Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS cash flow-to-debt ratio. Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (TKC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $784.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($248.39 Billion) in one year. Check Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (TKC) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (1999–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS from 1999 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS across 26 annual periods. Check TKC cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2024)
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TKC cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.48x | $75.01 Billion | $157.31 Billion | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2023 | 0.33x | $60.24 Billion | $180.25 Billion | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $25.15 Billion | $125.61 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $19.95 Billion | $85.93 Billion | ▼ -92.4% |
| 2020 | 3.04x | $13.09 Billion | $4.31 Billion | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2019 | 1.94x | $9.03 Billion | $4.64 Billion | ▲ +790.7% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $5.83 Billion | $26.71 Billion | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $3.10 Billion | $18.94 Billion | ▲ +318.9% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $607.14 Million | $15.53 Billion | ▼ -75.8% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $1.90 Billion | $11.79 Billion | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | $1.87 Billion | $7.01 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | $2.11 Billion | $6.52 Billion | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2012 | 0.36x | $2.13 Billion | $5.95 Billion | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $1.75 Billion | $6.35 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $2.00 Billion | $5.54 Billion | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $1.94 Billion | $5.13 Billion | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2008 | 0.64x | $2.57 Billion | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2007 | 0.85x | $2.52 Billion | $2.97 Billion | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2006 | 0.94x | $2.62 Billion | $2.78 Billion | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | $1.54 Billion | $2.19 Billion | ▲ +169.2% |
| 2004 | 0.26x | $805.93 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2003 | 0.45x | $1.39 Billion | $3.09 Billion | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2002 | 0.32x | $812.50 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▲ +149.4% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $385.27 Million | $3.00 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $463.91 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▼ -29.9% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | $517.75 Million | $2.71 Billion | — |