Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (TKC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (TKC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $784.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($248.39 Billion) in one year. See TKC free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS across 26 annual periods. Also explore TKC net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (1999–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.48x | $75.01 Billion | $157.31 Billion | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2023 | 0.33x | $60.24 Billion | $180.25 Billion | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $25.15 Billion | $125.61 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $19.95 Billion | $85.93 Billion | ▼ -92.4% |
| 2020 | 3.04x | $13.09 Billion | $4.31 Billion | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2019 | 1.94x | $9.03 Billion | $4.64 Billion | ▲ +790.7% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $5.83 Billion | $26.71 Billion | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $3.10 Billion | $18.94 Billion | ▲ +318.9% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $607.14 Million | $15.53 Billion | ▼ -75.8% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $1.90 Billion | $11.79 Billion | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | $1.87 Billion | $7.01 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | $2.11 Billion | $6.52 Billion | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2012 | 0.36x | $2.13 Billion | $5.95 Billion | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $1.75 Billion | $6.35 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $2.00 Billion | $5.54 Billion | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $1.94 Billion | $5.13 Billion | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2008 | 0.64x | $2.57 Billion | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2007 | 0.85x | $2.52 Billion | $2.97 Billion | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2006 | 0.94x | $2.62 Billion | $2.78 Billion | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | $1.54 Billion | $2.19 Billion | ▲ +169.2% |
| 2004 | 0.26x | $805.93 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2003 | 0.45x | $1.39 Billion | $3.09 Billion | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2002 | 0.32x | $812.50 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▲ +149.4% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $385.27 Million | $3.00 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $463.91 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▼ -29.9% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | $517.75 Million | $2.71 Billion | — |