Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) — Financial Flexibility Index
Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) has a Financial Flexibility Index of -0.08x as of January 2026. Free cash flow of CA$-20.88K (operating CF CA$-20.88K minus capex CA$0.00) represents 0% of total liabilities (CA$255.54K). Check asset allocation strategy of Kermode Resources Ltd to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Financial Flexibility Index
Free Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Capital Expenditures
Kermode Resources Ltd Financial Flexibility Index (1998–2025)
Historical Financial Flexibility Index trend for Kermode Resources Ltd across 28 annual periods. See KLM net working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Financial Flexibility Index for Kermode Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year free cash flow to debt coverage for Kermode Resources Ltd. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) total market value.
| Year | Flexibility Index | Free Cash Flow (CAD) | Operating CF | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.44x | CA$161.50K | CA$74.56K | CA$367.25K | ▲ +578.0% |
| 2024 | -0.09x | CA$-31.94K | CA$-34.64K | CA$347.12K | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2023 | -0.25x | CA$-71.01K | CA$-86.04K | CA$283.12K | ▲ +52.8% |
| 2022 | -0.53x | CA$-147.20K | CA$-223.04K | CA$276.79K | ▼ -1036.3% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | CA$26.26K | CA$-25.80K | CA$462.42K | ▲ +227.0% |
| 2020 | -0.04x | CA$-21.56K | CA$-73.62K | CA$482.23K | ▼ -152.2% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | CA$27.61K | CA$-24.45K | CA$322.56K | ▲ +108.4% |
| 2018 | -1.02x | CA$-258.33K | CA$-310.39K | CA$252.97K | ▼ -874.8% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | CA$-35.14K | CA$-35.14K | CA$335.45K | ▼ -24946.1% |
| 2016 | 0.00x | CA$132.00 | CA$132.00 | CA$313.06K | ▲ +100.1% |
| 2015 | -0.68x | CA$-180.24K | CA$-180.69K | CA$265.77K | ▼ -200.4% |
| 2014 | 0.68x | CA$214.85K | CA$-4.92K | CA$317.95K | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2013 | 0.58x | CA$162.82K | CA$-250.24K | CA$281.39K | ▲ +178.3% |
| 2012 | -0.74x | CA$-129.39K | CA$-311.26K | CA$175.03K | ▲ +75.5% |
| 2011 | -3.02x | CA$-149.80K | CA$-191.69K | CA$49.58K | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2010 | -6.75x | CA$-285.01K | CA$-314.18K | CA$42.25K | ▼ -465.9% |
| 2009 | -1.19x | CA$-59.66K | CA$-148.46K | CA$50.05K | ▼ -1469.7% |
| 2008 | -0.08x | CA$-4.36K | CA$-149.32K | CA$57.36K | ▼ -102.8% |
| 2007 | 2.75x | CA$568.00K | CA$-754.62K | CA$206.45K | ▲ +68.8% |
| 2006 | 1.63x | CA$160.88K | CA$-358.31K | CA$98.69K | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2005 | 2.75x | CA$314.75K | CA$-359.81K | CA$114.41K | ▲ +875.3% |
| 2004 | -0.35x | CA$-36.19K | CA$-411.66K | CA$102.00K | ▼ -417.2% |
| 2003 | -0.07x | CA$-10.22K | CA$-245.69K | CA$149.05K | ▼ -123.6% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | CA$22.24K | CA$-111.02K | CA$76.65K | ▲ +134.3% |
| 2001 | -0.84x | CA$-110.65K | CA$-113.67K | CA$130.95K | ▼ -302.6% |
| 2000 | 0.42x | CA$60.11K | CA$-186.97K | CA$144.15K | ▼ -21.7% |
| 1999 | 0.53x | CA$38.14K | CA$38.14K | CA$71.65K | ▲ +106.9% |
| 1998 | -7.70x | CA$-79.88K | CA$-79.88K | CA$10.38K | — |