Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.08x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-20.88K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$255.54K) in one year. Check Kermode Resources Ltd investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kermode Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kermode Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. Also explore Kermode Resources Ltd total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kermode Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kermode Resources Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | CA$74.56K | CA$367.25K | ▲ +303.4% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | CA$-34.64K | CA$347.12K | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | CA$-86.04K | CA$283.12K | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2022 | -0.81x | CA$-223.04K | CA$276.79K | ▼ -1344.5% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | CA$-25.80K | CA$462.42K | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2020 | -0.15x | CA$-73.62K | CA$482.23K | ▼ -101.4% |
| 2019 | -0.08x | CA$-24.45K | CA$322.56K | ▲ +93.8% |
| 2018 | -1.23x | CA$-310.39K | CA$252.97K | ▼ -1071.2% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | CA$-35.14K | CA$335.45K | ▼ -24946.1% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | CA$132.00 | CA$313.06K | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2015 | -0.68x | CA$-180.69K | CA$265.77K | ▼ -4294.5% |
| 2014 | -0.02x | CA$-4.92K | CA$317.95K | ▲ +98.3% |
| 2013 | -0.89x | CA$-250.24K | CA$281.39K | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2012 | -1.78x | CA$-311.26K | CA$175.03K | ▲ +54.0% |
| 2011 | -3.87x | CA$-191.69K | CA$49.58K | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2010 | -7.44x | CA$-314.18K | CA$42.25K | ▼ -150.7% |
| 2009 | -2.97x | CA$-148.46K | CA$50.05K | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2008 | -2.60x | CA$-149.32K | CA$57.36K | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2007 | -3.66x | CA$-754.62K | CA$206.45K | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2006 | -3.63x | CA$-358.31K | CA$98.69K | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2005 | -3.14x | CA$-359.81K | CA$114.41K | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2004 | -4.04x | CA$-411.66K | CA$102.00K | ▼ -144.8% |
| 2003 | -1.65x | CA$-245.69K | CA$149.05K | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2002 | -1.45x | CA$-111.02K | CA$76.65K | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2001 | -0.87x | CA$-113.67K | CA$130.95K | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2000 | -1.30x | CA$-186.97K | CA$144.15K | ▼ -343.7% |
| 1999 | 0.53x | CA$38.14K | CA$71.65K | ▲ +106.9% |
| 1998 | -7.70x | CA$-79.88K | CA$10.38K | — |