Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $21.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.21 Billion) in one year. See KODK cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Eastman Kodak Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Eastman Kodak Co across 39 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Eastman Kodak Co to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Eastman Kodak Co (1985–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eastman Kodak Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see KODK market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.01x | $-7.00 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -119.6% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $38.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +128.1% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-116.00 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -183.1% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-47.00 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2020 | -0.04x | $-35.00 Million | $980.00 Million | ▼ -437.5% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $12.00 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▲ +122.9% |
| 2018 | -0.05x | $-62.00 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2017 | -0.05x | $-67.00 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -487.2% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-13.00 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-95.00 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-128.00 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-667.00 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▼ -694.4% |
| 2012 | -0.03x | $-262.00 Million | $7.96 Billion | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2011 | -0.14x | $-998.00 Million | $7.03 Billion | ▼ -376.1% |
| 2010 | -0.03x | $-219.00 Million | $7.34 Billion | ▼ -69.4% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | $-136.00 Million | $7.72 Billion | ▼ -194.6% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $153.00 Million | $8.22 Billion | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $314.00 Million | $10.63 Billion | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $956.00 Million | $12.91 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $1.21 Billion | $12.95 Billion | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $1.17 Billion | $10.93 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $1.65 Billion | $11.55 Billion | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $2.20 Billion | $10.59 Billion | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $2.06 Billion | $10.47 Billion | ▲ +116.6% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $982.00 Million | $10.78 Billion | ▼ -50.7% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $1.93 Billion | $10.46 Billion | ▲ +33.9% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $1.48 Billion | $10.74 Billion | ▼ -33.8% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $2.08 Billion | $9.98 Billion | ▼ -18.6% |
| 1996 | 0.26x | $2.48 Billion | $9.70 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 1995 | 0.28x | $2.63 Billion | $9.36 Billion | ▲ +87.5% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $1.64 Billion | $10.95 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 1993 | 0.15x | $2.61 Billion | $16.97 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $3.37 Billion | $16.58 Billion | ▲ +43.4% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $2.56 Billion | $18.07 Billion | ▼ -2.0% |
| 1990 | 0.14x | $2.51 Billion | $17.39 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 1989 | 0.15x | $2.62 Billion | $17.01 Billion | ▲ +78.4% |
| 1988 | 0.09x | $1.40 Billion | $16.18 Billion | ▲ +50.3% |
| 1986 | 0.06x | $374.00 Million | $6.51 Billion | ▼ -3.5% |
| 1985 | 0.06x | $332.00 Million | $5.58 Billion | — |