Eastman Kodak Co Strategic Asset Allocation Index
Eastman Kodak Co strategic asset allocation index. Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) has a Strategic Asset Allocation Index of 16.6% as of September 2023. Strategic assets (PP&E of $194.00 Million plus long-term investments of $-) total $194.00 Million, measured against net assets of $1.17 Billion. A higher index reflects capital-intensive or investment-heavy strategies where strategic assets dominate the equity base. See debt-free asset ratio of Eastman Kodak Co to measure how much of total assets are equity-financed.
SAAI
Strategic Assets
PP&E
Net Assets
Strategic Asset Allocation Index of Eastman Kodak Co (2000–2022)
Strategic asset allocation index of Eastman Kodak Co from 2000 to 2022. This chart shows how Eastman Kodak Co's Strategic Asset Allocation Index has evolved across 19 annual periods from 2000 to 2022. As of September 2023, the index stands at 16.6%, representing strategic assets of $194.00 Million against net assets of $1.17 Billion USD. Check Eastman Kodak Co tangible book value ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Eastman Kodak Co Strategic Asset Allocation Index by Year (2000–2022)
Eastman Kodak Co strategic asset allocation index by year from 2000 to 2022. The table below presents the year-by-year Strategic Asset Allocation Index for Eastman Kodak Co from 2000 to 2022, covering 19 annual filings. Each row shows PP&E, long-term investments, strategic assets combined, net assets, the index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see KODK stock market capitalisation.
| Year | SAAI | Strategic Assets (USD) | PP&E | LT Investments | Net Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 17.5% | $218.00 Million | $193.00 Million | $25.00 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▲ +3.2 pp |
| 2021 | 14.3% | $140.00 Million | $140.00 Million | $0.00 | $977.00 Million | ▼ -60.3 pp |
| 2020 | 74.6% | $200.00 Million | $200.00 Million | $- | $268.00 Million | ▲ +10.2 pp |
| 2019 | 64.4% | $181.00 Million | $181.00 Million | $- | $281.00 Million | ▼ -80.3 pp |
| 2018 | 144.7% | $246.00 Million | $246.00 Million | $- | $170.00 Million | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2017 | 142.1% | $314.00 Million | $314.00 Million | $- | $221.00 Million | ▼ -217.0 pp |
| 2016 | 359.0% | $298.00 Million | $298.00 Million | $- | $83.00 Million | ▼ -54.6 pp |
| 2015 | 413.6% | $426.00 Million | $426.00 Million | $- | $103.00 Million | ▲ +238.3 pp |
| 2014 | 175.3% | $524.00 Million | $524.00 Million | $- | $299.00 Million | ▲ +69.7 pp |
| 2013 | 105.6% | $684.00 Million | $684.00 Million | $- | $648.00 Million | ▼ -55.8 pp |
| 2008 | 161.4% | $1.55 Billion | $1.55 Billion | $- | $961.00 Million | ▲ +101.6 pp |
| 2007 | 59.8% | $1.81 Billion | $1.81 Billion | $- | $3.03 Billion | ▼ -141.9 pp |
| 2006 | 201.7% | $2.84 Billion | $2.84 Billion | $- | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +9.6 pp |
| 2005 | 192.1% | $3.78 Billion | $3.78 Billion | $- | $1.97 Billion | ▲ +73.7 pp |
| 2004 | 118.4% | $4.51 Billion | $4.51 Billion | $- | $3.81 Billion | ▼ -37.7 pp |
| 2003 | 156.1% | $5.09 Billion | $5.09 Billion | $- | $3.26 Billion | ▼ -39.1 pp |
| 2002 | 195.2% | $5.42 Billion | $5.42 Billion | $- | $2.78 Billion | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2001 | 195.5% | $5.66 Billion | $5.66 Billion | $- | $2.89 Billion | ▲ +22.9 pp |
| 2000 | 172.7% | $5.92 Billion | $5.92 Billion | $- | $3.43 Billion | — |