Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) — Financial Flexibility Index
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) has a Financial Flexibility Index of 0.20x as of September 2025. Free cash flow of $783.91K (operating CF $637.99K minus capex $145.92K) represents 0% of total liabilities ($4.01 Million). Also explore Chicago Rivet & Machine Co net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Financial Flexibility Index
Free Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Capital Expenditures
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Financial Flexibility Index (1985–2024)
Historical Financial Flexibility Index trend for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co across 35 annual periods. Check Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) strategic investment index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Annual Financial Flexibility Index for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (1985–2024)
Year-by-year free cash flow to debt coverage for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see market cap of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
| Year | Flexibility Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.15x | $497.95K | $-153.45K | $3.34 Million | ▲ +132.6% |
| 2023 | -0.46x | $-853.27K | $-1.93 Million | $1.86 Million | ▼ -309.5% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-295.01K | $-1.26 Million | $2.64 Million | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2021 | -0.12x | $-338.58K | $-1.01 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -121.2% |
| 2020 | 0.57x | $1.45 Million | $623.80K | $2.53 Million | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2019 | 1.94x | $4.97 Million | $3.17 Million | $2.57 Million | ▲ +74.3% |
| 2018 | 1.11x | $3.88 Million | $1.88 Million | $3.49 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2017 | 1.46x | $4.33 Million | $2.99 Million | $2.96 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2016 | 1.83x | $6.06 Million | $4.03 Million | $3.31 Million | ▲ +7.6% |
| 2015 | 1.70x | $6.17 Million | $4.09 Million | $3.63 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2014 | 1.24x | $4.01 Million | $2.36 Million | $3.23 Million | ▼ -37.1% |
| 2013 | 1.98x | $6.50 Million | $3.06 Million | $3.29 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 2012 | 1.33x | $3.87 Million | $2.78 Million | $2.91 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2011 | 0.95x | $2.60 Million | $1.08 Million | $2.73 Million | ▲ +17.8% |
| 2010 | 0.81x | $1.85 Million | $1.18 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +167.3% |
| 2009 | 0.30x | $744.66K | $315.14K | $2.46 Million | ▼ -51.6% |
| 2008 | 0.62x | $1.56 Million | $1.19 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 2007 | 0.97x | $3.24 Million | $2.84 Million | $3.33 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2006 | 0.86x | $3.36 Million | $2.04 Million | $3.90 Million | ▲ +180.1% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $1.34 Million | $693.15K | $4.34 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2004 | 0.82x | $3.66 Million | $2.32 Million | $4.48 Million | ▼ -23.8% |
| 2003 | 1.07x | $4.45 Million | $3.81 Million | $4.15 Million | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2002 | 0.82x | $4.89 Million | $4.01 Million | $5.98 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2001 | 0.92x | $6.72 Million | $5.29 Million | $7.31 Million | ▲ +28.5% |
| 2000 | 0.72x | $6.90 Million | $4.77 Million | $9.64 Million | ▼ -11.0% |
| 1999 | 0.80x | $7.00 Million | $5.30 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +33.6% |
| 1998 | 0.60x | $5.90 Million | $3.20 Million | $9.80 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 1997 | 0.57x | $7.10 Million | $6.10 Million | $12.40 Million | ▲ +108.9% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $3.70 Million | $2.80 Million | $13.50 Million | ▼ -69.2% |
| 1995 | 0.89x | $4.00 Million | $3.80 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +49.3% |
| 1994 | 0.60x | $2.50 Million | $2.10 Million | $4.20 Million | ▼ -17.1% |
| 1993 | 0.72x | $2.80 Million | $1.70 Million | $3.90 Million | ▲ +7.7% |
| 1992 | 0.67x | $1.80 Million | $1.10 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -25.0% |
| 1991 | 0.89x | $2.40 Million | $1.60 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -65.3% |
| 1985 | 2.56x | $11.00 Million | $11.00 Million | $4.30 Million | — |