City Holding Company (CHCO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
City Holding Company (CHCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $38.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.97 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of City Holding Company to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
City Holding Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for City Holding Company across 37 annual periods. Also explore City Holding Company (CHCO) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for City Holding Company (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for City Holding Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of City Holding Company.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $131.37 Million | $5.91 Billion | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $131.90 Million | $5.73 Billion | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $137.58 Million | $5.49 Billion | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $115.82 Million | $5.30 Billion | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $102.27 Million | $5.32 Billion | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $89.80 Million | $5.06 Billion | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2019 | 24.32x | $98.64 Million | $4.06 Million | ▲ +134629.0% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $77.57 Million | $4.30 Billion | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $76.13 Million | $3.63 Billion | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $65.33 Million | $3.53 Billion | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $47.90 Million | $3.29 Billion | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $53.35 Million | $3.07 Billion | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $75.89 Million | $2.98 Billion | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $53.81 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $59.44 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2010 | 0.03x | $68.33 Million | $2.32 Billion | ▲ +172.0% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $25.03 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $54.56 Million | $2.30 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $50.35 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $59.15 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $52.37 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $53.89 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $42.21 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $52.06 Million | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $42.40 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $147.63 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +44.8% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $105.59 Million | $2.51 Billion | ▲ +179.8% |
| 1998 | -0.05x | $-131.20 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▼ -208.0% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | $-35.40 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▼ -125.1% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $66.20 Million | $969.40 Million | ▲ +181.3% |
| 1995 | -0.08x | $-81.30 Million | $967.90 Million | ▼ -197.9% |
| 1994 | -0.03x | $-20.40 Million | $723.60 Million | ▼ -284.0% |
| 1993 | 0.02x | $9.10 Million | $593.80 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $7.30 Million | $488.70 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 1991 | 0.01x | $4.20 Million | $321.20 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 1990 | 0.01x | $4.00 Million | $311.80 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 1989 | 0.01x | $3.80 Million | $280.70 Million | — |