Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR (SIM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR (SIM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.16 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.40 Billion) in one year. See Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR (SIM) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR across 30 annual periods. Also explore Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SIM market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.35x | $5.54 Billion | $15.61 Billion | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | $5.18 Billion | $17.93 Billion | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2022 | 0.45x | $8.79 Billion | $19.64 Billion | ▼ -95.9% |
| 2021 | 10.95x | $8.39 Billion | $765.96 Million | ▲ +88.7% |
| 2020 | 5.80x | $3.63 Billion | $626.30 Million | ▲ +300.0% |
| 2019 | 1.45x | $1.04 Billion | $718.86 Million | ▲ +493.7% |
| 2018 | 0.24x | $3.18 Billion | $13.02 Billion | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $2.67 Billion | $12.08 Billion | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | $3.43 Billion | $8.43 Billion | ▲ +4543.4% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $62.94 Million | $7.19 Billion | ▼ -94.8% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $1.37 Billion | $8.12 Billion | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $2.05 Billion | $7.00 Billion | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2012 | 0.51x | $3.50 Billion | $6.87 Billion | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2011 | 0.42x | $2.95 Billion | $7.00 Billion | ▲ +3901.5% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $1.16 Billion | $109.96 Billion | ▼ -94.5% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $1.82 Billion | $9.51 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $1.82 Billion | $9.51 Billion | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $2.35 Billion | $5.58 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2006 | 0.47x | $2.30 Billion | $4.90 Billion | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2005 | 0.37x | $877.20 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▲ +28.9% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $396.86 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | $396.86 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $316.86 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▲ +206.4% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $236.40 Million | $3.72 Billion | ▼ -71.5% |
| 1999 | 0.22x | $723.53 Million | $3.25 Billion | ▲ +737.1% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | $88.03 Million | $3.31 Billion | ▼ -67.7% |
| 1997 | 0.08x | $243.47 Million | $2.96 Billion | ▼ -63.8% |
| 1996 | 0.23x | $612.48 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +1556.3% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-38.52 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▲ +92.7% |
| 1994 | -0.21x | $-482.14 Million | $2.26 Billion | — |