Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 9.44x as of September 2025. Operating cash flow of $637.99K exceeds net income of $67.57K, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Also explore balance sheet size of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Cash Flow Quality Index (1985–2022)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co across 30 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check tangible equity quality of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (1985–2022)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see market value of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -0.44x | $-1.26 Million | $2.87 Million | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2021 | -0.91x | $-1.01 Million | $1.11 Million | ▼ -107.3% |
| 2020 | 12.36x | $623.80K | $50.45K | ▲ +109.9% |
| 2019 | 5.89x | $3.17 Million | $538.31K | ▲ +527.0% |
| 2018 | 0.94x | $1.88 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2017 | 1.44x | $2.99 Million | $2.08 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2016 | 1.71x | $4.03 Million | $2.36 Million | ▼ -29.5% |
| 2015 | 2.42x | $4.09 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +100.7% |
| 2014 | 1.21x | $2.36 Million | $1.95 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2013 | 1.23x | $3.06 Million | $2.48 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2012 | 1.59x | $2.78 Million | $1.75 Million | ▲ +85.3% |
| 2011 | 0.86x | $1.08 Million | $1.25 Million | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2010 | 1.95x | $1.18 Million | $606.02K | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2007 | 2.24x | $2.84 Million | $1.27 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2006 | 1.82x | $2.04 Million | $1.12 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2004 | 1.52x | $2.32 Million | $1.52 Million | ▼ -67.3% |
| 2003 | 4.66x | $3.81 Million | $817.53K | ▲ +202.8% |
| 2002 | 1.54x | $4.01 Million | $2.60 Million | ▼ -47.8% |
| 2001 | 2.95x | $5.29 Million | $1.79 Million | ▲ +64.2% |
| 2000 | 1.80x | $4.77 Million | $2.66 Million | ▲ +18.7% |
| 1999 | 1.51x | $5.30 Million | $3.50 Million | ▲ +60.9% |
| 1998 | 0.94x | $3.20 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -39.8% |
| 1997 | 1.56x | $6.10 Million | $3.90 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 1996 | 1.47x | $2.80 Million | $1.90 Million | ▼ -14.7% |
| 1995 | 1.73x | $3.80 Million | $2.20 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 1994 | 1.11x | $2.10 Million | $1.90 Million | ▼ -9.0% |
| 1993 | 1.21x | $1.70 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 1992 | 1.10x | $1.10 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -45.0% |
| 1991 | 2.00x | $1.60 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -78.2% |
| 1985 | 9.17x | $11.00 Million | $1.20 Million | — |