Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) — Net Asset Quality Index
Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -1517.1% as of January 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$15.80K minus total liabilities of CA$255.54K yields net assets of CA$-239.74K. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Also explore balance sheet size of Kermode Resources Ltd for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Kermode Resources Ltd Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1998–2025)
This chart shows how Kermode Resources Ltd's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of January 2026, the index stands at -1517.1%, representing net assets of CA$-239.74K against total assets of CA$15.80K CAD. See Kermode Resources Ltd (KLM) working capital ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Kermode Resources Ltd (1998–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Kermode Resources Ltd from 1998 to 2025, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see KLM stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -838.0% | CA$-328.09K | CA$39.15K | CA$367.25K | ▼ -909.0 pp |
| 2024 | 71.0% | CA$851.06K | CA$1.20 Million | CA$347.12K | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2023 | 74.0% | CA$807.39K | CA$1.09 Million | CA$283.12K | ▲ +73.9 pp |
| 2022 | 0.1% | CA$350.00 | CA$277.14K | CA$276.79K | ▲ +71.0 pp |
| 2021 | -70.8% | CA$-191.73K | CA$270.69K | CA$462.42K | ▲ +270.3 pp |
| 2020 | -341.1% | CA$-372.90K | CA$109.32K | CA$482.23K | ▲ +239.4 pp |
| 2019 | -580.5% | CA$-275.16K | CA$47.40K | CA$322.56K | ▼ -444.0 pp |
| 2018 | -136.5% | CA$-146.02K | CA$106.95K | CA$252.97K | ▼ -175.7 pp |
| 2017 | 39.1% | CA$215.59K | CA$551.04K | CA$335.45K | ▲ +4801.1 pp |
| 2016 | -4762.0% | CA$-306.62K | CA$6.44K | CA$313.06K | ▼ -4787.3 pp |
| 2015 | 25.3% | CA$90.17K | CA$355.94K | CA$265.77K | ▼ -38.2 pp |
| 2014 | 63.6% | CA$554.99K | CA$872.95K | CA$317.95K | ▲ +8.1 pp |
| 2013 | 55.5% | CA$351.12K | CA$632.50K | CA$281.39K | ▼ -14.0 pp |
| 2012 | 69.5% | CA$399.36K | CA$574.39K | CA$175.03K | ▼ -23.4 pp |
| 2011 | 92.9% | CA$651.78K | CA$701.35K | CA$49.58K | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2010 | 95.7% | CA$949.77K | CA$992.02K | CA$42.25K | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2009 | 98.9% | CA$4.66 Million | CA$4.71 Million | CA$50.05K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2008 | 98.8% | CA$4.83 Million | CA$4.89 Million | CA$57.36K | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2007 | 96.0% | CA$4.91 Million | CA$5.11 Million | CA$206.45K | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2006 | 98.2% | CA$5.46 Million | CA$5.56 Million | CA$98.69K | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2005 | 93.3% | CA$1.58 Million | CA$1.70 Million | CA$114.41K | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2004 | 89.7% | CA$885.58K | CA$987.59K | CA$102.00K | ▲ +25.1 pp |
| 2003 | 64.6% | CA$271.55K | CA$420.59K | CA$149.05K | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2002 | 60.9% | CA$119.59K | CA$196.24K | CA$76.65K | ▲ +26.2 pp |
| 2001 | 34.8% | CA$69.79K | CA$200.74K | CA$130.95K | ▲ +262.4 pp |
| 2000 | -227.7% | CA$-100.16K | CA$43.99K | CA$144.15K | ▼ -215.1 pp |
| 1999 | -12.6% | CA$-7.99K | CA$63.66K | CA$71.65K | ▼ -82.0 pp |
| 1998 | 69.4% | CA$23.55K | CA$33.93K | CA$10.38K | — |