Telefonica Brasil SA ADR (VIV) — Cash Flow Quality Index
Telefonica Brasil SA ADR (VIV) has a Cash Flow Quality Index of 2.44x as of September 2025. Operating cash flow of $4.61 Billion exceeds net income of $1.89 Billion, indicating high earnings quality where cash backs reported profits. Explore VIV long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
Cash Flow Quality Index
Operating Cash Flow
Net Income
Data as of
Telefonica Brasil SA ADR Cash Flow Quality Index (1998–2024)
Historical Cash Flow Quality Index for Telefonica Brasil SA ADR across 27 annual periods. Values consistently above 1.0x indicate high-quality earnings. Check tangible equity quality of Telefonica Brasil SA ADR to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
Annual Cash Flow Quality Index for Telefonica Brasil SA ADR (1998–2024)
Year-by-year earnings quality comparison for Telefonica Brasil SA ADR. For live market cap and the full company financial profile, see how much is Telefonica Brasil SA ADR worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Operating CF (USD) | Net Income | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2.94x | $19.88 Billion | $6.76 Billion | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2023 | 3.37x | $18.79 Billion | $5.57 Billion | ▼ -14.0% |
| 2022 | 3.92x | $18.94 Billion | $4.83 Billion | ▲ +29.3% |
| 2021 | 3.03x | $18.07 Billion | $5.96 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2020 | 3.22x | $19.34 Billion | $6.01 Billion | ▲ +16.2% |
| 2019 | 2.77x | $17.72 Billion | $6.39 Billion | ▲ +161.7% |
| 2018 | 1.06x | $11.94 Billion | $11.28 Billion | ▼ -52.0% |
| 2017 | 2.21x | $12.64 Billion | $5.73 Billion | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2016 | 2.23x | $11.44 Billion | $5.13 Billion | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2015 | 2.38x | $10.47 Billion | $4.39 Billion | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2014 | 1.97x | $9.38 Billion | $4.75 Billion | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2013 | 2.05x | $9.58 Billion | $4.66 Billion | ▲ +46.1% |
| 2012 | 1.41x | $9.73 Billion | $6.92 Billion | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2011 | 1.44x | $8.14 Billion | $5.66 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2010 | 1.32x | $4.53 Billion | $3.43 Billion | ▼ -34.9% |
| 2009 | 2.03x | $4.41 Billion | $2.17 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2008 | 2.12x | $5.13 Billion | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2007 | 2.00x | $4.73 Billion | $2.36 Billion | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2006 | 1.78x | $5.00 Billion | $2.81 Billion | ▼ -18.4% |
| 2005 | 2.18x | $5.54 Billion | $2.54 Billion | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2004 | 2.57x | $5.61 Billion | $2.18 Billion | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2003 | 3.13x | $4.96 Billion | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -68.7% |
| 2002 | 10.02x | $4.57 Billion | $456.52 Million | ▲ +147.4% |
| 2001 | 4.05x | $3.77 Billion | $930.83 Million | ▲ +42.3% |
| 2000 | 2.85x | $2.64 Billion | $928.46 Million | ▼ -48.3% |
| 1999 | 5.50x | $2.69 Billion | $488.46 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 1998 | 3.89x | $2.14 Billion | $550.21 Million | — |