Eastman Kodak Co Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Eastman Kodak Co tangible net worth ratio. Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 97.6% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($17.00 Million) from net assets ($697.00 Million) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Check Eastman Kodak Co strategic asset allocation index to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Eastman Kodak Co (1985–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Eastman Kodak Co from 1985 to 2025. This chart shows how Eastman Kodak Co's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 37 annual periods from 1985 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 97.6%, reflecting net assets of $697.00 Million with intangible assets of $17.00 Million USD. See Eastman Kodak Co (KODK) liquidity to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Eastman Kodak Co Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1985–2025)
Eastman Kodak Co tangible net worth ratio by year from 1985 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Eastman Kodak Co from 1985 to 2025, covering 37 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see KODK company net worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 97.6% | $713.00 Million | $17.00 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2024 | 97.7% | $859.00 Million | $20.00 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2023 | 97.9% | $1.14 Billion | $24.00 Million | $2.35 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2022 | 97.7% | $1.24 Billion | $28.00 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2021 | 96.5% | $977.00 Million | $34.00 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▲ +11.1 pp |
| 2020 | 85.4% | $268.00 Million | $39.00 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +2.2 pp |
| 2019 | 83.3% | $281.00 Million | $47.00 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +18.6 pp |
| 2018 | 64.7% | $170.00 Million | $60.00 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2017 | 61.1% | $221.00 Million | $86.00 Million | $1.71 Billion | ▲ +62.3 pp |
| 2016 | -1.2% | $83.00 Million | $84.00 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +52.2 pp |
| 2015 | -53.4% | $103.00 Million | $158.00 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▼ -92.5 pp |
| 2014 | 39.1% | $299.00 Million | $182.00 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▼ -27.1 pp |
| 2013 | 66.2% | $648.00 Million | $219.00 Million | $3.20 Billion | ▼ -8.1 pp |
| 2008 | 74.3% | $961.00 Million | $247.00 Million | $9.18 Billion | ▼ -13.8 pp |
| 2007 | 88.0% | $3.03 Billion | $362.00 Million | $13.66 Billion | ▲ +35.8 pp |
| 2006 | 52.2% | $1.41 Billion | $673.00 Million | $14.32 Billion | ▲ +61.1 pp |
| 2005 | -8.8% | $1.97 Billion | $2.14 Billion | $14.92 Billion | ▼ -70.9 pp |
| 2004 | 62.1% | $3.81 Billion | $1.45 Billion | $14.74 Billion | ▲ +4.5 pp |
| 2003 | 57.6% | $3.26 Billion | $1.38 Billion | $14.82 Billion | ▼ -7.1 pp |
| 2002 | 64.7% | $2.78 Billion | $981.00 Million | $13.37 Billion | ▼ -2.6 pp |
| 2001 | 67.2% | $2.89 Billion | $948.00 Million | $13.36 Billion | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 2000 | 72.4% | $3.43 Billion | $947.00 Million | $14.21 Billion | ▼ -2.5 pp |
| 1999 | 74.9% | $3.91 Billion | $982.00 Million | $14.37 Billion | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 1998 | 69.1% | $3.99 Billion | $1.23 Billion | $14.73 Billion | ▼ -13.6 pp |
| 1997 | 82.7% | $3.16 Billion | $548.00 Million | $13.14 Billion | ▼ -5.1 pp |
| 1996 | 87.7% | $4.73 Billion | $581.00 Million | $14.44 Billion | ▼ -1.8 pp |
| 1995 | 89.5% | $5.12 Billion | $536.00 Million | $14.48 Billion | ▲ +4.9 pp |
| 1994 | 84.7% | $4.02 Billion | $616.00 Million | $14.97 Billion | ▲ +109.4 pp |
| 1993 | -24.7% | $3.36 Billion | $4.19 Billion | $20.32 Billion | ▼ -59.6 pp |
| 1992 | 34.8% | $6.56 Billion | $4.27 Billion | $23.14 Billion | ▲ +6.1 pp |
| 1991 | 28.8% | $6.10 Billion | $4.35 Billion | $24.17 Billion | ▼ -5.2 pp |
| 1990 | 34.0% | $6.74 Billion | $4.45 Billion | $24.12 Billion | ▲ +2.9 pp |
| 1989 | 31.1% | $6.64 Billion | $4.58 Billion | $23.65 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 1988 | 32.0% | $6.78 Billion | $4.61 Billion | $22.96 Billion | ▼ -68.0 pp |
| 1987 | 100.0% | $6.01 Billion | $0.00 | $14.45 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1986 | 100.0% | $6.39 Billion | $0.00 | $12.90 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1985 | 100.0% | $6.56 Billion | $0.00 | $12.14 Billion | — |