Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (TKC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (TKC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $784.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($248.39 Billion) in one year. See TKC FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS across 26 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (TKC) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (1999–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS. Check TKC operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.48x | $75.01 Billion | $157.31 Billion | ▲ +42.7% |
| 2023 | 0.33x | $60.24 Billion | $180.25 Billion | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $25.15 Billion | $125.61 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $19.95 Billion | $85.93 Billion | ▼ -92.4% |
| 2020 | 3.04x | $13.09 Billion | $4.31 Billion | ▲ +56.1% |
| 2019 | 1.94x | $9.03 Billion | $4.64 Billion | ▲ +790.7% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $5.83 Billion | $26.71 Billion | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $3.10 Billion | $18.94 Billion | ▲ +318.9% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $607.14 Million | $15.53 Billion | ▼ -75.8% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $1.90 Billion | $11.79 Billion | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | $1.87 Billion | $7.01 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | $2.11 Billion | $6.52 Billion | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2012 | 0.36x | $2.13 Billion | $5.95 Billion | ▲ +30.0% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $1.75 Billion | $6.35 Billion | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $2.00 Billion | $5.54 Billion | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $1.94 Billion | $5.13 Billion | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2008 | 0.64x | $2.57 Billion | $4.03 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2007 | 0.85x | $2.52 Billion | $2.97 Billion | ▼ -9.7% |
| 2006 | 0.94x | $2.62 Billion | $2.78 Billion | ▲ +33.8% |
| 2005 | 0.70x | $1.54 Billion | $2.19 Billion | ▲ +169.2% |
| 2004 | 0.26x | $805.93 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2003 | 0.45x | $1.39 Billion | $3.09 Billion | ▲ +40.3% |
| 2002 | 0.32x | $812.50 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▲ +149.4% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $385.27 Million | $3.00 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $463.91 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▼ -29.9% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | $517.75 Million | $2.71 Billion | — |