Kermode Resources Ltd Net Asset Quality Index
Kermode Resources Ltd net asset quality index. Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -1517.1% as of January 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$15.80K minus total liabilities of CA$255.54K yields net assets of CA$-239.74K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See what is Kermode Resources Ltd's book value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Kermode Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
Net asset quality index of Kermode Resources Ltd from 1998 to 2025. This chart shows how Kermode Resources Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of January 2026, the index stands at -1517.1%, representing net assets of CA$-239.74K against total assets of CA$15.80K CAD. Check KLM strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Kermode Resources Ltd Net Asset Quality Index by Year (1998–2025)
Kermode Resources Ltd net asset quality index by year from 1998 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Kermode Resources Ltd from 1998 to 2025, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market value of Kermode Resources Ltd.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -838.0% | CA$-328.09K | CA$39.15K | CA$367.25K | ▼ -909.0 pp |
| 2024 | 71.0% | CA$851.06K | CA$1.20 Million | CA$347.12K | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2023 | 74.0% | CA$807.39K | CA$1.09 Million | CA$283.12K | ▲ +73.9 pp |
| 2022 | 0.1% | CA$350.00 | CA$277.14K | CA$276.79K | ▲ +71.0 pp |
| 2021 | -70.8% | CA$-191.73K | CA$270.69K | CA$462.42K | ▲ +270.3 pp |
| 2020 | -341.1% | CA$-372.90K | CA$109.32K | CA$482.23K | ▲ +239.4 pp |
| 2019 | -580.5% | CA$-275.16K | CA$47.40K | CA$322.56K | ▼ -444.0 pp |
| 2018 | -136.5% | CA$-146.02K | CA$106.95K | CA$252.97K | ▼ -175.7 pp |
| 2017 | 39.1% | CA$215.59K | CA$551.04K | CA$335.45K | ▲ +4801.1 pp |
| 2016 | -4762.0% | CA$-306.62K | CA$6.44K | CA$313.06K | ▼ -4787.3 pp |
| 2015 | 25.3% | CA$90.17K | CA$355.94K | CA$265.77K | ▼ -38.2 pp |
| 2014 | 63.6% | CA$554.99K | CA$872.95K | CA$317.95K | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 2013 | 55.5% | CA$351.12K | CA$632.50K | CA$281.39K | ▼ -14.0 pp |
| 2012 | 69.5% | CA$399.36K | CA$574.39K | CA$175.03K | ▼ -23.4 pp |
| 2011 | 92.9% | CA$651.78K | CA$701.35K | CA$49.58K | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2010 | 95.7% | CA$949.77K | CA$992.02K | CA$42.25K | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2009 | 98.9% | CA$4.66 Million | CA$4.71 Million | CA$50.05K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2008 | 98.8% | CA$4.83 Million | CA$4.89 Million | CA$57.36K | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2007 | 96.0% | CA$4.91 Million | CA$5.11 Million | CA$206.45K | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2006 | 98.2% | CA$5.46 Million | CA$5.56 Million | CA$98.69K | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2005 | 93.3% | CA$1.58 Million | CA$1.70 Million | CA$114.41K | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2004 | 89.7% | CA$885.58K | CA$987.59K | CA$102.00K | ▲ +25.1 pp |
| 2003 | 64.6% | CA$271.55K | CA$420.59K | CA$149.05K | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2002 | 60.9% | CA$119.59K | CA$196.24K | CA$76.65K | ▲ +26.2 pp |
| 2001 | 34.8% | CA$69.79K | CA$200.74K | CA$130.95K | ▲ +262.4 pp |
| 2000 | -227.7% | CA$-100.16K | CA$43.99K | CA$144.15K | ▼ -215.1 pp |
| 1999 | -12.6% | CA$-7.99K | CA$63.66K | CA$71.65K | ▼ -82.0 pp |
| 1998 | 69.4% | CA$23.55K | CA$33.93K | CA$10.38K | — |