City Holding Company (CHCO) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
City Holding Company (CHCO) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($38.01 Million) in capital expenditures ($726.00K). See City Holding Company (CHCO) net asset quality to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
City Holding Company Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1989–2025)
This chart tracks City Holding Company's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 33 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of City Holding Company to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for City Holding Company (1989–2025)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for City Holding Company from 1989 to 2025. For live market cap and broader valuation context, see market value of City Holding Company.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $131.37 Million | $2.92 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $131.90 Million | $2.71 Million | ▼ -4.7% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $137.58 Million | $2.96 Million | ▲ +16.5% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $115.82 Million | $2.14 Million | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $102.27 Million | $3.32 Million | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $89.80 Million | $5.54 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $98.64 Million | $4.73 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $77.57 Million | $10.19 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $76.13 Million | $6.57 Million | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $65.33 Million | $5.52 Million | ▲ +34.2% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $47.90 Million | $3.01 Million | ▲ +44.5% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $53.35 Million | $2.32 Million | ▼ -55.8% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $75.89 Million | $7.48 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $53.81 Million | $7.51 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $59.44 Million | $4.62 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $68.33 Million | $5.04 Million | ▼ -79.2% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $25.03 Million | $8.89 Million | ▲ +84.7% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $54.56 Million | $10.49 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2007 | 0.29x | $50.35 Million | $14.42 Million | ▲ +165.4% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $59.15 Million | $6.38 Million | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $52.37 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $53.89 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $42.21 Million | $1.95 Million | ▲ +543.8% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $52.06 Million | $373.00K | ▼ -91.3% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $42.40 Million | $3.51 Million | ▲ +12503.0% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $147.63 Million | $97.00K | ▼ -99.1% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $105.59 Million | $7.94 Million | ▼ -68.3% |
| 1996 | 0.24x | $66.20 Million | $15.70 Million | ▼ -57.7% |
| 1993 | 0.56x | $9.10 Million | $5.10 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 1992 | 0.32x | $7.30 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +120.5% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $4.20 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +14.3% |
| 1990 | 0.13x | $4.00 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -32.1% |
| 1989 | 0.18x | $3.80 Million | $700.00K | — |