Kermode Resources Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Kermode Resources Ltd tangible net worth ratio. Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of July 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets (CA$0.00) from net assets (CA$260.50K) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check how strategically is Kermode Resources Ltd's equity deployed to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Kermode Resources Ltd (1998–2024)
Tangible net worth ratio of Kermode Resources Ltd from 1998 to 2024. This chart shows how Kermode Resources Ltd's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 20 annual periods from 1998 to 2024. As of July 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of CA$260.50K with intangible assets of CA$0.00 CAD. See how liquid is Kermode Resources Ltd's working capital to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Kermode Resources Ltd Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
Kermode Resources Ltd tangible net worth ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Kermode Resources Ltd from 1998 to 2024, covering 20 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see KLM company net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (CAD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 100.0% | CA$851.06K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | CA$807.39K | CA$0.00 | CA$1.09 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | CA$350.00 | CA$0.00 | CA$277.14K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | CA$215.59K | CA$0.00 | CA$551.04K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | CA$90.17K | CA$0.00 | CA$355.94K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | CA$554.99K | CA$0.00 | CA$872.95K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | CA$351.12K | CA$0.00 | CA$632.50K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | CA$399.36K | CA$0.00 | CA$574.39K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | CA$651.78K | CA$0.00 | CA$701.35K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$949.77K | CA$0.00 | CA$992.02K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | CA$4.66 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.71 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | CA$4.83 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$4.89 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | CA$4.91 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.11 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | CA$5.46 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$5.56 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | CA$1.58 Million | CA$0.00 | CA$1.70 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | CA$885.58K | CA$0.00 | CA$987.59K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | CA$271.55K | CA$0.00 | CA$420.59K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | CA$119.59K | CA$0.00 | CA$196.24K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2001 | 100.0% | CA$69.79K | CA$0.00 | CA$200.74K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | CA$23.55K | CA$0.00 | CA$33.93K | — |