City Holding Company (CHCO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
City Holding Company (CHCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $38.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.97 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of City Holding Company to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
City Holding Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for City Holding Company across 37 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of City Holding Company for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for City Holding Company (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for City Holding Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of City Holding Company.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $131.37 Million | $5.91 Billion | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $131.90 Million | $5.73 Billion | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $137.58 Million | $5.49 Billion | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $115.82 Million | $5.30 Billion | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $102.27 Million | $5.32 Billion | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $89.80 Million | $5.06 Billion | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2019 | 24.32x | $98.64 Million | $4.06 Million | ▲ +134629.0% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $77.57 Million | $4.30 Billion | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $76.13 Million | $3.63 Billion | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $65.33 Million | $3.53 Billion | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $47.90 Million | $3.29 Billion | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $53.35 Million | $3.07 Billion | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $75.89 Million | $2.98 Billion | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $53.81 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $59.44 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2010 | 0.03x | $68.33 Million | $2.32 Billion | ▲ +172.0% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $25.03 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $54.56 Million | $2.30 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $50.35 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $59.15 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $52.37 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $53.89 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $42.21 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $52.06 Million | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $42.40 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $147.63 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +44.8% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $105.59 Million | $2.51 Billion | ▲ +179.8% |
| 1998 | -0.05x | $-131.20 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▼ -208.0% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | $-35.40 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▼ -125.1% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $66.20 Million | $969.40 Million | ▲ +181.3% |
| 1995 | -0.08x | $-81.30 Million | $967.90 Million | ▼ -197.9% |
| 1994 | -0.03x | $-20.40 Million | $723.60 Million | ▼ -284.0% |
| 1993 | 0.02x | $9.10 Million | $593.80 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $7.30 Million | $488.70 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 1991 | 0.01x | $4.20 Million | $321.20 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 1990 | 0.01x | $4.00 Million | $311.80 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 1989 | 0.01x | $3.80 Million | $280.70 Million | — |