Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.08x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-20.88K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$255.54K) in one year. See KLM FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kermode Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kermode Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Kermode Resources Ltd operating cash flow efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kermode Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kermode Resources Ltd. Check Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | CA$74.56K | CA$367.25K | ▲ +303.4% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | CA$-34.64K | CA$347.12K | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | CA$-86.04K | CA$283.12K | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2022 | -0.81x | CA$-223.04K | CA$276.79K | ▼ -1344.5% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | CA$-25.80K | CA$462.42K | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2020 | -0.15x | CA$-73.62K | CA$482.23K | ▼ -101.4% |
| 2019 | -0.08x | CA$-24.45K | CA$322.56K | ▲ +93.8% |
| 2018 | -1.23x | CA$-310.39K | CA$252.97K | ▼ -1071.2% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | CA$-35.14K | CA$335.45K | ▼ -24946.1% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | CA$132.00 | CA$313.06K | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2015 | -0.68x | CA$-180.69K | CA$265.77K | ▼ -4294.5% |
| 2014 | -0.02x | CA$-4.92K | CA$317.95K | ▲ +98.3% |
| 2013 | -0.89x | CA$-250.24K | CA$281.39K | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2012 | -1.78x | CA$-311.26K | CA$175.03K | ▲ +54.0% |
| 2011 | -3.87x | CA$-191.69K | CA$49.58K | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2010 | -7.44x | CA$-314.18K | CA$42.25K | ▼ -150.7% |
| 2009 | -2.97x | CA$-148.46K | CA$50.05K | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2008 | -2.60x | CA$-149.32K | CA$57.36K | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2007 | -3.66x | CA$-754.62K | CA$206.45K | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2006 | -3.63x | CA$-358.31K | CA$98.69K | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2005 | -3.14x | CA$-359.81K | CA$114.41K | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2004 | -4.04x | CA$-411.66K | CA$102.00K | ▼ -144.8% |
| 2003 | -1.65x | CA$-245.69K | CA$149.05K | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2002 | -1.45x | CA$-111.02K | CA$76.65K | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2001 | -0.87x | CA$-113.67K | CA$130.95K | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2000 | -1.30x | CA$-186.97K | CA$144.15K | ▼ -343.7% |
| 1999 | 0.53x | CA$38.14K | CA$71.65K | ▲ +106.9% |
| 1998 | -7.70x | CA$-79.88K | CA$10.38K | — |