Nexen Tire (002350) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.02x

Nexen Tire (002350) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩67.65 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩2.95 Trillion) in one year. See how much free cash does Nexen Tire generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

₩67.65 Billion
KRW

Total Liabilities

₩2.95 Trillion
KRW

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Nexen Tire Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2007–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Nexen Tire across 17 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Nexen Tire to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Nexen Tire (2007–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nexen Tire. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Nexen Tire market cap and net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (KRW) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.10x ₩259.33 Billion ₩2.70 Trillion ▲ +0.3%
2023 0.10x ₩241.86 Billion ₩2.53 Trillion ▲ +326.0%
2022 -0.04x ₩-99.41 Billion ₩2.35 Trillion ▼ -135.5%
2021 0.12x ₩265.16 Billion ₩2.22 Trillion ▲ +32.8%
2020 0.09x ₩179.09 Billion ₩1.99 Trillion ▼ -42.1%
2019 0.16x ₩291.46 Billion ₩1.88 Trillion ▲ +79.3%
2018 0.09x ₩156.98 Billion ₩1.81 Trillion ▼ -50.6%
2017 0.18x ₩255.10 Billion ₩1.46 Trillion ▼ -35.3%
2016 0.27x ₩383.19 Billion ₩1.42 Trillion ▲ +30.6%
2015 0.21x ₩320.82 Billion ₩1.55 Trillion ▲ +8.9%
2014 0.19x ₩303.51 Billion ₩1.59 Trillion ▲ +36.9%
2013 0.14x ₩209.01 Billion ₩1.50 Trillion ▲ +28.6%
2012 0.11x ₩146.80 Billion ₩1.36 Trillion ▼ -40.0%
2010 0.18x ₩133.29 Billion ₩739.62 Billion ▼ -46.6%
2009 0.34x ₩213.54 Billion ₩633.23 Billion ▲ +316.4%
2008 0.08x ₩58.36 Billion ₩720.68 Billion ▼ -51.4%
2007 0.17x ₩72.24 Billion ₩433.76 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.