Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) — Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 100.0% as of January 2026. Working capital of CA$-239.74K (current assets of CA$15.80K minus current liabilities of CA$255.54K) is measured against net assets of CA$-239.74K. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. See KLM defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Kermode Resources Ltd Working Capital to Net Assets (1998–2025)
This chart shows how Kermode Resources Ltd's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of January 2026, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting working capital of CA$-239.74K against net assets of CA$-239.74K CAD. For the complete balance sheet picture, see KLM current and non-current assets.
Annual Working Capital to Net Assets for Kermode Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Kermode Resources Ltd from 1998 to 2025, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Read total liabilities of Kermode Resources Ltd for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (CAD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | CA$-328.09K | CA$-328.09K | CA$39.15K | CA$367.25K | ▲ +137.4 pp |
| 2024 | -37.4% | CA$-318.47K | CA$851.06K | CA$28.66K | CA$347.12K | ▼ -5.5 pp |
| 2023 | -31.9% | CA$-257.40K | CA$807.39K | CA$25.72K | CA$283.12K | ▲ +62165.3 pp |
| 2022 | -62197.1% | CA$-217.69K | CA$350.00 | CA$59.10K | CA$276.79K | ▼ -62346.3 pp |
| 2021 | 149.1% | CA$-285.95K | CA$-191.73K | CA$176.47K | CA$462.42K | ▲ +49.1 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | CA$-372.90K | CA$-372.90K | CA$109.32K | CA$482.23K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | CA$-275.16K | CA$-275.16K | CA$47.40K | CA$322.56K | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | CA$-146.02K | CA$-146.02K | CA$106.95K | CA$252.97K | ▲ +255.6 pp |
| 2017 | -155.6% | CA$-335.41K | CA$215.59K | CA$40.00 | CA$335.45K | ▼ -255.6 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | CA$-306.62K | CA$-306.62K | CA$6.44K | CA$313.06K | ▲ +333.3 pp |
| 2015 | -233.3% | CA$-210.33K | CA$90.17K | CA$55.44K | CA$265.77K | ▼ -182.3 pp |
| 2014 | -50.9% | CA$-282.65K | CA$554.99K | CA$35.30K | CA$317.95K | ▲ +19.8 pp |
| 2013 | -70.7% | CA$-248.27K | CA$351.12K | CA$33.12K | CA$281.39K | ▼ -80.9 pp |
| 2012 | 10.2% | CA$40.84K | CA$399.36K | CA$215.87K | CA$175.03K | ▼ -62.0 pp |
| 2011 | 72.2% | CA$470.63K | CA$651.78K | CA$520.20K | CA$49.58K | ▼ -27.8 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | CA$949.77K | CA$949.77K | CA$992.02K | CA$42.25K | ▲ +72.8 pp |
| 2009 | 27.2% | CA$1.27 Million | CA$4.66 Million | CA$1.32 Million | CA$50.05K | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 2008 | 31.5% | CA$1.52 Million | CA$4.83 Million | CA$1.58 Million | CA$57.36K | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 2007 | 32.9% | CA$1.62 Million | CA$4.91 Million | CA$1.82 Million | CA$206.45K | ▼ -33.4 pp |
| 2006 | 66.4% | CA$3.62 Million | CA$5.46 Million | CA$3.72 Million | CA$98.69K | ▲ +54.8 pp |
| 2005 | 11.5% | CA$182.54K | CA$1.58 Million | CA$296.95K | CA$114.41K | ▼ -12.8 pp |
| 2004 | 24.4% | CA$215.82K | CA$885.58K | CA$317.82K | CA$102.00K | ▲ +78.8 pp |
| 2003 | -54.4% | CA$-147.74K | CA$271.55K | CA$1.30K | CA$149.05K | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2002 | -56.3% | CA$-67.35K | CA$119.59K | CA$9.30K | CA$76.65K | ▼ -89.9 pp |
| 2001 | 33.6% | CA$23.42K | CA$69.79K | CA$154.37K | CA$130.95K | ▼ -68.3 pp |
| 2000 | 101.9% | CA$-102.03K | CA$-100.16K | CA$42.12K | CA$144.15K | ▼ -698.7 pp |
| 1999 | 800.5% | CA$-63.96K | CA$-7.99K | CA$7.69K | CA$71.65K | ▲ +716.7 pp |
| 1998 | 83.8% | CA$19.74K | CA$23.55K | CA$30.11K | CA$10.38K | — |