Eastman Kodak Co Cash Flow Quality Index
Eastman Kodak Co cash flow quality index. Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of -25.00x as of June 2026. Operating cash flow of $-25.00 Million is below net income of $1.00 Million, suggesting accrual-heavy earnings not yet converted to cash. See KODK financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Cash Flow Quality Index of Eastman Kodak Co (1985–2024)
Cash flow quality index of Eastman Kodak Co from 1985 to 2024. Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Eastman Kodak Co across 28 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Explore how well can Eastman Kodak Co service its debt to assess how comfortably operating cash covers total debt obligations.
Eastman Kodak Co Cash Flow Quality Index by Year (1985–2024)
Eastman Kodak Co cash flow quality index by year from 1985 to 2024. Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Eastman Kodak Co. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) cash flow conversion.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.07x | $-7.00 Million | $102.00 Million | ▼ -113.5% |
| 2023 | 0.51x | $38.00 Million | $75.00 Million | ▲ +111.4% |
| 2022 | -4.46x | $-116.00 Million | $26.00 Million | ▼ -127.8% |
| 2021 | -1.96x | $-47.00 Million | $24.00 Million | ▼ -1993.1% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $12.00 Million | $116.00 Million | ▲ +114.5% |
| 2017 | -0.71x | $-67.00 Million | $94.00 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2016 | -0.81x | $-13.00 Million | $16.00 Million | ▼ -141.8% |
| 2013 | -0.34x | $-667.00 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▼ -172.3% |
| 2007 | 0.46x | $314.00 Million | $676.00 Million | ▼ -77.9% |
| 2004 | 2.10x | $1.17 Billion | $556.00 Million | ▼ -66.2% |
| 2003 | 6.21x | $1.65 Billion | $265.00 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 2002 | 2.86x | $2.20 Billion | $770.00 Million | ▼ -89.5% |
| 2001 | 27.17x | $2.06 Billion | $76.00 Million | ▲ +3793.0% |
| 2000 | 0.70x | $982.00 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -49.7% |
| 1999 | 1.39x | $1.93 Billion | $1.39 Billion | ▲ +30.2% |
| 1998 | 1.07x | $1.48 Billion | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -99.7% |
| 1997 | 416.00x | $2.08 Billion | $5.00 Million | ▲ +21470.4% |
| 1996 | 1.93x | $2.48 Billion | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -8.2% |
| 1995 | 2.10x | $2.63 Billion | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +5.3% |
| 1994 | 2.00x | $1.64 Billion | $823.00 Million | ▼ -49.1% |
| 1993 | 3.92x | $2.61 Billion | $667.00 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 1992 | 3.39x | $3.37 Billion | $994.00 Million | ▼ -97.7% |
| 1991 | 150.41x | $2.56 Billion | $17.00 Million | ▲ +4112.7% |
| 1990 | 3.57x | $2.51 Billion | $703.00 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 1989 | 4.95x | $2.62 Billion | $529.00 Million | ▲ +395.1% |
| 1988 | 1.00x | $1.40 Billion | $1.40 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1986 | 1.00x | $374.00 Million | $374.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1985 | 1.00x | $332.00 Million | $332.00 Million | — |