Paramount Global Class A (PARAA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Paramount Global Class A (PARAA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $159.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($27.82 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Paramount Global Class A to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Paramount Global Class A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Paramount Global Class A across 32 annual periods. Also explore PARAA year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Paramount Global Class A (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Paramount Global Class A. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Paramount Global Class A (PARAA) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.03x | $752.00 Million | $29.39 Billion | ▲ +64.3% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $475.00 Million | $30.49 Billion | ▲ +147.4% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | $219.00 Million | $34.79 Billion | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $953.00 Million | $35.65 Billion | ▼ -57.3% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $2.29 Billion | $36.61 Billion | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $1.23 Billion | $36.23 Billion | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $1.43 Billion | $33.99 Billion | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | $887.00 Million | $18.86 Billion | ▼ -42.7% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $1.69 Billion | $20.55 Billion | ▲ +7.1% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $1.39 Billion | $18.20 Billion | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $1.27 Billion | $17.10 Billion | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $1.87 Billion | $16.42 Billion | ▲ +2.1% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $1.81 Billion | $16.25 Billion | ▲ +4.0% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $1.75 Billion | $16.29 Billion | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $1.74 Billion | $16.32 Billion | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $939.40 Million | $17.94 Billion | ▼ -55.4% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $2.15 Billion | $18.29 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $2.19 Billion | $18.96 Billion | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $1.89 Billion | $19.99 Billion | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | $3.54 Billion | $21.29 Billion | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $3.64 Billion | $25.97 Billion | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $3.50 Billion | $26.02 Billion | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $3.12 Billion | $26.42 Billion | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $3.51 Billion | $26.88 Billion | ▲ +55.3% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $2.32 Billion | $27.64 Billion | ▲ +246.1% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $294.10 Million | $12.11 Billion | ▼ -67.5% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | $864.10 Million | $11.56 Billion | ▲ +227.6% |
| 1997 | 0.02x | $340.00 Million | $14.91 Billion | ▲ +425.4% |
| 1996 | 0.00x | $70.50 Million | $16.24 Billion | ▲ +32.2% |
| 1995 | 0.00x | $55.60 Million | $16.93 Billion | ▼ -84.0% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $339.20 Million | $16.48 Billion | ▼ -48.7% |
| 1989 | 0.04x | $132.20 Million | $3.30 Billion | — |