Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR (SIM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR (SIM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.16 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.40 Billion) in one year. Explore SIM long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR across 30 annual periods. Also explore Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR (SIM) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.35x | $5.54 Billion | $15.61 Billion | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | $5.18 Billion | $17.93 Billion | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2022 | 0.45x | $8.79 Billion | $19.64 Billion | ▼ -95.9% |
| 2021 | 10.95x | $8.39 Billion | $765.96 Million | ▲ +88.7% |
| 2020 | 5.80x | $3.63 Billion | $626.30 Million | ▲ +300.0% |
| 2019 | 1.45x | $1.04 Billion | $718.86 Million | ▲ +493.7% |
| 2018 | 0.24x | $3.18 Billion | $13.02 Billion | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $2.67 Billion | $12.08 Billion | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | $3.43 Billion | $8.43 Billion | ▲ +4543.4% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $62.94 Million | $7.19 Billion | ▼ -94.8% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $1.37 Billion | $8.12 Billion | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $2.05 Billion | $7.00 Billion | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2012 | 0.51x | $3.50 Billion | $6.87 Billion | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2011 | 0.42x | $2.95 Billion | $7.00 Billion | ▲ +3901.5% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $1.16 Billion | $109.96 Billion | ▼ -94.5% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $1.82 Billion | $9.51 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $1.82 Billion | $9.51 Billion | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $2.35 Billion | $5.58 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2006 | 0.47x | $2.30 Billion | $4.90 Billion | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2005 | 0.37x | $877.20 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▲ +28.9% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $396.86 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | $396.86 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $316.86 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▲ +206.4% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $236.40 Million | $3.72 Billion | ▼ -71.5% |
| 1999 | 0.22x | $723.53 Million | $3.25 Billion | ▲ +737.1% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | $88.03 Million | $3.31 Billion | ▼ -67.7% |
| 1997 | 0.08x | $243.47 Million | $2.96 Billion | ▼ -63.8% |
| 1996 | 0.23x | $612.48 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +1556.3% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-38.52 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▲ +92.7% |
| 1994 | -0.21x | $-482.14 Million | $2.26 Billion | — |