Eastman Kodak Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eastman Kodak Co cash flow-to-debt ratio. Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-25.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($830.00 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Eastman Kodak Co to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Eastman Kodak Co (1985–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Eastman Kodak Co from 1985 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Eastman Kodak Co across 40 annual periods. Check KODK cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Eastman Kodak Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1985–2025)
Eastman Kodak Co cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1985 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eastman Kodak Co. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KODK cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.51x | $480.00 Million | $944.00 Million | ▲ +8395.4% |
| 2024 | -0.01x | $-7.00 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -119.6% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $38.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +128.1% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-116.00 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -183.1% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-47.00 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2020 | -0.04x | $-35.00 Million | $980.00 Million | ▼ -437.5% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $12.00 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▲ +122.9% |
| 2018 | -0.05x | $-62.00 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2017 | -0.05x | $-67.00 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -487.2% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-13.00 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-95.00 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-128.00 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-667.00 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▼ -694.4% |
| 2012 | -0.03x | $-262.00 Million | $7.96 Billion | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2011 | -0.14x | $-998.00 Million | $7.03 Billion | ▼ -376.1% |
| 2010 | -0.03x | $-219.00 Million | $7.34 Billion | ▼ -69.4% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | $-136.00 Million | $7.72 Billion | ▼ -194.6% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $153.00 Million | $8.22 Billion | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $314.00 Million | $10.63 Billion | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $956.00 Million | $12.91 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $1.21 Billion | $12.95 Billion | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $1.17 Billion | $10.93 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $1.65 Billion | $11.55 Billion | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $2.20 Billion | $10.59 Billion | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $2.06 Billion | $10.47 Billion | ▲ +116.6% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $982.00 Million | $10.78 Billion | ▼ -50.7% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $1.93 Billion | $10.46 Billion | ▲ +33.9% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $1.48 Billion | $10.74 Billion | ▼ -33.8% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $2.08 Billion | $9.98 Billion | ▼ -18.6% |
| 1996 | 0.26x | $2.48 Billion | $9.70 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 1995 | 0.28x | $2.63 Billion | $9.36 Billion | ▲ +87.5% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $1.64 Billion | $10.95 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 1993 | 0.15x | $2.61 Billion | $16.97 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $3.37 Billion | $16.58 Billion | ▲ +43.4% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $2.56 Billion | $18.07 Billion | ▼ -2.0% |
| 1990 | 0.14x | $2.51 Billion | $17.39 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 1989 | 0.15x | $2.62 Billion | $17.01 Billion | ▲ +78.4% |
| 1988 | 0.09x | $1.40 Billion | $16.18 Billion | ▲ +50.3% |
| 1986 | 0.06x | $374.00 Million | $6.51 Billion | ▼ -3.5% |
| 1985 | 0.06x | $332.00 Million | $5.58 Billion | — |