Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.08x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-20.88K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$255.54K) in one year. See Kermode Resources Ltd free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kermode Resources Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kermode Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Kermode Resources Ltd to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kermode Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kermode Resources Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Kermode Resources Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | CA$74.56K | CA$367.25K | ▲ +303.4% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | CA$-34.64K | CA$347.12K | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | CA$-86.04K | CA$283.12K | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2022 | -0.81x | CA$-223.04K | CA$276.79K | ▼ -1344.5% |
| 2021 | -0.06x | CA$-25.80K | CA$462.42K | ▲ +63.5% |
| 2020 | -0.15x | CA$-73.62K | CA$482.23K | ▼ -101.4% |
| 2019 | -0.08x | CA$-24.45K | CA$322.56K | ▲ +93.8% |
| 2018 | -1.23x | CA$-310.39K | CA$252.97K | ▼ -1071.2% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | CA$-35.14K | CA$335.45K | ▼ -24946.1% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | CA$132.00 | CA$313.06K | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2015 | -0.68x | CA$-180.69K | CA$265.77K | ▼ -4294.5% |
| 2014 | -0.02x | CA$-4.92K | CA$317.95K | ▲ +98.3% |
| 2013 | -0.89x | CA$-250.24K | CA$281.39K | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2012 | -1.78x | CA$-311.26K | CA$175.03K | ▲ +54.0% |
| 2011 | -3.87x | CA$-191.69K | CA$49.58K | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2010 | -7.44x | CA$-314.18K | CA$42.25K | ▼ -150.7% |
| 2009 | -2.97x | CA$-148.46K | CA$50.05K | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2008 | -2.60x | CA$-149.32K | CA$57.36K | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2007 | -3.66x | CA$-754.62K | CA$206.45K | ▼ -0.7% |
| 2006 | -3.63x | CA$-358.31K | CA$98.69K | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2005 | -3.14x | CA$-359.81K | CA$114.41K | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2004 | -4.04x | CA$-411.66K | CA$102.00K | ▼ -144.8% |
| 2003 | -1.65x | CA$-245.69K | CA$149.05K | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2002 | -1.45x | CA$-111.02K | CA$76.65K | ▼ -66.9% |
| 2001 | -0.87x | CA$-113.67K | CA$130.95K | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2000 | -1.30x | CA$-186.97K | CA$144.15K | ▼ -343.7% |
| 1999 | 0.53x | CA$38.14K | CA$71.65K | ▲ +106.9% |
| 1998 | -7.70x | CA$-79.88K | CA$10.38K | — |