Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS capital reinvestment ratio. Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (TKC) has a Capital Reinvestment Ratio of 0.31x as of September 2025, meaning it reinvests 0% of its operating cash flow ($784.01 Million) in capital expenditures ($240.23 Million). Check TKC total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Capital Reinvestment Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Capital Expenditures
Data as of
Capital Reinvestment Ratio of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (1999–2024)
Capital reinvestment ratio of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS from 1999 to 2024. This chart tracks Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS's Capital Reinvestment Ratio across 26 annual periods. Also explore Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS Capital Reinvestment Ratio by Year (1999–2024)
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS capital reinvestment ratio by year from 1999 to 2024. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TKC cash flow conversion.
| Year | Reinvestment Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Capital Expenditures | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.41x | $75.01 Billion | $30.70 Billion | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2023 | 0.71x | $60.24 Billion | $42.60 Billion | ▲ +26.3% |
| 2022 | 0.56x | $25.15 Billion | $14.09 Billion | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2021 | 0.50x | $19.95 Billion | $9.88 Billion | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2020 | 0.59x | $13.09 Billion | $7.78 Billion | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2019 | 0.67x | $9.03 Billion | $6.02 Billion | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2018 | 0.93x | $5.83 Billion | $5.43 Billion | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2017 | 1.33x | $3.10 Billion | $4.11 Billion | ▼ -77.9% |
| 2016 | 5.99x | $607.14 Million | $3.64 Billion | ▲ +147.8% |
| 2015 | 2.42x | $1.90 Billion | $4.60 Billion | ▲ +88.4% |
| 2014 | 1.28x | $1.87 Billion | $2.39 Billion | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2013 | 0.85x | $2.11 Billion | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2012 | 0.81x | $2.13 Billion | $1.73 Billion | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2011 | 0.93x | $1.75 Billion | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2010 | 0.81x | $2.00 Billion | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2009 | 1.37x | $1.94 Billion | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +186.9% |
| 2008 | 0.48x | $2.57 Billion | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +32.9% |
| 2007 | 0.36x | $2.52 Billion | $903.04 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | $2.62 Billion | $852.77 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2005 | 0.56x | $1.54 Billion | $866.79 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2004 | 0.51x | $805.93 Million | $412.66 Million | ▲ +420.7% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $1.39 Billion | $136.65 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | $812.50 Million | $112.57 Million | ▼ -82.0% |
| 2001 | 0.77x | $385.27 Million | $296.23 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 2000 | 2.37x | $463.91 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +15.7% |
| 1999 | 2.05x | $517.75 Million | $1.06 Billion | — |