Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) — Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 16.6% as of September 2023. Strategic assets (PP&E of $194.00 Million plus long-term investments of $-) total $194.00 Million, measured against net assets of $1.17 Billion. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. See how leveraged is Eastman Kodak Co's balance sheet to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Eastman Kodak Co Strategic Asset Allocation Index (2000–2022)
This chart shows how Eastman Kodak Co's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2000 to 2022. As of September 2023, the index stands at 16.6%, representing strategic assets of $194.00 Million against net assets of $1.17 Billion USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Eastman Kodak Co stock valuation.
Annual Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Eastman Kodak Co (2000–2022)
The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Eastman Kodak Co from 2000 to 2022, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. See KODK net asset value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 17.5% | $218.00 Million | $193.00 Million | $25.00 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2021 | 14.3% | $140.00 Million | $140.00 Million | $0.00 | $977.00 Million | ▼ -60.3 pp |
| 2020 | 74.6% | $200.00 Million | $200.00 Million | $- | $268.00 Million | ▲ +10.2 pp |
| 2019 | 64.4% | $181.00 Million | $181.00 Million | $- | $281.00 Million | ▼ -80.3 pp |
| 2018 | 144.7% | $246.00 Million | $246.00 Million | $- | $170.00 Million | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2017 | 142.1% | $314.00 Million | $314.00 Million | $- | $221.00 Million | ▼ -217.0 pp |
| 2016 | 359.0% | $298.00 Million | $298.00 Million | $- | $83.00 Million | ▼ -54.6 pp |
| 2015 | 413.6% | $426.00 Million | $426.00 Million | $- | $103.00 Million | ▲ +238.3 pp |
| 2014 | 175.3% | $524.00 Million | $524.00 Million | $- | $299.00 Million | ▲ +69.7 pp |
| 2013 | 105.6% | $684.00 Million | $684.00 Million | $- | $648.00 Million | ▼ -55.8 pp |
| 2008 | 161.4% | $1.55 Billion | $1.55 Billion | $- | $961.00 Million | ▲ +101.6 pp |
| 2007 | 59.8% | $1.81 Billion | $1.81 Billion | $- | $3.03 Billion | ▼ -141.9 pp |
| 2006 | 201.7% | $2.84 Billion | $2.84 Billion | $- | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +9.6 pp |
| 2005 | 192.1% | $3.78 Billion | $3.78 Billion | $- | $1.97 Billion | ▲ +73.7 pp |
| 2004 | 118.4% | $4.51 Billion | $4.51 Billion | $- | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -37.7 pp |
| 2003 | 156.1% | $5.09 Billion | $5.09 Billion | $- | $3.26 Billion | ▼ -39.1 pp |
| 2002 | 195.2% | $5.42 Billion | $5.42 Billion | $- | $2.78 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2001 | 195.5% | $5.66 Billion | $5.66 Billion | $- | $2.89 Billion | ▲ +22.9 pp |
| 2000 | 172.7% | $5.92 Billion | $5.92 Billion | $- | $3.43 Billion | — |