Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-25.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($830.00 Million) in one year. See financial agility of Eastman Kodak Co to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Eastman Kodak Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Eastman Kodak Co across 40 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Eastman Kodak Co (1985–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eastman Kodak Co. Check cash flow quality index of Eastman Kodak Co to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.51x | $480.00 Million | $944.00 Million | ▲ +8395.4% |
| 2024 | -0.01x | $-7.00 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -119.6% |
| 2023 | 0.03x | $38.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +128.1% |
| 2022 | -0.11x | $-116.00 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -183.1% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-47.00 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2020 | -0.04x | $-35.00 Million | $980.00 Million | ▼ -437.5% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $12.00 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▲ +122.9% |
| 2018 | -0.05x | $-62.00 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -2.5% |
| 2017 | -0.05x | $-67.00 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -487.2% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-13.00 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-95.00 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-128.00 Million | $2.26 Billion | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2013 | -0.26x | $-667.00 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▼ -694.4% |
| 2012 | -0.03x | $-262.00 Million | $7.96 Billion | ▲ +76.8% |
| 2011 | -0.14x | $-998.00 Million | $7.03 Billion | ▼ -376.1% |
| 2010 | -0.03x | $-219.00 Million | $7.34 Billion | ▼ -69.4% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | $-136.00 Million | $7.72 Billion | ▼ -194.6% |
| 2008 | 0.02x | $153.00 Million | $8.22 Billion | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $314.00 Million | $10.63 Billion | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $956.00 Million | $12.91 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $1.21 Billion | $12.95 Billion | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $1.17 Billion | $10.93 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2003 | 0.14x | $1.65 Billion | $11.55 Billion | ▼ -31.6% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $2.20 Billion | $10.59 Billion | ▲ +5.5% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $2.06 Billion | $10.47 Billion | ▲ +116.6% |
| 2000 | 0.09x | $982.00 Million | $10.78 Billion | ▼ -50.7% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $1.93 Billion | $10.46 Billion | ▲ +33.9% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $1.48 Billion | $10.74 Billion | ▼ -33.8% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $2.08 Billion | $9.98 Billion | ▼ -18.6% |
| 1996 | 0.26x | $2.48 Billion | $9.70 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 1995 | 0.28x | $2.63 Billion | $9.36 Billion | ▲ +87.5% |
| 1994 | 0.15x | $1.64 Billion | $10.95 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 1993 | 0.15x | $2.61 Billion | $16.97 Billion | ▼ -24.1% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $3.37 Billion | $16.58 Billion | ▲ +43.4% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $2.56 Billion | $18.07 Billion | ▼ -2.0% |
| 1990 | 0.14x | $2.51 Billion | $17.39 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 1989 | 0.15x | $2.62 Billion | $17.01 Billion | ▲ +78.4% |
| 1988 | 0.09x | $1.40 Billion | $16.18 Billion | ▲ +50.3% |
| 1986 | 0.06x | $374.00 Million | $6.51 Billion | ▼ -3.5% |
| 1985 | 0.06x | $332.00 Million | $5.58 Billion | — |