Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) — Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.23x as of September 2025, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($637.99K) in capital expenditures ($145.92K). Check Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) tangible equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Capital Reinvestment Ratio (1991–2020)
This chart tracks Chicago Rivet & Machine Co's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CVR cash generation efficiency.
Annual Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (1991–2020)
Year-by-year Capital Reinvestment Ratio for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co from 1991 to 2020. See CVR free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1.32x | $623.80K | $824.14K | ▲ +132.4% |
| 2019 | 0.57x | $3.17 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -46.5% |
| 2018 | 1.06x | $1.88 Million | $2.00 Million | ▲ +138.5% |
| 2017 | 0.45x | $2.99 Million | $1.33 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2016 | 0.50x | $4.03 Million | $2.03 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2015 | 0.51x | $4.09 Million | $2.08 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2014 | 0.70x | $2.36 Million | $1.66 Million | ▼ -37.6% |
| 2013 | 1.13x | $3.06 Million | $3.44 Million | ▲ +186.5% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | $2.78 Million | $1.09 Million | ▼ -72.2% |
| 2011 | 1.41x | $1.08 Million | $1.52 Million | ▲ +146.8% |
| 2010 | 0.57x | $1.18 Million | $675.08K | ▼ -58.0% |
| 2009 | 1.36x | $315.14K | $429.52K | ▲ +336.6% |
| 2008 | 0.31x | $1.19 Million | $370.92K | ▲ +117.9% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $2.84 Million | $406.29K | ▼ -78.0% |
| 2006 | 0.65x | $2.04 Million | $1.33 Million | ▼ -29.8% |
| 2005 | 0.93x | $693.15K | $643.31K | ▲ +60.3% |
| 2004 | 0.58x | $2.32 Million | $1.34 Million | ▲ +243.7% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $3.81 Million | $641.72K | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $4.01 Million | $886.01K | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2001 | 0.27x | $5.29 Million | $1.43 Million | ▼ -39.2% |
| 2000 | 0.45x | $4.77 Million | $2.13 Million | ▲ +38.8% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | $5.30 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 1998 | 0.84x | $3.20 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +414.7% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | $6.10 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 1996 | 0.32x | $2.80 Million | $900.00K | ▲ +510.7% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $3.80 Million | $200.00K | ▼ -72.4% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | $2.10 Million | $400.00K | ▼ -70.6% |
| 1993 | 0.65x | $1.70 Million | $1.10 Million | ▲ +1.7% |
| 1992 | 0.64x | $1.10 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +27.3% |
| 1991 | 0.50x | $1.60 Million | $800.00K | — |