Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) — Financial Flexibility Index
Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) has a Financial Flexibility Index of -0.08x as of January 2026. Free cash flow of CA$-20.88K (operating CF CA$-20.88K minus capex CA$0.00) represents 0% of total liabilities (CA$255.54K). Also explore Kermode Resources Ltd annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Financial Flexibility Index
Free Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Capital Expenditures
Kermode Resources Ltd Financial Flexibility Index (1998–2025)
Historical Financial Flexibility Index trend for Kermode Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. Check Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) strategic investment index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Annual Financial Flexibility Index for Kermode Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year free cash flow to debt coverage for Kermode Resources Ltd. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) market capitalisation.
| Year | Flexibility Index | Free Cash Flow (CAD) | Operating CF | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.44x | CA$161.50K | CA$74.56K | CA$367.25K | ▲ +578.0% |
| 2024 | -0.09x | CA$-31.94K | CA$-34.64K | CA$347.12K | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2023 | -0.25x | CA$-71.01K | CA$-86.04K | CA$283.12K | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2022 | -0.53x | CA$-147.20K | CA$-223.04K | CA$276.79K | ▼ -1036.3% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | CA$26.26K | CA$-25.80K | CA$462.42K | ▲ +227.0% |
| 2020 | -0.04x | CA$-21.56K | CA$-73.62K | CA$482.23K | ▼ -152.2% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | CA$27.61K | CA$-24.45K | CA$322.56K | ▲ +108.4% |
| 2018 | -1.02x | CA$-258.33K | CA$-310.39K | CA$252.97K | ▼ -874.8% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | CA$-35.14K | CA$-35.14K | CA$335.45K | ▼ -24946.1% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | CA$132.00 | CA$132.00 | CA$313.06K | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2015 | -0.68x | CA$-180.24K | CA$-180.69K | CA$265.77K | ▼ -200.4% |
| 2014 | 0.68x | CA$214.85K | CA$-4.92K | CA$317.95K | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2013 | 0.58x | CA$162.82K | CA$-250.24K | CA$281.39K | ▲ +178.3% |
| 2012 | -0.74x | CA$-129.39K | CA$-311.26K | CA$175.03K | ▲ +75.5% |
| 2011 | -3.02x | CA$-149.80K | CA$-191.69K | CA$49.58K | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2010 | -6.75x | CA$-285.01K | CA$-314.18K | CA$42.25K | ▼ -465.9% |
| 2009 | -1.19x | CA$-59.66K | CA$-148.46K | CA$50.05K | ▼ -1469.7% |
| 2008 | -0.08x | CA$-4.36K | CA$-149.32K | CA$57.36K | ▼ -102.8% |
| 2007 | 2.75x | CA$568.00K | CA$-754.62K | CA$206.45K | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2006 | 1.63x | CA$160.88K | CA$-358.31K | CA$98.69K | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2005 | 2.75x | CA$314.75K | CA$-359.81K | CA$114.41K | ▲ +875.3% |
| 2004 | -0.35x | CA$-36.19K | CA$-411.66K | CA$102.00K | ▼ -417.2% |
| 2003 | -0.07x | CA$-10.22K | CA$-245.69K | CA$149.05K | ▼ -123.6% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | CA$22.24K | CA$-111.02K | CA$76.65K | ▲ +134.3% |
| 2001 | -0.84x | CA$-110.65K | CA$-113.67K | CA$130.95K | ▼ -302.6% |
| 2000 | 0.42x | CA$60.11K | CA$-186.97K | CA$144.15K | ▼ -21.7% |
| 1999 | 0.53x | CA$38.14K | CA$38.14K | CA$71.65K | ▲ +106.9% |
| 1998 | -7.70x | CA$-79.88K | CA$-79.88K | CA$10.38K | — |