City Holding Company (CHCO) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
City Holding Company (CHCO) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($32.64 Million) in capital expenditures ($823.00K). Check tangible net worth ratio of City Holding Company to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
City Holding Company Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1989–2025)
This chart tracks City Holding Company's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see City Holding Company cash conversion from operations.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for City Holding Company (1989–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for City Holding Company from 1989 to 2025. See City Holding Company free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $131.37 Million | $2.92 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $131.90 Million | $2.71 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $137.58 Million | $2.96 Million | ▲ +16.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $115.82 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $102.27 Million | $3.32 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $89.80 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $98.64 Million | $4.73 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $77.57 Million | $10.19 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $76.13 Million | $6.57 Million | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $65.33 Million | $5.52 Million | ▲ +34.2% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $47.90 Million | $3.01 Million | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $53.35 Million | $2.32 Million | ▼ -55.8% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $75.89 Million | $7.48 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $53.81 Million | $7.51 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $59.44 Million | $4.62 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $68.33 Million | $5.04 Million | ▼ -79.2% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $25.03 Million | $8.89 Million | ▲ +84.7% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $54.56 Million | $10.49 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | $50.35 Million | $14.42 Million | ▲ +165.4% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $59.15 Million | $6.38 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $52.37 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $53.89 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $42.21 Million | $1.95 Million | ▲ +543.8% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $52.06 Million | $373.00K | ▼ -91.3% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $42.40 Million | $3.51 Million | ▲ +12503.0% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $147.63 Million | $97.00K | ▼ -99.1% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $105.59 Million | $7.94 Million | ▼ -68.3% |
| 1996 | 0.24x | $66.20 Million | $15.70 Million | ▼ -57.7% |
| 1993 | 0.56x | $9.10 Million | $5.10 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 1992 | 0.32x | $7.30 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +120.5% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $4.20 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +14.3% |
| 1990 | 0.13x | $4.00 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -32.1% |
| 1989 | 0.18x | $3.80 Million | $700.00K | — |