Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co capital reinvestment ratio. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.23x as of September 2025, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($637.99K) in capital expenditures ($145.92K). Check Chicago Rivet & Machine Co total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Capital Reinvestment Ratio of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (1991–2020)
Capital reinvestment ratio of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co from 1991 to 2020. This chart tracks Chicago Rivet & Machine Co's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 30 annual periods. Also explore CVR net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Capital Reinvestment Ratio by Year (1991–2020)
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co capital reinvestment ratio by year from 1991 to 2020. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1.32x | $623.80K | $824.14K | ▲ +132.4% |
| 2019 | 0.57x | $3.17 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -46.5% |
| 2018 | 1.06x | $1.88 Million | $2.00 Million | ▲ +138.5% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | $2.99 Million | $1.33 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2016 | 0.50x | $4.03 Million | $2.03 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2015 | 0.51x | $4.09 Million | $2.08 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2014 | 0.70x | $2.36 Million | $1.66 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2013 | 1.13x | $3.06 Million | $3.44 Million | ▲ +186.5% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | $2.78 Million | $1.09 Million | ▼ -72.2% |
| 2011 | 1.41x | $1.08 Million | $1.52 Million | ▲ +146.8% |
| 2010 | 0.57x | $1.18 Million | $675.08K | ▼ -58.0% |
| 2009 | 1.36x | $315.14K | $429.52K | ▲ +336.6% |
| 2008 | 0.31x | $1.19 Million | $370.92K | ▲ +117.9% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $2.84 Million | $406.29K | ▼ -78.0% |
| 2006 | 0.65x | $2.04 Million | $1.33 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2005 | 0.93x | $693.15K | $643.31K | ▲ +60.3% |
| 2004 | 0.58x | $2.32 Million | $1.34 Million | ▲ +243.7% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $3.81 Million | $641.72K | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $4.01 Million | $886.01K | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2001 | 0.27x | $5.29 Million | $1.43 Million | ▼ -39.2% |
| 2000 | 0.45x | $4.77 Million | $2.13 Million | ▲ +38.8% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | $5.30 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 1998 | 0.84x | $3.20 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +414.7% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | $6.10 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 1996 | 0.32x | $2.80 Million | $900.00K | ▲ +510.7% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $3.80 Million | $200.00K | ▼ -72.4% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | $2.10 Million | $400.00K | ▼ -70.6% |
| 1993 | 0.65x | $1.70 Million | $1.10 Million | ▲ +1.7% |
| 1992 | 0.64x | $1.10 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +27.3% |
| 1991 | 0.50x | $1.60 Million | $800.00K | — |