Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Net Asset Quality Index
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co net asset quality index. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 83.3% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $24.03 Million minus total liabilities of $4.01 Million yields net assets of $20.02 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check earnings quality score of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (1985–2024)
Net asset quality index of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co from 1985 to 2024. This chart shows how Chicago Rivet & Machine Co's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 40 annual periods from 1985 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 83.3%, representing net assets of $20.02 Million against total assets of $24.03 Million USD. See CVR net assets for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Net Asset Quality Index by Year (1985–2024)
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co net asset quality index by year from 1985 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co from 1985 to 2024, covering 40 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) total market value.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 85.7% | $20.03 Million | $23.37 Million | $3.34 Million | ▼ -7.6 pp |
| 2023 | 93.3% | $25.97 Million | $27.83 Million | $1.86 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2022 | 92.2% | $30.99 Million | $33.63 Million | $2.64 Million | ▲ +1.0 pp |
| 2021 | 91.2% | $28.97 Million | $31.77 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2020 | 91.9% | $28.71 Million | $31.24 Million | $2.53 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 91.9% | $29.16 Million | $31.72 Million | $2.57 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2018 | 89.5% | $29.76 Million | $33.25 Million | $3.49 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2017 | 90.7% | $28.86 Million | $31.82 Million | $2.96 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2016 | 89.4% | $27.89 Million | $31.20 Million | $3.31 Million | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2015 | 87.9% | $26.49 Million | $30.12 Million | $3.63 Million | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2014 | 88.9% | $25.74 Million | $28.97 Million | $3.23 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2013 | 88.3% | $24.87 Million | $28.16 Million | $3.29 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2012 | 88.8% | $23.00 Million | $25.91 Million | $2.91 Million | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2011 | 89.0% | $22.12 Million | $24.86 Million | $2.73 Million | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2010 | 90.3% | $21.36 Million | $23.66 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +0.7 pp |
| 2009 | 89.6% | $21.16 Million | $23.63 Million | $2.46 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2008 | 90.2% | $22.91 Million | $25.41 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 2007 | 88.1% | $24.57 Million | $27.91 Million | $3.33 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2006 | 86.0% | $24.00 Million | $27.91 Million | $3.90 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2005 | 84.4% | $23.58 Million | $27.92 Million | $4.34 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 2004 | 84.7% | $24.82 Million | $29.30 Million | $4.48 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2003 | 85.3% | $23.99 Million | $28.14 Million | $4.15 Million | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 2002 | 80.1% | $24.11 Million | $30.09 Million | $5.98 Million | ▲ +4.7 pp |
| 2001 | 75.4% | $22.37 Million | $29.68 Million | $7.31 Million | ▲ +6.3 pp |
| 2000 | 69.1% | $21.52 Million | $31.16 Million | $9.64 Million | ▼ -4.2 pp |
| 1999 | 73.3% | $23.90 Million | $32.60 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +4.1 pp |
| 1998 | 69.2% | $22.00 Million | $31.80 Million | $9.80 Million | ▲ +6.9 pp |
| 1997 | 62.3% | $20.50 Million | $32.90 Million | $12.40 Million | ▲ +5.4 pp |
| 1996 | 56.9% | $17.80 Million | $31.30 Million | $13.50 Million | ▼ -22.1 pp |
| 1995 | 79.0% | $16.90 Million | $21.40 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 1994 | 78.9% | $15.70 Million | $19.90 Million | $4.20 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 1993 | 79.0% | $14.70 Million | $18.60 Million | $3.90 Million | ▼ -4.9 pp |
| 1992 | 83.9% | $14.10 Million | $16.80 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 1991 | 83.6% | $13.80 Million | $16.50 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 1990 | 85.5% | $14.70 Million | $17.20 Million | $2.50 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 1989 | 83.7% | $14.90 Million | $17.80 Million | $2.90 Million | ▼ -2.7 pp |
| 1988 | 86.4% | $15.90 Million | $18.40 Million | $2.50 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 1987 | 86.7% | $15.60 Million | $18.00 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 1986 | 84.8% | $16.20 Million | $19.10 Million | $2.90 Million | ▲ +5.5 pp |
| 1985 | 79.3% | $16.50 Million | $20.80 Million | $4.30 Million | — |