Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 52.2% as of September 2025. Strategic assets (PP&E of $10.45 Million plus long-term investments of $-) total $10.45 Million, measured against net assets of $20.02 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2024)
This chart shows how Chicago Rivet & Machine Co's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 25 annual periods from 2000 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 52.2%, representing strategic assets of $10.45 Million against net assets of $20.02 Million USD. Explore Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (2000–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co from 2000 to 2024, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see Chicago Rivet & Machine Co market capitalisation.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 53.8% | $10.78 Million | $10.78 Million | $- | $20.03 Million | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 2023 | 44.9% | $11.67 Million | $11.67 Million | $- | $25.97 Million | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2022 | 38.3% | $11.86 Million | $11.86 Million | $- | $30.99 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2021 | 43.1% | $12.47 Million | $12.47 Million | $- | $28.97 Million | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2020 | 45.8% | $13.15 Million | $13.15 Million | $- | $28.71 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2019 | 46.9% | $13.67 Million | $13.67 Million | $- | $29.16 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2018 | 44.6% | $13.26 Million | $13.26 Million | $0.00 | $29.76 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2017 | 43.5% | $12.56 Million | $12.56 Million | $0.00 | $28.86 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2016 | 44.6% | $12.45 Million | $12.45 Million | $0.00 | $27.89 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2015 | 44.2% | $11.70 Million | $11.70 Million | $0.00 | $26.49 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2014 | 42.3% | $10.88 Million | $10.88 Million | $- | $25.74 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2013 | 41.9% | $10.41 Million | $10.41 Million | $- | $24.87 Million | ▲ +37.8 pp |
| 2012 | 4.0% | $923.59K | $923.59K | $- | $23.00 Million | ▼ -31.7 pp |
| 2011 | 35.7% | $7.90 Million | $7.90 Million | $- | $22.12 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2010 | 35.0% | $7.48 Million | $7.48 Million | $- | $21.36 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2009 | 36.9% | $7.81 Million | $7.81 Million | $- | $21.16 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2008 | 36.7% | $8.40 Million | $8.40 Million | $- | $22.91 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2007 | 37.1% | $9.11 Million | $9.11 Million | $- | $24.57 Million | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2006 | 41.0% | $9.84 Million | $9.84 Million | $- | $24.00 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2005 | 42.6% | $10.05 Million | $10.05 Million | $- | $23.58 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2004 | 44.9% | $11.15 Million | $11.15 Million | $- | $24.82 Million | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2003 | 48.1% | $11.55 Million | $11.55 Million | $- | $23.99 Million | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2002 | 53.0% | $12.78 Million | $12.78 Million | $- | $24.11 Million | ▼ -8.7 pp |
| 2001 | 61.8% | $13.82 Million | $13.82 Million | $- | $22.37 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2000 | 66.6% | $14.32 Million | $14.32 Million | $- | $21.52 Million | — |