Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co working capital to net assets ratio. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (CVR) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 56.3% as of September 2025. Working capital of $11.27 Million (current assets of $13.54 Million minus current liabilities of $2.27 Million) is measured against net assets of $20.02 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check Chicago Rivet & Machine Co tangible net worth ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co (1985–2024)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co from 1985 to 2024. This chart shows how Chicago Rivet & Machine Co's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 40 annual periods from 1985 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 56.3%, reflecting working capital of $11.27 Million against net assets of $20.02 Million USD. See Chicago Rivet & Machine Co defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (1985–2024)
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co working capital to net assets ratio by year from 1985 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co from 1985 to 2024, covering 40 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see balance sheet size of Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 51.8% | $10.37 Million | $20.03 Million | $12.59 Million | $2.22 Million | ▼ -2.1 pp |
| 2023 | 53.8% | $13.98 Million | $25.97 Million | $15.84 Million | $1.86 Million | ▼ -11.0 pp |
| 2022 | 64.8% | $20.07 Million | $30.99 Million | $21.76 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +4.6 pp |
| 2021 | 60.1% | $17.42 Million | $28.97 Million | $19.29 Million | $1.87 Million | ▲ +2.4 pp |
| 2020 | 57.7% | $16.57 Million | $28.71 Million | $18.09 Million | $1.52 Million | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2019 | 56.3% | $16.43 Million | $29.16 Million | $18.05 Million | $1.62 Million | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2018 | 58.5% | $17.42 Million | $29.76 Million | $19.99 Million | $2.57 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2017 | 59.0% | $17.04 Million | $28.86 Million | $19.26 Million | $2.22 Million | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 59.0% | $16.47 Million | $27.89 Million | $18.75 Million | $2.28 Million | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 2015 | 60.8% | $16.11 Million | $26.49 Million | $18.42 Million | $2.31 Million | ▼ -1.2 pp |
| 2014 | 62.0% | $15.97 Million | $25.74 Million | $18.09 Million | $2.12 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2013 | 62.4% | $15.53 Million | $24.87 Million | $17.75 Million | $2.22 Million | ▼ -6.6 pp |
| 2012 | 69.0% | $15.88 Million | $23.00 Million | $17.83 Million | $1.96 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2011 | 67.9% | $15.01 Million | $22.12 Million | $16.96 Million | $1.95 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2010 | 68.5% | $14.63 Million | $21.36 Million | $16.18 Million | $1.55 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2009 | 66.6% | $14.09 Million | $21.16 Million | $15.82 Million | $1.73 Million | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2008 | 67.1% | $15.37 Million | $22.91 Million | $17.01 Million | $1.64 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2007 | 67.0% | $16.45 Million | $24.57 Million | $18.80 Million | $2.35 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2006 | 63.5% | $15.24 Million | $24.00 Million | $18.07 Million | $2.83 Million | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2005 | 62.9% | $14.84 Million | $23.58 Million | $17.87 Million | $3.03 Million | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2004 | 61.3% | $15.22 Million | $24.82 Million | $18.15 Million | $2.93 Million | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 2003 | 58.4% | $14.02 Million | $23.99 Million | $16.59 Million | $2.57 Million | ▲ +5.0 pp |
| 2002 | 53.4% | $12.87 Million | $24.11 Million | $17.31 Million | $4.43 Million | ▲ +1.5 pp |
| 2001 | 51.9% | $11.62 Million | $22.37 Million | $15.86 Million | $4.24 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2000 | 55.8% | $12.00 Million | $21.52 Million | $16.83 Million | $4.83 Million | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 1999 | 51.9% | $12.40 Million | $23.90 Million | $18.50 Million | $6.10 Million | ▼ -4.5 pp |
| 1998 | 56.4% | $12.40 Million | $22.00 Million | $17.70 Million | $5.30 Million | ▼ -11.0 pp |
| 1997 | 67.3% | $13.80 Million | $20.50 Million | $20.00 Million | $6.20 Million | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 1996 | 67.4% | $12.00 Million | $17.80 Million | $17.30 Million | $5.30 Million | ▼ -7.7 pp |
| 1995 | 75.1% | $12.70 Million | $16.90 Million | $16.10 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +5.1 pp |
| 1994 | 70.1% | $11.00 Million | $15.70 Million | $14.20 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +6.1 pp |
| 1993 | 63.9% | $9.40 Million | $14.70 Million | $12.40 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -9.1 pp |
| 1992 | 73.0% | $10.30 Million | $14.10 Million | $12.10 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 1991 | 71.7% | $9.90 Million | $13.80 Million | $11.80 Million | $1.90 Million | ▼ -2.4 pp |
| 1990 | 74.1% | $10.90 Million | $14.70 Million | $12.60 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -0.3 pp |
| 1989 | 74.5% | $11.10 Million | $14.90 Million | $13.30 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -4.1 pp |
| 1988 | 78.6% | $12.50 Million | $15.90 Million | $14.30 Million | $1.80 Million | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 1987 | 77.6% | $12.10 Million | $15.60 Million | $13.80 Million | $1.70 Million | ▲ +9.7 pp |
| 1986 | 67.9% | $11.00 Million | $16.20 Million | $13.20 Million | $2.20 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 1985 | 70.9% | $11.70 Million | $16.50 Million | $14.20 Million | $2.50 Million | — |