Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR cash flow-to-debt ratio. Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR (SIM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.10x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.16 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.40 Billion) in one year. Check SIM total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR (1994–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR from 1994 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR across 30 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2024)
Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Grupo Simec SAB de CV ADR. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SIM cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.35x | $5.54 Billion | $15.61 Billion | ▲ +22.8% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | $5.18 Billion | $17.93 Billion | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2022 | 0.45x | $8.79 Billion | $19.64 Billion | ▼ -95.9% |
| 2021 | 10.95x | $8.39 Billion | $765.96 Million | ▲ +88.7% |
| 2020 | 5.80x | $3.63 Billion | $626.30 Million | ▲ +300.0% |
| 2019 | 1.45x | $1.04 Billion | $718.86 Million | ▲ +493.7% |
| 2018 | 0.24x | $3.18 Billion | $13.02 Billion | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2017 | 0.22x | $2.67 Billion | $12.08 Billion | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2016 | 0.41x | $3.43 Billion | $8.43 Billion | ▲ +4543.4% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $62.94 Million | $7.19 Billion | ▼ -94.8% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $1.37 Billion | $8.12 Billion | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2013 | 0.29x | $2.05 Billion | $7.00 Billion | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2012 | 0.51x | $3.50 Billion | $6.87 Billion | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2011 | 0.42x | $2.95 Billion | $7.00 Billion | ▲ +3901.5% |
| 2010 | 0.01x | $1.16 Billion | $109.96 Billion | ▼ -94.5% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $1.82 Billion | $9.51 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $1.82 Billion | $9.51 Billion | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $2.35 Billion | $5.58 Billion | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2006 | 0.47x | $2.30 Billion | $4.90 Billion | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2005 | 0.37x | $877.20 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▲ +28.9% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $396.86 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | $396.86 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +48.3% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $316.86 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▲ +206.4% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $236.40 Million | $3.72 Billion | ▼ -71.5% |
| 1999 | 0.22x | $723.53 Million | $3.25 Billion | ▲ +737.1% |
| 1998 | 0.03x | $88.03 Million | $3.31 Billion | ▼ -67.7% |
| 1997 | 0.08x | $243.47 Million | $2.96 Billion | ▼ -63.8% |
| 1996 | 0.23x | $612.48 Million | $2.69 Billion | ▲ +1556.3% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-38.52 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▲ +92.7% |
| 1994 | -0.21x | $-482.14 Million | $2.26 Billion | — |