Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co strategic asset allocation index. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 52.2% as of September 2025. Strategic assets (PP&E of $10.45 Million plus long-term investments of $-) total $10.45 Million, measured against net assets of $20.02 Million. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. See how leveraged is Chicago Rivet & Machine Co's balance sheet to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Strategic Asset Allocation Index of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (2000–2024)
Strategic asset allocation index of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co from 2000 to 2024. This chart shows how Chicago Rivet & Machine Co's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 25 annual periods from 2000 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 52.2%, representing strategic assets of $10.45 Million against net assets of $20.02 Million USD. Check Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) tangible net worth to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Strategic Asset Allocation Index by Year (2000–2024)
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co strategic asset allocation index by year from 2000 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co from 2000 to 2024, covering 25 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see CVR market cap.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 53.8% | $10.78 Million | $10.78 Million | $- | $20.03 Million | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 2023 | 44.9% | $11.67 Million | $11.67 Million | $- | $25.97 Million | ▲ +6.6 pp |
| 2022 | 38.3% | $11.86 Million | $11.86 Million | $- | $30.99 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2021 | 43.1% | $12.47 Million | $12.47 Million | $- | $28.97 Million | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2020 | 45.8% | $13.15 Million | $13.15 Million | $- | $28.71 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2019 | 46.9% | $13.67 Million | $13.67 Million | $- | $29.16 Million | ▲ +2.3 pp |
| 2018 | 44.6% | $13.26 Million | $13.26 Million | $0.00 | $29.76 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2017 | 43.5% | $12.56 Million | $12.56 Million | $0.00 | $28.86 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2016 | 44.6% | $12.45 Million | $12.45 Million | $0.00 | $27.89 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2015 | 44.2% | $11.70 Million | $11.70 Million | $0.00 | $26.49 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2014 | 42.3% | $10.88 Million | $10.88 Million | $- | $25.74 Million | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2013 | 41.9% | $10.41 Million | $10.41 Million | $- | $24.87 Million | ▲ +37.8 pp |
| 2012 | 4.0% | $923.59K | $923.59K | $- | $23.00 Million | ▼ -31.7 pp |
| 2011 | 35.7% | $7.90 Million | $7.90 Million | $- | $22.12 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2010 | 35.0% | $7.48 Million | $7.48 Million | $- | $21.36 Million | ▼ -1.9 pp |
| 2009 | 36.9% | $7.81 Million | $7.81 Million | $- | $21.16 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2008 | 36.7% | $8.40 Million | $8.40 Million | $- | $22.91 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2007 | 37.1% | $9.11 Million | $9.11 Million | $- | $24.57 Million | ▼ -3.9 pp |
| 2006 | 41.0% | $9.84 Million | $9.84 Million | $- | $24.00 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2005 | 42.6% | $10.05 Million | $10.05 Million | $- | $23.58 Million | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2004 | 44.9% | $11.15 Million | $11.15 Million | $- | $24.82 Million | ▼ -3.2 pp |
| 2003 | 48.1% | $11.55 Million | $11.55 Million | $- | $23.99 Million | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 2002 | 53.0% | $12.78 Million | $12.78 Million | $- | $24.11 Million | ▼ -8.7 pp |
| 2001 | 61.8% | $13.82 Million | $13.82 Million | $- | $22.37 Million | ▼ -4.8 pp |
| 2000 | 66.6% | $14.32 Million | $14.32 Million | $- | $21.52 Million | — |