Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $21.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.21 Billion) in one year. Explore Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Eastman Kodak Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Eastman Kodak Co across 39 annual periods. Also explore Eastman Kodak Co balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Eastman Kodak Co (1985–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eastman Kodak Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Eastman Kodak Co.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.01x | $-7.00 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -119.6% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $38.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +128.1% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-116.00 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -183.1% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-47.00 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2020 | -0.04x | $-35.00 Million | $980.00 Million | ▼ -437.5% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $12.00 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▲ +122.9% |
| 2018 | -0.05x | $-62.00 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2017 | -0.05x | $-67.00 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -487.2% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-13.00 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-95.00 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-128.00 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-667.00 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▼ -694.4% |
| 2012 | -0.03x | $-262.00 Million | $7.96 Billion | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2011 | -0.14x | $-998.00 Million | $7.03 Billion | ▼ -376.1% |
| 2010 | -0.03x | $-219.00 Million | $7.34 Billion | ▼ -69.4% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | $-136.00 Million | $7.72 Billion | ▼ -194.6% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $153.00 Million | $8.22 Billion | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $314.00 Million | $10.63 Billion | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $956.00 Million | $12.91 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $1.21 Billion | $12.95 Billion | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $1.17 Billion | $10.93 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $1.65 Billion | $11.55 Billion | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $2.20 Billion | $10.59 Billion | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $2.06 Billion | $10.47 Billion | ▲ +116.6% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $982.00 Million | $10.78 Billion | ▼ -50.7% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $1.93 Billion | $10.46 Billion | ▲ +33.9% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $1.48 Billion | $10.74 Billion | ▼ -33.8% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $2.08 Billion | $9.98 Billion | ▼ -18.6% |
| 1996 | 0.26x | $2.48 Billion | $9.70 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 1995 | 0.28x | $2.63 Billion | $9.36 Billion | ▲ +87.5% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $1.64 Billion | $10.95 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 1993 | 0.15x | $2.61 Billion | $16.97 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $3.37 Billion | $16.58 Billion | ▲ +43.4% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $2.56 Billion | $18.07 Billion | ▼ -2.0% |
| 1990 | 0.14x | $2.51 Billion | $17.39 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 1989 | 0.15x | $2.62 Billion | $17.01 Billion | ▲ +78.4% |
| 1988 | 0.09x | $1.40 Billion | $16.18 Billion | ▲ +50.3% |
| 1986 | 0.06x | $374.00 Million | $6.51 Billion | ▼ -3.5% |
| 1985 | 0.06x | $332.00 Million | $5.58 Billion | — |