City Holding Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
City Holding Company cash flow-to-debt ratio. City Holding Company (CHCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $32.64 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.97 Billion) in one year. Check City Holding Company cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of City Holding Company (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of City Holding Company from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for City Holding Company across 37 annual periods. Check City Holding Company cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
City Holding Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
City Holding Company cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for City Holding Company. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see City Holding Company (CHCO) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $131.37 Million | $5.91 Billion | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $131.90 Million | $5.73 Billion | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $137.58 Million | $5.49 Billion | ▲ +14.7% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $115.82 Million | $5.30 Billion | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $102.27 Million | $5.32 Billion | ▲ +8.2% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $89.80 Million | $5.06 Billion | ▼ -99.9% |
| 2019 | 24.32x | $98.64 Million | $4.06 Million | ▲ +134629.0% |
| 2018 | 0.02x | $77.57 Million | $4.30 Billion | ▼ -13.9% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $76.13 Million | $3.63 Billion | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $65.33 Million | $3.53 Billion | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $47.90 Million | $3.29 Billion | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | $53.35 Million | $3.07 Billion | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $75.89 Million | $2.98 Billion | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2012 | 0.02x | $53.81 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $59.44 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2010 | 0.03x | $68.33 Million | $2.32 Billion | ▲ +172.0% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | $25.03 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $54.56 Million | $2.30 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | $50.35 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $59.15 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $52.37 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2004 | 0.03x | $53.89 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $42.21 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $52.06 Million | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $42.40 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $147.63 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +44.8% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $105.59 Million | $2.51 Billion | ▲ +179.8% |
| 1998 | -0.05x | $-131.20 Million | $2.49 Billion | ▼ -208.0% |
| 1997 | -0.02x | $-35.40 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▼ -125.1% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $66.20 Million | $969.40 Million | ▲ +181.3% |
| 1995 | -0.08x | $-81.30 Million | $967.90 Million | ▼ -197.9% |
| 1994 | -0.03x | $-20.40 Million | $723.60 Million | ▼ -284.0% |
| 1993 | 0.02x | $9.10 Million | $593.80 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $7.30 Million | $488.70 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 1991 | 0.01x | $4.20 Million | $321.20 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 1990 | 0.01x | $4.00 Million | $311.80 Million | ▼ -5.2% |
| 1989 | 0.01x | $3.80 Million | $280.70 Million | — |