Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.16x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $637.99K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.01 Million) in one year. See CVR free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co across 35 annual periods. Also explore CVR net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (1985–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CVR company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.05x | $-153.45K | $3.34 Million | ▲ +95.6% |
| 2023 | -1.04x | $-1.93 Million | $1.86 Million | ▼ -116.2% |
| 2022 | -0.48x | $-1.26 Million | $2.64 Million | ▼ -32.8% |
| 2021 | -0.36x | $-1.01 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -246.5% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $623.80K | $2.53 Million | ▼ -80.1% |
| 2019 | 1.24x | $3.17 Million | $2.57 Million | ▲ +129.2% |
| 2018 | 0.54x | $1.88 Million | $3.49 Million | ▼ -46.7% |
| 2017 | 1.01x | $2.99 Million | $2.96 Million | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2016 | 1.22x | $4.03 Million | $3.31 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2015 | 1.13x | $4.09 Million | $3.63 Million | ▲ +54.1% |
| 2014 | 0.73x | $2.36 Million | $3.23 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2013 | 0.93x | $3.06 Million | $3.29 Million | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2012 | 0.95x | $2.78 Million | $2.91 Million | ▲ +142.2% |
| 2011 | 0.39x | $1.08 Million | $2.73 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2010 | 0.51x | $1.18 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +301.7% |
| 2009 | 0.13x | $315.14K | $2.46 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 2008 | 0.48x | $1.19 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -44.2% |
| 2007 | 0.85x | $2.84 Million | $3.33 Million | ▲ +63.1% |
| 2006 | 0.52x | $2.04 Million | $3.90 Million | ▲ +227.0% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $693.15K | $4.34 Million | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2004 | 0.52x | $2.32 Million | $4.48 Million | ▼ -43.6% |
| 2003 | 0.92x | $3.81 Million | $4.15 Million | ▲ +37.0% |
| 2002 | 0.67x | $4.01 Million | $5.98 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2001 | 0.72x | $5.29 Million | $7.31 Million | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2000 | 0.50x | $4.77 Million | $9.64 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 1999 | 0.61x | $5.30 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 1998 | 0.33x | $3.20 Million | $9.80 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 1997 | 0.49x | $6.10 Million | $12.40 Million | ▲ +137.2% |
| 1996 | 0.21x | $2.80 Million | $13.50 Million | ▼ -75.4% |
| 1995 | 0.84x | $3.80 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +68.9% |
| 1994 | 0.50x | $2.10 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 1993 | 0.44x | $1.70 Million | $3.90 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 1992 | 0.41x | $1.10 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 1991 | 0.59x | $1.60 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 1985 | 2.56x | $11.00 Million | $4.30 Million | — |