Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS Cash Flow Quality Index
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS cash flow quality index. Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (TKC) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 5.94x as of September 2025. Operating cash flow of $784.01 Million exceeds net income of $131.96 Million, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. See financial agility of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (1999–2024)
Cash flow quality index of Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS from 1999 to 2024. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS across 25 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore TKC cash flow to debt ratio to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1999–2024)
Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS cash flow quality index by year from 1999 to 2024. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri AS (TKC) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3.19x | $75.01 Billion | $23.51 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2023 | 3.33x | $60.24 Billion | $18.09 Billion | ▲ +46.3% |
| 2022 | 2.28x | $25.15 Billion | $11.05 Billion | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2021 | 3.96x | $19.95 Billion | $5.03 Billion | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2020 | 3.09x | $13.09 Billion | $4.24 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2019 | 2.75x | $9.03 Billion | $3.28 Billion | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2018 | 2.68x | $5.83 Billion | $2.18 Billion | ▲ +75.9% |
| 2017 | 1.52x | $3.10 Billion | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +297.6% |
| 2016 | 0.38x | $607.14 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -61.7% |
| 2015 | 1.00x | $1.90 Billion | $1.90 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2014 | 1.20x | $1.87 Billion | $1.56 Billion | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2013 | 0.81x | $2.11 Billion | $2.61 Billion | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2012 | 1.04x | $2.13 Billion | $2.06 Billion | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2011 | 1.28x | $1.75 Billion | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2010 | 1.14x | $2.00 Billion | $1.75 Billion | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2009 | 1.17x | $1.94 Billion | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +22.9% |
| 2008 | 0.95x | $2.57 Billion | $2.70 Billion | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2007 | 1.63x | $2.52 Billion | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2006 | 2.23x | $2.62 Billion | $1.17 Billion | ▲ +77.5% |
| 2005 | 1.25x | $1.54 Billion | $1.23 Billion | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2004 | 1.18x | $805.93 Million | $683.02 Million | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2003 | 4.84x | $1.39 Billion | $287.14 Million | ▼ -62.3% |
| 2002 | 12.85x | $812.50 Million | $63.22 Million | ▲ +742.5% |
| 2000 | 1.53x | $463.91 Million | $304.14 Million | ▲ +45.1% |
| 1999 | 1.05x | $517.75 Million | $492.53 Million | — |