.66K | CA$102.00K | ▼ -144.8% |
| 2003 | -1.65x | CA$-245.69K | CA$149.05K | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2002 | -1.45x | CA$-111.02K | CA$76.65K | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2001 | -0.87x | CA$-113.67K | CA$130.95K | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2000 | -1.30x | CA$-186.97K | CA$144.15K | ▼ -343.7% |
| 1999 | 0.53x | CA$38.14K | CA$71.65K | ▲ +106.9% |
| 1998 | -7.70x | CA$-79.88K | CA$10.38K | — |