Keyang Elec Ma Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Keyang Elec Ma cash flow-to-debt ratio. Keyang Elec Ma (012200) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of ₩-9.23 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (₩191.85 Billion) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Keyang Elec Ma to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Keyang Elec Ma (2001–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Keyang Elec Ma from 2001 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Keyang Elec Ma across 24 annual periods. Check Keyang Elec Ma cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Keyang Elec Ma Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
Keyang Elec Ma cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Keyang Elec Ma. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Keyang Elec Ma.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (KRW) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.19x | ₩-26.47 Billion | ₩137.24 Billion | ▼ -312.1% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | ₩10.15 Billion | ₩111.67 Billion | ▲ +345.3% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | ₩-6.29 Billion | ₩169.63 Billion | ▲ +8.7% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | ₩-4.13 Billion | ₩101.83 Billion | ▼ -122.0% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | ₩18.44 Billion | ₩99.70 Billion | ▲ +763.1% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | ₩-2.66 Billion | ₩95.44 Billion | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2018 | -0.03x | ₩-2.97 Billion | ₩85.16 Billion | ▼ -112.6% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | ₩19.78 Billion | ₩71.58 Billion | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2016 | 0.29x | ₩18.73 Billion | ₩64.85 Billion | ▼ -23.1% |
| 2015 | 0.38x | ₩19.21 Billion | ₩51.14 Billion | ▲ +117.5% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | ₩8.86 Billion | ₩51.32 Billion | ▼ -54.3% |
| 2013 | 0.38x | ₩11.95 Billion | ₩31.63 Billion | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2012 | 0.46x | ₩13.91 Billion | ₩30.22 Billion | ▲ +438.1% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | ₩2.74 Billion | ₩32.01 Billion | ▼ -72.1% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | ₩7.41 Billion | ₩24.18 Billion | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2009 | 0.28x | ₩5.92 Billion | ₩20.95 Billion | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | ₩3.35 Billion | ₩18.64 Billion | ▼ -74.1% |
| 2007 | 0.69x | ₩14.92 Billion | ₩21.50 Billion | ▲ +212.8% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | ₩4.10 Billion | ₩18.47 Billion | ▲ +129.7% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | ₩1.60 Billion | ₩16.55 Billion | ▼ -59.1% |
| 2004 | 0.24x | ₩4.08 Billion | ₩17.25 Billion | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2003 | 0.25x | ₩4.48 Billion | ₩17.60 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | ₩6.59 Billion | ₩22.98 Billion | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2001 | 1.16x | ₩23.83 Billion | ₩20.49 Billion | — |