Cheil Grinding (001560) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.10x

Cheil Grinding (001560) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.10x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩1.25 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩12.41 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Cheil Grinding to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.10x

Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩1.25 Billion

KRW

Total Liabilities

₩12.41 Billion

KRW

Data as of

Dec 2025

Most recent filing

Cheil Grinding Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2009–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Cheil Grinding across 17 annual periods. Also explore 001560 year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cheil Grinding (2009–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cheil Grinding. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Cheil Grinding stock valuation.

Year	CF-to-Debt Ratio	Operating CF (KRW)	Total Liabilities	YoY Change
2025	0.65x	₩8.08 Billion	₩12.41 Billion	▲ +61.5%
2024	0.40x	₩6.80 Billion	₩16.86 Billion	▼ -64.3%
2023	1.13x	₩12.20 Billion	₩10.79 Billion	▲ +200.9%
2022	0.38x	₩4.49 Billion	₩11.95 Billion	▲ +39.3%
2021	0.27x	₩3.66 Billion	₩13.58 Billion	▼ -66.8%
2020	0.81x	₩10.38 Billion	₩12.77 Billion	▲ +118.8%
2019	0.37x	₩6.87 Billion	₩18.49 Billion	▲ +40.1%
2018	0.27x	₩5.71 Billion	₩21.53 Billion	▲ +12.0%
2017	0.24x	₩6.19 Billion	₩26.15 Billion	▼ -45.1%
2016	0.43x	₩12.06 Billion	₩27.96 Billion	▲ +50.5%
2015	0.29x	₩8.76 Billion	₩30.58 Billion	▼ -8.4%
2014	0.31x	₩9.72 Billion	₩31.11 Billion	▲ +19.9%
2013	0.26x	₩7.26 Billion	₩27.87 Billion	▼ -56.7%
2012	0.60x	₩13.28 Billion	₩22.07 Billion	▲ +179.5%
2011	0.22x	₩4.85 Billion	₩22.54 Billion	▼ -31.8%
2010	0.32x	₩5.75 Billion	₩18.19 Billion	▼ -13.6%
2009	0.37x	₩7.74 Billion	₩21.15 Billion	—

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.