Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of July 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$0.00) from net assets (CA$260.50K) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. See KLM working capital efficiency to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Kermode Resources Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1998–2024)
This chart shows how Kermode Resources Ltd's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 20 annual periods from 1998 to 2024. As of July 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of CA$260.50K with intangible assets of CA$0.00 CAD. See KLM days of operational coverage to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Kermode Resources Ltd (1998–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Kermode Resources Ltd from 1998 to 2024, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market value of Kermode Resources Ltd.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 100.0% | CA$851.06K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | CA$807.39K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.09 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | CA$350.00 | CA$0.00 | CA$277.14K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | CA$215.59K | CA$0.00 | CA$551.04K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$90.17K | CA$0.00 | CA$355.94K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$554.99K | CA$0.00 | CA$872.95K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$351.12K | CA$0.00 | CA$632.50K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$399.36K | CA$0.00 | CA$574.39K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$651.78K | CA$0.00 | CA$701.35K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$949.77K | CA$0.00 | CA$992.02K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$4.66 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.71 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$4.83 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.89 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$4.91 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.11 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$5.46 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.56 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$1.58 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$885.58K | CA$0.00 | CA$987.59K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$271.55K | CA$0.00 | CA$420.59K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$119.59K | CA$0.00 | CA$196.24K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$69.79K | CA$0.00 | CA$200.74K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$23.55K | CA$0.00 | CA$33.93K | — |